View Single Post
 
Old 09-19-2018, 08:26 AM
rwt1405's Avatar
rwt1405 rwt1405 is offline
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 14,958
Liked 2,549 Times in 1,145 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RGVshooter View Post
I only shot around 400-600 rounds or so since owning it...The aluminum alloy frame is taking a beating from opening/closing the cylinder and I have no idea what Smith is going to do about that pitting or crack by the firing pin bushing... If they offer me a replacement gun I would choose something else. The 642 is a great carry gun but not built to last at the shootin' range IMO.
I agree they are NOT range guns, that is why (at least for me) I don’t use them as “range guns”.

I have 2 642’s, first purchased about 20 or so years ago (I believe about 1996-1998) and they are still going.

Of course I also have a couple of 640’s that I use to take some “wear and tear” off the 642’s, yet function basically the same, just a bit heavier.

So yes, I agree with you, in that if you want the 642 to be your “range gun”, that you will likely be better served by another handgun.

Good luck with whatever you decide to do.

Last edited by rwt1405; 09-19-2018 at 08:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: