View Single Post
 
Old 06-12-2019, 08:48 AM
lrrifleman's Avatar
lrrifleman lrrifleman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 19,021
Liked 4,190 Times in 1,865 Posts
Default

I am not a LEO, but I feel the need to chime in. I do believe that the increased firepower of the semi-auto has it's place in law enforcement, provided that the rounds hit the designated target. I think that, as a civilian, I could have more confidence in a properly presented LEO carrying a revolver than most of the young officers carrying some flavor of semi-auto.

Personally,I believe that the worst "advancement" to hit police training is the Q target with the 70% qualification standard. I believe that most officers are better served by training with the decimal silhouette or the old "Kill/Disable" silhouette .

A case in point is a local trooper armed with possibly a Glock engaged in a firefight with an armed suspect. He fired 3 shots and never connected, and then a foot chase resulted. Suspect was caught, but was the officer effective in the firefight? Had it not been a rural setting, there is a high probability that there would have been collateral injuries.

The extra firepower is beneficial only when it connects with the adversary in the firefight!
__________________
Judge control not gun control!
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post: