View Single Post
 
Old 03-30-2020, 11:37 AM
transit transit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mos Eisley
Posts: 468
Likes: 2,276
Liked 982 Times in 308 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TMan51 View Post
I wonder about that. I have a M60 Talo .38 Special, and a M60 .357. The cylinders are identical. I have often wondered if S&W simply grabbed a bunch of cylinders from the M60 bucket and chambered them for the .38? In which case it would take a lot of stupidity to over dose the gun with any .38 ammo.

Old thread. I guess we're all spending more time surfing these days!

I've opined on this here before, and that's definitely all it is, I have no inside knowledge.

At the time S&W first fielded these guns, the "latest and greatest" ammunition for the .38 Special was the Federal 38HS2G. That was the 147 grain Hydra-Shok. It was the FBI's last .38 load and had been designed to meet their then new and developing penetration/expansion models.

It was rated by Federal as +P+.

The loading was not especially hot, but that's how they listed it. Maybe because that was still the era of, "For Law Enforcement Use Only" and the +P+ went along with that. Who knows?

My belief is that the, "Rated for +P+" on those early M640s was directly related to the 147g Hydra-Shok.

S&W could not field a brand new, law enforcement oriented revolver, that couldn't handle the then-current FBI load.

Soon thereafter, the FBI (and everyone else in law enforcement) moved on, and Smith dropped the +P+ markings to avoid sanctioning something that had no true definition anyway.

Last edited by transit; 03-30-2020 at 11:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post: