View Single Post
 
Old 06-11-2020, 11:50 AM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,853
Likes: 252
Liked 29,496 Times in 14,228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tenntex32 View Post
I too am curious about the possible S&W rework markings. I have always heard that S&W would not do rework on Victory models, but I kinda took that as an absolute with regards to Victory models in civilian ownership.

Surely S&W wouldn't turn down refurbishment rework on a large enough batch from the Government/Navy...…...especially if Navy fliers still used them extensively post-WWII. (I still think that there would have been gobs of them still floating around in Navy supply/armory inventories so that actually having to have S&W repair/refurbish any of them would be a bit unusual and/or unnecessary.)

It does bring up a very interesting topic with regards to possible factory rework/refurbishment government contract(s) pertaining to the Victory model. You would think if it was truly a large need it would have been performed at an arsenal or armory level similar to what happened with the M1917 revolvers...…..but I've never really heard of either factory refurbishment or arsenal refurbishment for Victory models for the govt/military.

Definitely much food for thought and actual data supporting either would be greatly appreciated!

Dale
My assumption was that if refurbishment of Victories had been required, at least in any quantity, they would have been sent to one of the military arsenals where that sort of work was done routinely rather than back to S&W.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: