That would indeed be very bad. However, I think that the current makeup of the Supreme Court would be more inclined to make strict scrutiny the standard. It is the standard all other rights in the Bill of Rights are held too. There is no reason to make an exception for one right to say that it is less valuable.
Also when you use the term high-capacity magazines you are giving in to the other side's definition. These are standard capacity magazines which were designed to be used with the gun by the guns design. It's appropriate to call 10-round or other than standard capacity magazines crippled magazines because they are intended to make the guns less usable for self-defense and other lawful purposes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bushmaster1313
Thanks
Yes a typo. I meant to say Supreme Court could make intermediate scrutiny the law. A very bad result
|