OP back again
New York State ("New York") [Brief at 17] makes the curious argument that in the late 1800's New York and other jurisdictions revived the idea of requiring special permission from the King to bear arms:
Quote:
b. During the late nineteenth century, New York
and other jurisdictions began regulating public carry
through licensure, reviving the model of allowing
individuals to go armed only with “the king’s special
licence.”
|
But then New York goes on to imply that requiring the King's Special License was not strict enough. See Brief at p. 18.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't we fight a revolution against requiring permission from the King to exercise Rights endowed by The Creator?