View Single Post
 
Old 01-14-2022, 01:26 PM
Alk8944 Alk8944 is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sandy Utah
Posts: 8,747
Likes: 1,590
Liked 8,916 Times in 3,555 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by STORMINORMAN View Post
If all those J-frames with alloy frames are commonly certified(?) for +P use, why wouldn't a K-frame be as well...? I realize the ammo is "rated" as +P, but the 860fps claimed and the 16,600psi from the test referred to above isn't all that likely to destroy a numbered-Model S&W revolver. Is it?

On the other hand, does the OP's Model 12 have the alloy cylinder as well? That might make a difference...

Cheers!

P.S. Personally, I might just consider a Model 15 (Good Luck!) or a 642 or 442 as I now see them available (sans lock, of course!) again.


For some reason this keep being brought up! NO MODEL-MARKED M&P AIRWEIGHT (MODEL 12) HAS EVER HAD AN ALUMINUM CYLINDER. Only some of the earliest pre-model marked guns ever had the aluminum cylinders, and the Air Force M-13 series. If you have any number SCSW try reading it, you will see this is correct!

Last edited by Alk8944; 01-14-2022 at 01:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post: