View Single Post
 
Old 02-15-2024, 12:17 AM
dsf dsf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Escaping CA to OR in 2024
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 1,189
Liked 1,513 Times in 604 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teletech View Post
Colts won't work without moon clips and are vastly harder to work on.
The Smiths will work without moon clips, you just have to pick the cases out.
In any case, buy a mooner-demooner tool. I like the BMT despite the cost.
The 1917 had very slight rifling, so it's common to see them basically a smoothbore by now. So if I were going to look at one to shoot, I'd check bore condition over most other criterion. In my experience because of the shallow rifling they shoot jacketed bullets much better than cast, of course the jacketed bullets also wear the comparatively soft and shallow rifling, so maybe don't expect a 1917 to be a great gun to shoot bullseye with.
I typically find the triggers to be heavy on the military guns, perhaps slightly better on the commercial and Brazilian guns.
I do think if you are going to get one to enjoy, the US-Property marked guns are just a lot more interesting as living history and for me that justifies the higher cost, but if you just want a shooter then save the money.
A 1917 was one of the Indiana Jones guns from the first movie, or rather a commercial one, so there's that angle as well.
True on the earlier Colt 1917s, the chambers were bored all the way through. Later Colts were properly chambered. Mine is 1918 and chambers/extracts ACP with moon clips fine.

A 1917 bored all the way through is a great excuse to start reloading for the 45 AR.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: