View Single Post
 
Old 02-17-2024, 07:48 PM
johngalt's Avatar
johngalt johngalt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MN (East California)
Posts: 5,630
Likes: 1,757
Liked 7,295 Times in 2,781 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pawngal View Post
Didn't Minnesota try something like this a few years ago? Hopefully there are still enough sensible law makers that it never gets out of committee.
I'm an FFL dealer in Iowa, 15 miles from the MN border and I can't sell any of the so-called "assault weapons" to a MN resident. Not sure when that went into affect. MN also requires a permit to buy the "assault weapon" and the FFL has to report the sale to local LE.
MN is chipping away at the 2nd Amendment.
I don't know how sales to a MN resident would work, but an "assault rifle" purchase requires the same purchase permit that is required for a handgun. A MN carry permit satisfies the requirement.

According to federal law, a long gun is still a long gun even if a purchase permit is required. Being an "assault rifle" should not affect the legality, but maybe the purchase permit does? No idea.
__________________
Common sense isn't so common.
Reply With Quote