Which 22lr lever gun - Marlin or Winchester?

In my experience the Marlin 39 and 39A are more accurate than the Winchester 9422.

However the 9422 is smoother operating, with a shorter lever stroke, and better made in similar excellent to mint condition.

The Model 39A is a take down rifle although you need to take care not to lose the bolt.

The 9422 is not marketed as a takedown rifle but comes apart with the removal of a single screw and that screw can be replaced with a no tools required saddle ring screw from Beartooth mercantile.


There’s also a third option in the form of the Browning BL-22. It’s well made and usually less expensive than the other options. It’s also still in production which is a big plus for availability and finding a very nice example. It has the shortest lever stroke of the bunch but gives up some smoothness
to the 9422, and some accuracy to the Marlin. It doesn’t take a tang sight, which is a negative, but Skinner does make an ok performing receiver sight for it (which also requires a taller front sight).

IMG_2675.JPG


The BL-22 is also the smallest of the bunch, other than the trapper variant of the 9422. That’s a pro or a con depending on what you want.

The Model 39/39A and 9422 are nice adult sized rifles, the BL-22 isn’t kid sized (except for their youth model) but it is slightly smaller and lighter than the 9422 and handles like a smaller rifle.


IMG_2671.HEIC



Any of them are one or two orders of magnitude nicer than the Henry and a Rossi .22 LR lever guns.
 
Last edited:
I have no experience with the Marlin .22, but can comment on the Winchester 9422. My 9422 was a Trapper in .22 Magnum. It was very nicely finished, smooth and reliable little rifle.
 

Attachments

  • Winchester 9422, Trapper 22M..jpg
    Winchester 9422, Trapper 22M..jpg
    65.3 KB · Views: 19
I wish I’d purchased both the Winchester 9422 and the Marlin 39A back in the day. I’ve always liked lever action rifles. What I did buy was a Marlin 1897 Texan (a 39A with straight stock and octagon barrel). You get a hold of one of those and you’ll never want to part with it.
 
I've had a 94222 since I was eleven years old. 1976.... I had the loan of an uncle's 39A previously. I really appreciated the more traditional and sleeker lines, smoother action and lighter weight of the 9422. Still have and still love that gun.
OZ
 
I had a few Marlins, a couple of Winchesters, and a Browning. The marlins were micro-groove and lousy shooters. The Winchesters shot OK. The BL22 is a Grade II with the 24 inch octagon bbl and is a fantastic shooter. Sold the M and W guns. Should have kept a W. Kept the BL22. The kids at the club like shooting it and so do I. If Your choice is between M and W exclusively I second W simply because it says Winchester.
 
I like the Marlin, and in that mfgr, I like the Model 97 better than the later Model 39A.
The reasons for that are the stock styling, recv'r styling and the early style magazine tube.

The Stocks are the nice trim early Marlin. Some of the earlier 97's have the slight round top to the recv'r.
The pistol grip stocked 97's are the best looking IMO.

Just a personal choice of course.
But the 1897's are only rated for StdVel ammo, so that has to be taken into account. It can matter to some. It doesn't to me.

I've never been a fan of the Win 9422. Absolutely nothing wrong with them though. Solid guns. Just not my thing.
 
I own/owned all three...a Marlin 39A, a Winchester 9422M, and the Browning BL-22 (Grade II). I've kept the Marlin and the Winchester and gave the Browning to one of my sons. If I had to choose between the Marlin and the Winchester, it would be the Winchester. I'm planning on giving the Marlin to one of my other sons...but I'm still going to hang on to the Winchester until they move me out in a pine box.:D

But, when "push comes to shove," they're all great rifles and it boils down to what you prefer. Bottom line...you're in a win win win situation.:)

fikj8Ws.jpg
 
Last edited:
Once you buy one you going probably going to buy the other, so don’t fret too much. FWIW, I think the 9422 is a little prettier. The old all steel .22’s don’t look or feel cheap. They feel like quality built center fire rifles, but they’re cheap to shoot. Just lovely.
 
for me.. the 9422 is the better looking rifle... the 39A is tye better shooting rifle... I wanted a 9422 as a kid soooooo bad... could never manage to save up enough money...Got the Marlin... still have it.. great rifle.
 
The Marlin 39A had the longest production run of any .22--ever. That should say something about the design and reliability.
 
I once owned an early (1973) 9422 in .22 LR. It was very smooth. Unfortunately, I sold it about 6 years later.

13 years later, I found a Centennial Marlin M39. It has a 20" octagon barrel and a straight stock.

In addition, two of my buddies bought Browning BL-22s and I shot both of them quite a bit.

All of them were good rifles. The Marlin is probably a tad more accurate, but the Winchester was smoother and shot well.

Any of the three would be good choices. If I had my druthers, I would find another a Winchester, but I wouldn't sell the Marlin either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dwh
My 3 which I've owned for a long time. Winchester 9422 bought the year they came out. Came with walnut I switched it to Laminate. Marlin 1894T. 16 in octagon barrel. Browning BL-22 octagon. 22 in bbl. Grade II better wood and nickel engraved receiver. These are made with high quality. I'll never be able to wear them out.
I also have a scoped 1894M that is VERY accurate. That I seldom shoot.

You can't go wrong with any of these lifetime .22's.
 

Attachments

  • 100_1239.jpg
    100_1239.jpg
    164.8 KB · Views: 26
Last edited:
Sadly I haven’t had the opportunity to own a Marlin yet! I do have 3 9422’s a 1993 XTR, 2nd year 9422 and a 1st year 9422m. They’ll go to my nieces and nephew when I’m gone and I not going anywhere soon. In the meantime I’m going to shoot the snot out of them. :D:eek:
 
I’ve got a TDS, Mountie, and 9422, among others. Smoothness goes to the Winchester, convenience to the TDS, and lastly a Mountie then std 39.
 
I received a Marlin 1897 for my 5th birthday in 1955. Couldn’t come close to round count. Did break the main spring in late 60s.
This is a flat spring in the old original 97s. My old man dickered price down to $8 from $10, the high point of his gun trading abilities.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3270.jpg
    IMG_3270.jpg
    76.6 KB · Views: 21
Thanks for all the replies and posts! I'd never have expected all the Winchester love and appreciation nor the huge response from you guys.

After a couple days of looking I found a really fair deal on one. Highly rated shop and even better as it's an XTR. Can't wait for it to show up next week.

I'll be on the lookout for a Mountie next. Wouldn't mind a BL22 either if I can pick up a Grade I field model without the traditional Browning high gloss wood.

Seller's pic - will post later after I can hit the range with it.


https://dedupelist.com/
 
I currently have a first year 9422 and a BL22 in the safe. I really like both of them.

I've owned a few Marlins and liked them plenty, but in the end I found the only .22 Lever gun I wanted for myself was the 9422, and I have kept the BL22 for the kids.

If I had more rack space I would also have a Marlin in there. It's really hard to say which of the three is best because they are all great guns.

In the end, if you have space, just have all 3. They are enjoyable in different enough ways that its well worth having all of them.
 
Thanks for all the replies and posts! I'd never have expected all the Winchester love and appreciation nor the huge response from you guys.

After a couple days of looking I found a really fair deal on one. Highly rated shop and even better as it's an XTR. Can't wait for it to show up next week.

I'll be on the lookout for a Mountie next. Wouldn't mind a BL22 either if I can pick up a Grade I field model without the traditional Browning high gloss wood.

Seller's pic - will post later after I can hit the range with it.


https://dedupelist.com/

Just a caution on 9422 “XTR” rifles. Initially Winchester did not use checkering on its 9422 rifles. In 1978, the first year of the 9422 XTR, the XTRs were also not checkered.

From 1979 onward they checkered the stock and forearm on the 9422 XTR and not the standard 9422s.

After 1989 when Winchester discontinued the XTR series, Winchester checkered the stock and forearm on the standard 9422s. That has created some confusion and some well intentioned people assume if the stock is checkered, it’s an XTR. The fact that all of the 9422 receivers are highly polished helps perpetuate that misperception.

However, there are two things that define a 9422 XTR:

- highly polished flats on the lever and hammer; and

- “XTR” stamped on the barrel.

If it doesn’t have those things, it is not an XTR.

I bring this up, because I have encountered reputable gun shop owners with a post 1989 standard 9422 for sale, that was identified and priced as an “XTR” due to the checkered stock when it clearly was not. They were not trying to be deceptive, they just didn’t know any better.
 
Back
Top