Model29-26.5
Well-known member
I think “sport hunting” is a bit too general, for my taste, anyway. Let’s be more specific. Subsistence hunting is done as a matter of survival - needing food. Maybe a lot of antis confuse what I think of as sport hunting with trophy hunting. I was raised to abhor trophy hunting (killing an animal purely for hide, horns, antlers, etc.). A sport hunter, in my definition, is a combination of trophy hunter and hunter that takes pain to use as much of the animal as he can. I see no ethical problem with collecting the trophy, in that circumstance.
Sport hunting of elephants is not something I care to do. They do form a sort of familial society and are fascinating creatures. (Also can be destructive and very dangerous.) But as has been quite properly pointed to, when they age and are facing death naturally, from frailty, illness, injury, and/or starvation, or when it is necessary to control the population for various reasons, sport hunting makes more sense to me than “control” shooting of them. The cost is enormous, and concern over how and where the money is used is sensible. I could not justify it myself, but I would not demonize those who do. Check into the whole situation before making possibly unfounded conclusions.
Yes. That’s what I’m doing here.