View Single Post
 
Old 07-09-2008, 08:14 AM
bmcgilvray's Avatar
bmcgilvray bmcgilvray is offline
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
Default

I remember when the L-Frame was introduced. It would have been a commercial flop waiting on me to buy it as an improvement over the K-Frame or the N-Frame. I've handled 'em and shot 'em but just don't care for the full-lug barrel. I dislike the front-heavy feel. I might have tried one if they'd made them with a more conventional barrel.

I like the N-Frame .357 revolvers' heft and balance and feel it's the very best home for the .357 Magnum cartridge. There's nothing better for the hand loader, handgun hunter, or competitor who wants to shoot lots of full power loads. If one desires a .357 Magnum of more trim proportions then the K-Frame answers. It is a sensible choice for carrying. I don't think it's as fragile as it's been hyped up to be in more recent times.

The L-Frame .357 Magnum is neither fish nor foul and the J-Frame .357 Magnum is just plain silly in my view.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post: