|
|
02-04-2010, 01:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 956
Likes: 2
Liked 192 Times in 97 Posts
|
|
Fed. .38spc 110g +P+- LEO only
What can anyone tell me about the Federal 110g +P+ 38.Spc. LEO loading....
|
02-04-2010, 02:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 5,932
Liked 5,259 Times in 1,732 Posts
|
|
It is a fairly efficient self defense round. If you want some entertaining reading about comparative terminal ballistics, go to this link and read about a testing lab's efforts in determining the then 'best' round for one shot stops on human sized animals. Goats were used in the "Strasbourg Tests" in the early '90s. The cartridge you mention wasn't available then, but close approximations were. The actual test is linked on the right side of the referenced web page. ......... http://www.thegunzone.com/strasbourg.html
.......... Big Cholla
|
02-04-2010, 03:31 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 739
Liked 3,275 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
That load was available in the early 1980's. A neighbor who worked with Immigration & Naturalization then was issued it as their duty round.
There is no SAAMI industry standard for .38 Special +P+. Much of it is loaded to specifications contracted to with the purchasing agency, such as "a 110 grain j.h.p. bullet loaded to a velocity of X,X00 fps fired from a 2/4/6 inch revolver or vented pressure barrel" (oversimplified, of course), with the manufacturer using whatever propellant they thought best.
Since there is no industry standard, one will encounter batches of the same bullet weights that are loaded to differing velocities.
Said neighbor used to give me a lot of his practice ammo, both the 110 gr. +P+ and 148 gr. wadcutter midrange, which his supervisor gave out monthly for the agents to shoot up on their own for practice. (He was a pretty good shot but didn't like cleaning his gun!) They got more loaded ammo when they brought back the fired brass.
I used to keep him well supplied with fired brass! Nobody had ever given me free ammo 200 rounds at a time!
I believe that the neighbor said that his agency's ammo was purchased on a U.S. Treasury Dept. contract. It was Federal brand (the wadcutter was Winchester-Western) and it was pretty warm stuff. It was a lot hotter than my 110 grain j.h.p. handload of 7.0 grains of Unique, which I now know to be in the +P range. I would only shoot the +P+ stuff in my .357 Mag sixguns.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-04-2010, 05:48 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
If you search this forum, fellow member Armsmaster270 used a Federal 110 gr. +P+ JHP from a 4" gun to stop a knife attack when he was a LEO. It worked well. Of course, his shot placement was stellar.
IIRC, the Corbon 110 gr. +P JHP load behaves and pushes velocities similar to the old treasury load.
Last edited by flop-shank; 02-04-2010 at 05:57 AM.
|
02-04-2010, 07:14 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Bainbridge Island, Wa.
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Liked 117 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Issue weapons of that era were Models 19, 66, in 2.5" and 4" barrel lengths. The treasury load was actually a low-end .357 loading since it was not politically correct to shoot criminals with a .357 Magnum. The gunsmith I worked for saw a few weapons with accelerated wear but no failures. Happy shooting!
|
02-05-2010, 03:20 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I have chroned some of the +P+ loads
out of s&w 66 .357 6 inch barrel ave 10 shots
win +p+ 110 jhp = 1157 fps
fed +p+ 110 jhp = 1210 fps
fed +P+ 147 hydra shok 953 fps
out of s&w 637 38 special 2 inch barrel
win +P+ 110 jhp = 1003 fps
fed +P+ 110 jhp = 994 fps
fed +P+ 147 hydra shok 841 fps
hope this helps some
Jason
|
02-05-2010, 03:33 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 26
Liked 192 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
In the late 70s the Agency I worked for was issued the "Treasury Round", a 110grn +P+ .38spl to carry in our Model 66 four inch and two and a half inch guns.
In several shooting it was found to be bad Juju as it opened up too soon and didn't get good penitration, 10 to 14 inches is what is needed for an round to be effective.
One incident was a big big Sumo kinda dude in Huney LuLu who was shot eight times in the torso and survived because of lack of penitration of the round.
Me, I like at least 125 grain to 158 grain rounds.
The Speer 135grn +P Gold Dot for short barrels is a good round
Just my opinion.
Rule 303
|
02-05-2010, 07:20 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
I can't say about the Federal version as I've not seen any.
Back in the late 19700s I obtained a few boxes of the Winchester produced "Treasury" +P+ load. It clocked 1100 fps from a 4-inch Model 10 according to my notes.
|
02-06-2010, 01:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 620
Likes: 79
Liked 282 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
Per USBP Agent John Jacobs, who was one of three Agents involved in ammo testing in 1984 to replace the issued Winchester 110JHP+P+, reported that the 38Spl 110 +P+ was a very erratic performer in actual shootings. That's why USBP replaced the 110JHP+P+ and issued the .357Mag 110JHP and shortly thereafter the 9mm 115JHP+P+.
|
02-06-2010, 02:12 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 513
Likes: 46
Liked 60 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
I have no data to back me up, but I believe the Treasury Load came out of a combination of loving the "high-velocity/energy theory" of stopping power, along with a desire to have high performance with lower recoil.
It is an interesting round from a historical standpoint. The Illinois State Police was the first state-level police agency to convert to semi-auto pistols back in the late 60s or so, and they issued a similar round in 9mm (115gr JHP +P+), which was also very ineffective.
I've never understood the "high-energy" theory of stopping power. If the round doesn't have enough energy to knock the shooter over, it won't have enough to knock over a bad guy. Yet, that seems to be what people expect... I've got a picture somewhere of a guy on PCP who was shot by 2 Ill. State Troopers approximately 35 times with the above-mentioned 9mm load, and he wasn't stopped until the second 12ga slug severed his spine. That said, none of the 9mms hit the central nervous system, but they were all torso shots... Poor penetration, mediocre shot placement, and meaningless "energy transfer" made that situation very ugly for awhile...
I would bet the Treasury load would be equally problematic. Coolness and the luxury of some time under pressure to provide excellent shot placement, and a 22 will work, so the Treasury Load is NOT worthless, but IMO you could do better out of a 38 with the FBI load (158gr LSWC-HP).
|
02-06-2010, 04:06 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 620
Likes: 79
Liked 282 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMA10mm
I have no data to back me up, but I believe the Treasury Load came out of a combination of loving the "high-velocity/energy theory" of stopping power, along with a desire to have high performance with lower recoil.
It is an interesting round from a historical standpoint. The Illinois State Police was the first state-level police agency to convert to semi-auto pistols back in the late 60s or so, and they issued a similar round in 9mm (115gr JHP +P+), which was also very ineffective.
I've never understood the "high-energy" theory of stopping power. If the round doesn't have enough energy to knock the shooter over, it won't have enough to knock over a bad guy. Yet, that seems to be what people expect... I've got a picture somewhere of a guy on PCP who was shot by 2 Ill. State Troopers approximately 35 times with the above-mentioned 9mm load, and he wasn't stopped until the second 12ga slug severed his spine. That said, none of the 9mms hit the central nervous system, but they were all torso shots... Poor penetration, mediocre shot placement, and meaningless "energy transfer" made that situation very ugly for awhile...
I would bet the Treasury load would be equally problematic. Coolness and the luxury of some time under pressure to provide excellent shot placement, and a 22 will work, so the Treasury Load is NOT worthless, but IMO you could do better out of a 38 with the FBI load (158gr LSWC-HP).
|
You need to re-check your facts.
Both Federal and Winchester designed the 9mm 115JHP+P+ specifically for ISP and both loads were extremely effective in actual shootings. DeKaleb County, GA, still uses the Federal load (9BPLE) with continued success.
USBP's 357Mag 110JHP was also effective in actual shootings, and one of the major reasons that the USBP went to the 9BPLE is because it performed the closest to their issued 357Mag load in actual shootings.
The picture of the shooting you are referring to appeared in the Caliber Press Street Survival book. The issued ISP load in use at the time was NOT the 115JHP+P+, but rather the Winchester 100gr "Power Point" round nosed jacketed softpoint. The 100JSP bullets acted just like FMJ bullets with many of them overpenetrating and exiting. So the 100JSP had plenty of penetration.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-06-2010, 07:47 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Rust Belt Buckle/Mich
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
You need to have a talk with the 125 gr. .357....
......and tell the cat that he ain't supposed to work. It seems that that cartridge has a much better street reputation than any heavy bullet .38 spl. cartridge. Obviously there isn't more metal at play, so what would be the cause of that increase in effectiveness?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMA10mm
I've never understood the "high-energy" theory of stopping power. If the round doesn't have enough energy to knock the shooter over, it won't have enough to knock over a bad guy.
|
It doesn't knock them over. It stuns the nervous system in some people with some shots. No, energy isn't 100% certain because every shot is different, as is every shootee. That's the same reason relying on a large crush cavity isn't 100% either.
Bullets going at high velocities, when properly designed can throw off serious secondary missles that create wound tracks of their own, increasing the likelyhood of hitting something important. They also are easier to make perform reliably through heavy clothing because they are pushed further past their expansion threshold. Good design will take care of penetration issues as well.
|
02-06-2010, 11:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 513
Likes: 46
Liked 60 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CTG_COLLECTOR
You need to re-check your facts.
Both Federal and Winchester designed the 9mm 115JHP+P+ specifically for ISP and both loads were extremely effective in actual shootings. DeKaleb County, GA, still uses the Federal load (9BPLE) with continued success.
USBP's 357Mag 110JHP was also effective in actual shootings, and one of the major reasons that the USBP went to the 9BPLE is because it performed the closest to their issued 357Mag load in actual shootings.
The picture of the shooting you are referring to appeared in the Caliber Press Street Survival book. The issued ISP load in use at the time was NOT the 115JHP+P+, but rather the Winchester 100gr "Power Point" round nosed jacketed softpoint. The 100JSP bullets acted just like FMJ bullets with many of them overpenetrating and exiting. So the 100JSP had plenty of penetration.
|
That's right! Thanks for double-checking and correcting that. I saw the pic during an LE class here in IL about 20 years ago. Now that you mention the 100gr loads, that rang a bell. Still, my impression was right that light bullets and high velocity does not equal effectiveness...
I slightly disagree with you that the 115gr +P+ load was "extremely" effective though. The ISP switched to 40 S&W about 10 years ago after several more failures of the light bullet - high speed concept with the 115gr load.
|
02-25-2010, 01:28 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 7
Liked 469 Times in 278 Posts
|
|
I thought that the first round the ISP issued in their S&W Mod 39, 9mm's was the 100 gr Winchester Power Point???
It was actually a round nosed lead Soft Point.
It worked good in my 39's...
|
02-25-2010, 02:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Nashville TN area
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Liked 17 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Years back some friendly Feds used to keep the local gunshop well supplied. They had the WW 38 +P+ loading. I have ran a bunch of it thru a model 60 and a model 37. They were carring 21/2 inch model 66's at the time. Nice shooting load but warm (ie bit of recoil) for the snubs I had.
|
04-06-2010, 11:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 956
Likes: 2
Liked 192 Times in 97 Posts
|
|
This is a bad *** round...
|
04-10-2010, 12:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,909 Times in 788 Posts
|
|
The Federal 9BPLE round is a well proven round. I don't put much stock in theories...light and fast or heavy and slow.
Now that I think about it, I don't put much stock in handguns at all! Be prepared to rip their eyeballs out in the event that your handgun doesn't get the job done.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
|
10-20-2010, 08:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 956
Likes: 2
Liked 192 Times in 97 Posts
|
|
So was this the FBI round or ATF?
|
10-20-2010, 10:09 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Land of the Free, NC
Posts: 988
Likes: 3
Liked 84 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
I know this is an old thread, but I'll go on record (again) as saying that the early Treasury loads were not so hot, and I don't think the "+P+" designation was even in use at the time. Below is a box that I was issued in the 1970's, when standard sidearms were Colt and S&W .38 Special revolvers. I chronographed this ammo years later, and it averaged only 1077 fps from a 4" Model 15. At the same range session 110 grain Super Vel .38 Special averaged 1221 fps. I think all the talk about hot Treasury loads is just urban legend that gets read and repeated countless times on the internet. That's just my opinion, but it is based on being an actual user of the ammo, and real chrono tests.
Last edited by stiab; 10-20-2010 at 10:18 PM.
|
10-20-2010, 10:18 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,351
Likes: 7,543
Liked 5,590 Times in 2,562 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason223
I have chroned some of the +P+ loads
out of s&w 637 38 special 2 inch barrel
win +P+ 110 jhp = 1003 fps
fed +P+ 110 jhp = 994 fps
fed +P+ 147 hydra shok 841 fps
hope this helps some
Jason
|
This seems to match my limited measurement. With the Federal 110gr +P+ (38FTD), my 2.5" Model 66 gave 1027fps a few feet from the muzzle, with SD of 24, 10-shot sample. My 4" 520 gave 1084fps, SD of 19, 10-shot sample. 110gr .357 ammo from Federal (357D) gave well over 100fps more velocity than the +P+, in each revolver.
|
10-20-2010, 10:43 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
Hi Stiab;
I have a box like that somewhere around here. Your tests pretty well duplicate my 1100 fps/4-inch barrel with that Winchester Treasury load.
|
10-21-2010, 08:47 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: S. California
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
treasury load
The 110gr treasury load aka 110+p+ was never designed to be the hot 4 or 6 inch revolver load. The design spec was 1020 fps when fired from a 2in revolver......think model 36. This velocity is exactly the same as the then cataloged velocity of the 110+p 38 when fired from a 4in ventilated test barrel. All the treasury department wanted was a load that would equal the performance of the 4in when fired from their 2in or 2.5 in revolvers.
Federal and Winchester built loads to that spec and later Remington followed. Federal used a pure lead core in theirs while the others kept some antimony. The jackets went thru several changes with different length skiving all designed for snub barrel performance.
Yes the Super Vel and even the old Norma 38 magnum were hotter loads. The Norma wouldnt expand if you fired it at concrete and SuperVel would not have been able to load the several million rounds needed every year for agencies piggybacking off the contract.
If chronographing the loads from a recently made J frame keep in mind that they have a magnum length cylinder and will bleed velocity compared to a regular 38 cylinder........maybe 20fps or more.
It did what it was designed to do but many agencies used it in longer barrels and as the Border Patrol found with the Federal version it could result in failures.
|
07-22-2013, 09:16 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 956
Likes: 2
Liked 192 Times in 97 Posts
|
|
I know there is a super vel thread here on the forum- but
This was also a very good load...
|
07-22-2013, 11:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Border
Posts: 426
Likes: 86
Liked 262 Times in 129 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMA10mm
...I slightly disagree with you that the 115gr +P+ load was "extremely" effective though. The ISP switched to 40 S&W about 10 years ago after several more failures of the light bullet - high speed concept with the 115gr load.
|
There's a former ISP Captain that posts here now & again and if I recall correctly he said the ISP changed to the .40 S&W because it was the "in" thing to do at the time and the decision was made by Poindexters flying the "brown bomber" in the office. I do not recall him mentioning anything other than stellar field reports re the Fed. BPLE & the Win. 9mm 115 gr. +p+ that replaced it at ISP.
|
07-22-2013, 11:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 620
Likes: 79
Liked 282 Times in 164 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NE450No2
I thought that the first round the ISP issued in their S&W Mod 39, 9mm's was the 100 gr Winchester Power Point???
It was actually a round nosed lead Soft Point.
It worked good in my 39's...
|
ISP used several different 9mm loads including 100FMJ, 115FMJ, W-W 100JSP "Power Point", special Fed 95JSP "dish point" at (IIRC) 1400fps & 1st gen Win 115STHP. Federal was first contracted for developing the 115JHP+P+ and then Win got the contract when Fed refused to up the velocity of their 9BPLE.
|
07-23-2013, 12:12 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 31,012
Likes: 41,677
Liked 29,256 Times in 13,834 Posts
|
|
That what I figured
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule 303
In the late 70s the Agency I worked for was issued the "Treasury Round", a 110grn +P+ .38spl to carry in our Model 66 four inch and two and a half inch guns.
In several shooting it was found to be bad Juju as it opened up too soon and didn't get good penitration, 10 to 14 inches is what is needed for an round to be effective.
One incident was a big big Sumo kinda dude in Huney LuLu who was shot eight times in the torso and survived because of lack of penitration of the round.
Me, I like at least 125 grain to 158 grain rounds.
The Speer 135grn +P Gold Dot for short barrels is a good round
Just my opinion.
Rule 303
|
Back at that time the 'light bullet/high velocity' philosophy was in full swing. Time has said that it's not a good approach. I personally listen to the medium-high velocity with a heavy bullet. For me that's a 140-158 grain bullet at close to 1000 fpm. That's a really souped-up .38 or a light .357 round.
Just my opinion, too.
Oh, as a qualifier for that statement let me say jacketed bullets in the 70s aren't the same as jacketed bullets today.
Last edited by rwsmith; 07-23-2013 at 12:17 AM.
|
07-23-2013, 08:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 956
Likes: 2
Liked 192 Times in 97 Posts
|
|
|
07-28-2013, 06:29 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,832
Likes: 7,857
Liked 25,770 Times in 8,708 Posts
|
|
I have a few boxes (Winchester & Federal) one is 95 grain, the other 110 grain. I suppose back in the day these were issued to Fed's they were "politically correct" NON MAGNUM rounds, but in todays world, they are nothing special. They also tend to beat the heck out of a small frame gun. At best they usually do under 1000 fps out of a 2" bbl.
The Buffalo Bore 158 grain +P Heavy LSWCHP-GC weighs much more, does a consistent 1020 fps out of a 2" Chief's, has a lot less muzzle flash,
much more accurate, will shoot POA/POI out of most Smiths & Colts, and has MUCH BETTER energy and stopping power. IMHO the Treasury +P+ is best kept on your display shelf as a curio or collectible.
There are basically two trains of though for self defense ammo.......
a) light & fast
b) heavy but slower
Personally I've always liked B but the BB load is actually heavier & faster!
|
|
Tags
|
223, 357 magnum, 38spl, 637, cartridge, colt, gunsmith, j frame, model 10, model 15, model 37, model 60, model 66, remington, snubnose, wadcutter, winchester |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|