.44 Magnum Load for Bear that's Safe to Shoot in 629

Thanks for all the great info.

One of the reasons I asked about this, was an ammo review I read on midwayusa.com in reference to:

Buffalo Bore Ammunition 44 Remington Magnum +P+ 340 Grain Lead Flat Nose Gas Check Box of 20
http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/default.aspx?productNumber=513011

This had me a little worried.

Matt G of Fairbanks, AK : Date posted: 8/4/2010

I bought these rounds for bear protection while moose hunting. I shot them in a super redhawk. For my pistol they did fine, at the range it has a 1.5" pattern at 25 yards which was outstanding. However, my buddy now has a .44 magnum S&W paper weight. He shot two rounds of it after I put 10 rounds through mine. The 2nd round he shot off seized the gun up solid and the gunsmith has deemed it a $900 paper weight. His S&W was sent back to the factory to see if they could repair it and had no luck freeing the cylinder and informed him that due to him using a round with pressures in excess of what S&W has rated the fire arm for they cannot help him. I would not recommend this round for anything other than Rugers and Freedom Arms revolvers.
 
Disagree all you want. Interesting that you would jump to a conclusion about where he placed bullets to try to substaniate your incorrect assumption. People that have little experience with bears think a bear is a bear is a bear. I saw posts recently by someone from Michigan that talked about Michigan's Brown Bear population -- maybe that was you? I was only trying to point out that not all bears are the same. All the Blacks I've seen hung and skinned looked more like a human than anything else, although, as I said, I realize there can be really large Blacks, also. For this thread to be helpful to the OP, the first question to be asked would have been what kind of bear are you referring to?


PS Did you really think Garrett would advise potential customers NOT to use hardcast bullets??

Oh yeah, and when you say "Ask any bear guide in the USA or Canada" you remind me a lot of someone who tells me that all scientists believe in man-caused global warming and if I don't then I'm stupid - In my experience people that make broad brush comments like that have little first-hand knowledge and are reaching for some "everybody agrees with me" statistic to bolster their case.

Larry,

I don't know why my post seems to have offended you so badly. I wasn't attacking you or your friend. I was merely making an observation based on 35 years of hunting big game from New Brunswick to Alaska, where I actually lived for a while.

In this quoted post you are actually the one making broad brush assumptions, and very incorrectly I might add. Re-read post #13.

I didn't "jump" to any conclusions. I have killed enough big and tough animals to know that penetration with a 240 grain HP on come what may shooting angles on a heavily boned and muscled animal like a bear is no where near as good as it needs to be to defend my life specifically, and anyone's in general. You are free to use what you want, and I encourage you to do so. Maybe you'll survive if attacked by a bear, maybe not. I believe in stacking the odds in my favor. When a bear is attacking, it is usually without warning, blindingly quick, and dead serious. If you are lucky enough to get off a shot before he is on you, and you are lucky enough to hit him, are you willing to bet your life that your bullet will penetrate adequately? What about if he is already on you, and you are able to get your gun out and up against him? Will that lighter weight hollowpoint penetrate enough to reach the vitals regardless of where your bullet strikes, and will it even penetrate at all at after expanding from impacting at muzzle velocity?

You stated that "Although it's possible to run into a huge Black Bear that might require more penetration than some 240 44 mag HPs give, it's more probable that you'll drop the average size (or even above average size) black in its tracks with that 240 grain slug than one which doesn't expand."

Got any proof or evidence to back this up?

Taking a cheap shot at me because someone made an inaccurate statement that was from Michigan, and I happen to now live in Michigan is childish, but easy to do when you're sitting behind a keyboard 1000 miles away. It doesn't serve any real purpose, or provide any real help to the board at large.

As far as Randy Garrett goes. I neither know him personally, nor owe him anything. I simply pointed out a person who has quite a bit of real world experience with large and sometimes dangerous game, who has found for himself that heavy bullets work better. If you have a problem with him because he happens to make cast bullets, maybe you should take it up with him. Try telling him he is wrong. Have you ever considered the idea that he might make heavy cast bullets for big and tough game because work better, and not the other way around as you seem to assume based on your comment here.

Global warming doesn't have anything to do with anything else here :rolleyes:. Asking a man who guides hunters for bear does, since they will have far more experience with them than either you or I. In all actuallity, most bear guides will tell you that they aren't in favor of having a handgun for bear backup anyway, but if you have to have one it should be loaded with something that will get the job done from any angle. I believe that if one ventures alone into the wilderness, they should pack one along. It beats a stick.

The one thing that we do agree on is that bears look exactly like a human when skinned. In fact, any body builder should be so lucky as to be built like that.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all the great info.

One of the reasons I asked about this, was an ammo review I read on midwayusa.com in reference to:

Buffalo Bore Ammunition 44 Remington Magnum +P+ 340 Grain Lead Flat Nose Gas Check Box of 20
Buffalo Bore Ammunition 44 Remington Magnum +P+ 340 Grain Lead Flat Nose Gas Check Box of 20 - MidwayUSA

This had me a little worried.
Matt G of Fairbanks, AK : Date posted: 8/4/2010

I bought these rounds for bear protection while moose hunting. I shot them in a super redhawk. For my pistol they did fine, at the range it has a 1.5" pattern at 25 yards which was outstanding. However, my buddy now has a .44 magnum S&W paper weight. He shot two rounds of it after I put 10 rounds through mine. The 2nd round he shot off seized the gun up solid and the gunsmith has deemed it a $900 paper weight. His S&W was sent back to the factory to see if they could repair it and had no luck freeing the cylinder and informed him that due to him using a round with pressures in excess of what S&W has rated the fire arm for they cannot help him. I would not recommend this round for anything other than Rugers and Freedom Arms

Dump-

The article says that "S&W says that since he used a load that exceeds what the S&W gun is designed for, that they can't help him".

Something there smells fishy to me. The BB 340 +P+ load is loaded to 43,500 CUP. That's the exact same pressure that was SAAMI spec for the .44 magnum from its inception in 1955, and was so up until a few years ago when SAAMI lowered it to 36,000 psi (roughly 40,000 cup, though there's no direct correlation between the two, nor anyway to precisely cross reference them). The guns are proofed at almost double that pressure to make sure they can withstand an accidental overload that could ruin their product and kill their customer.

Those rounds are normally too long to fit into a S&W cylinder and have it cycle correctly anyway. They will cause rapid wear to a S&W as I posted earlier. If you are interested in the straight skinny, call Tim Sundles at BB and talk to him.
 
Gun 4 Fun, I am " respectfully ' asking this sir. I have heard about the extra length of those Big Bore rounds, the Engineer in me is wondering, could that very well explain the seizing up and rendering the weapon useless, and not the actual +P+ rating of the load? Thank you very much, 26.
 
I know dump1567 was just posting a message he read, and I'm not saying he has tried to mislead anyone. I just want to make that clear to all.

26-

I can't answer you properly without seeing the gun for myself, but I thought the exact same thing when I read that little clip.

It just doesn't sound right to me. More like someone exaggerating a bit out of frustration. I have read many other posts by folks on other forums who have used the BB +P+ load in their S&W's without blowing them up. They just hadn't heard any different, or simply wanted to prove that they can be fired from an N frame even though they are supposed to be too long.

I haven't personally used that load, so I can't say whether or not it would fit one of mine, but I have both P&R, and non P&R 29's, and my non P&R guns will take a slightly longer COAL than the P&R guns will. The posts that I have read that say the round will fit in a 29 all used non recessed 29's. Either way, that would put the nose right at the front edge of the cylinder, and any crimp jump would cause the gun to be tied up for sure.

One other thing- I don't see where the clip says what model of 29 they were fired in. If it was a 329 (which are extremely popular in AK), then crimp jump is a certainty, and even BB warns agains certain loads of theirs being fired in them because of that fact.
 
Last edited:
I like my load of 10.0 grains of Unique behind a 250 grain cast bullet Lyman mold #429421. This is a nice load because you can get a couple of fast follow up shots, not super powerful but it was very accurate in my 4-inch Model 29.
 
That's a really good load David.

It's a mid-range load, but penetrates very well. I use that one all the time with both the 250 gr 429421, or a 300 gr wfn cast. The 300 grainers do 1070 from my 6" guns, and the 250's will run around 1100-1125.
The fact that the 300's do almost the same as the 250's is another reason why I like the heavy bullets. Fast follow up shots with a bullet that has the necessary weight and momentum to keep on plowing.
 
Last edited:
That's a really good load David.

It's a mid-range load, but penetrates very well. I use that one all the time with both the 250 gr 429421, or a 300 gr wfn cast. The 300 grainers do 1070 from my 6" guns, and the 250's will run around 1100-1125.
The fact that the 300's do almost the same as the 250's is another reason why I like the heavy bullets. Fast follow up shots with a bullet that has the necessary weight and momentum to keep on plowing.

Problem is that with a 4" 629 the 300 grain slugs give one hellofa recoil and muzzle jump. The quick second shot just isnt quick at all.

240 grains slugs work well. I just bought a box of 240 FMJ's that I intend on loading up. If they wont penetrate..nothing is going to.!

If Fred Bear can kill a Kodiak with a bow and arrow...I have no problem in "defending myself" from a black bear or a grizzly from the 48 states!
 
Problem is that with a 4" 629 the 300 grain slugs give one hellofa recoil and muzzle jump. The quick second shot just isnt quick at all.

240 grains slugs work well. I just bought a box of 240 FMJ's that I intend on loading up. If they wont penetrate..nothing is going to.!

If Fred Bear can kill a Kodiak with a bow and arrow...I have no problem in "defending myself" from a black bear or a grizzly from the 48 states!

No doubt Fred Bear was the real deal. He knew how to hunt and he knew how to get close, and shoot! He also was smart enough to have a guide with a high powered rifle along most of the time.

Your 240's may or may not penetrate straight. It depends more on their profile than their FMJ construction.


If you have never fired the 300's at the speeds I am getting from 10 grains of Unique, you should. They are easier to control than any factory full powered 240 load by a noticable degree.

Sully said:
It dont smell like tuna to me either!!!..

I'm not sure what you are saying here, since my post said that it does smell fishy.:confused:
 
Last edited:
No doubt Fred Bear was the real deal. He knew how to hunt and he knew how to get close, and shoot! He also was smart enough to have a guide with a high powered rifle along most of the time.

Your 240's may or may not penetrate straight. It depends more on their profile than their FMJ construction.


If you have never fired the 300's at the speeds I am getting from 10 grains of Unique, you should. They are easier to control than any factory full powered 240 load by a noticable degree.

I dont find the recoil and muzzle jump from factory loaded 240 gr slugs. And I dont intend on loading anything heavier than 240 ( + or - a few grains) . I have several bullet "designs" here and even purchased a few molds to cast a couple of styles...which I intend on loading with 2400 and blue dot and even some 231starting at or about 1200 FPS and working up to around 1500 fps.

But as you say Freddie was "the man" but he carried a 44Mag in a shoulder holster when bear hunting and of course a "guide" with a small cannon to back him up "just in case"
 
The lowest recoil "Bear protection" ammo for a 4" S&W is the Federal 300gr Cast Core.

Next up is the Buffalo Bore 255gr Low Recoil, and then the Garrett 44 Mag ammo suitable for the S&W.

If you do not reload any of the above will work great.

I have used all of them with no problems.
 
.44 Magnum Bear load

As you note, topic duplication is not Job 1, and checking the archives is wise. But - not to worry greatly - we love these bear load threads, and bear threads in general, as they produce many responses and much interest. Even though I do not hunt any more, I would never miss a bear thread! My Model 629s get nervous just thinking about 300 grain bullets, and my wrist is tightening as I type this.

And 'Welcome'.

Regards,

Dyson
 
Always love a good bear post!

Read the JJHack posts in this link: http://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2911043/m/21810798?r=43810798#43810798

I rate a hardcast in the same category as a FMJ. If you have any sense, you wouldn't go into combat with humans with a non-expanding FMJ, so why go into combat with a bear armed the same way? It will make a nice clean hole of whatever caliber the bullet is. It will KILL the animal eventually, but if you want to STOP the animal quickly, you should pick a bullet that is well constructed, but will yes, actually expand.

I am in big time black bear country, and load Hornaday XTP 240 grain for 2.5-4" barrels, and 300 grain for longer barrels.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the link Offroad. An informative read and it gives a lot of weight to his conclusions.

'Preciate it!

- Jay
 
A 250 grain cast bullet with a stout load of 2400, something like the old Lyman #429421. The .44 Magnum is plenty good enough for bear.
 
I'm smack in the middle of black bear country with the most reported kills reported. On my land during the summer I carry my 357mag snubbie for personal protection. The 44mag should be plenty of gun it's all about the shot placement.
 
AS A NOVICE HANDGUN HUNTER, I LEARNED MY LESSON ABOUT THE NEED TO USE HARDCAST BULLETS THAT CAN PENETRATE. MANY YEARS AGO, I WAS HUNTING LARGE BOAR, 300 LBS AND UP, WITH MY NEWLY PURCHASED 8" PYTHON IN .357 MAGNUM. A FRIEND OF MINE HAD AN IN AT COLT, AND I WAS ABLE TO GET ONE, WHILE THEY WERE BEING WRITTEN ABOUT IN THE GUN RAGGS, BUT HAD YET TO BE SEEN ON THE SHELVES. I WAS VERY EAGER TO TRY IT OUT. IT WAS A SPUR OF THE MOMENT THING, WITH LITTLE PREP, SO I RUSHED OUT TO MY LGS, AND PURCHASED THE HEAVIEST SWCHP AMMO ON THE SHELF, THE ONLY TYPE OF AMMMO HE CARRIED IN .357 MAGNUM. THE BRAND AND SPECS ESCAPE ME NOW, IN MY OLD AGE. A FRONTAL SHOT FROM 50 FT, FAILED TO PENETRATE THE THICK GRISTLE OF THE CHEST. QUICKLY REALIZING MY PROBLEM, MY SECOND ROUND COMPLETELY SHATTERED THE FRONT LEG. ON THREE LEGS, HE TURNED AWAY FROM ME AND CHARGED THE DOG, WHICH WAS A CLOSER TARGET. THAT GAVE ME AN ANGLED SIDE SHOT FROM THE REAR, INTO HIS CHEST AREA, THE BULLET FRAGMENTED AND DID A LOT OF DAMAGE. HE WENT DOWN, BUT HAD A DEATH GRIP ON THE DOGS NECK, THAT HE WAS SWINGING WILDLY, TRYING TO GUT WITH HIS LARGE TUSKS. TO GIVE CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE, THE DOG HAD HIS TEETH SUNK INTO THE BOARS NECK, ALSO. URGED ON BY THE GUIDE, WHO WAS ABOUT TO LOSE HIS DOG, (AND WAS ALSO ABOUT 4' UP A TREE) I BURST OUT OF MY COVER OF BRUSH AND FROM BEHIND, PUT A ROUND THROUGH HIS SPINE AT THE BASE OF HIS NECK. THAT ENDED THE STRUGGLE. THE DOG WENT TO THE VET AND LIVED, AFTER GETTING STITCHED UP. THE HOG WEIGHED 350 LBS. SWCHP IS DEFINITELY THE BEST MEDICINE FOR 2 LEGGED THREATS, BUT FOR WILD ANIMALS, ESPECIALLY BIG ONES IN A CHARGE AT YOU, YOU NEED A BIG HEAVY HARDCASTS THAT CAN PENETRATE, SMASH BONES, AND CAUSE MAJOR DAMAGE--SMASH THROUGH THE SKULL, PENETRATE AND TAKE OUT THE SPINE, OR SMASH THE PELVIS--SOMETHING THAT IS GOING TO STOP THE BEAST DEAD IN IT'S TRACKS. A HOLLOWPOINT WON'T ACCOMPLISH THIS, IMHO…..
 

Attachments

  • 10391666_106026986079464_3165469_n.jpg
    10391666_106026986079464_3165469_n.jpg
    36.4 KB · Views: 110
  • 10391666_106026989412797_3517141_n.jpg
    10391666_106026989412797_3517141_n.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 108
Last edited:
I know .44 really isn't adequate for bear. And I really don't plan on being in bear country,
Please explain to me when bears grew armor plating for skin??? Countless bear have been taken with a lot less than a .44 Magnum since before there was a .44 Magnum! :rolleyes:

ANY .44 Magnum ammo manufactured compliant with SAAMI specs will be perfectly safe in your revolver as long as the revolver is in good operating condition.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top