Modern .22 long out of an antique revolver?

R

rlee1976

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
202
Reaction score
5
Location
Pennsylvania
Hi fellas. Don't know if this really belongs in this forum or this section of the forum, but I get the best and fastest responses here, so I wanted to ask, can I shoot modern .22 long (not long rifle, just long) out of an old Columbian Baby Hammerless (.22 long) revolver? The revolver was made approximately from 1893-1898, by the company that would eventually become Kolb and then Sedgley. I've read that smokeless powder was introduced in the .22 caliber ammunition in 1887, but does that mean that all .22 ammo would have been smokeless by 1893, or would my Columbian still have been manufactured for black powder pressures? If not modern .22 long, could I shoot modern .22 short out of it? The guy I'm buying it from says he shot .22 long rifle out of it. Maybe he got his nomenclature wrong and it was actually .22 long, as LR shouldn't fit? Thanks for your input fellas and gals.
 
Register to hide this ad
IF you value an older gun, don't push it. What I'd suggest is you buy some CB Longs. They're just CCI rounds that use long cases and CB cap bullets. No powder, just a healthy priming charge to propel the bullet. They're fun and quiet to use. No pressure issues at all.

Probably safer than using modern shorts, surely easier on the gun than Hi Speed shorts.
 
Check out Aguila .22 Super Colibri also. Primer propelled and quite accurate at short range.
 
A CB cap and BB cap are very similar. CB stands for conical bullet, and BB is just a BB or round ball. They're loaded in standard shape cases, only the European ones are very short. CCI initiated the use of the long case and the conical bullets. They all just use a healthy priming charge. Its more than adequate to propel the bullet at or above pellet gun speeds. Very quiet and I assume no pressure to speak of. Kind of expensive, but no more than brand name ammo.

Many people use them for pest control in urban area's where noise might become an issue. They're reasonably accurate from a rifle out to at least 100' (the outside I've tested them). I think you'll be pleased.
 
These sound like just the ticket. Where can I get them, someplace like Midway or Brownell's? I saw a picture of the European ones with the very short cases on wikipedia, will they work as well? Thanks all.
 
Found 'em at Midway. Well, now that we've established that these would be best out of my old gun, anyone have the answer to my original question? Would .22 long ammo mfg. circa 1893 have been smokeless or black powder, and would most .22 revolvers have been built to handle smokeless? Thanks.
 
.22 Long ammo doesn't develop nearly as much pressure as .22 LR does. I'm betting today's .22 L is just fine for your rifle. Even though that rifle was developed in Black Powder times I'm sure it was fired over the past 100+ years with smokeless .22 L ammo. Like I said, the pressure in .22 L ammo is nowhere near as high as in .22 LR ammo. The only reason .22 L ammo is still being made is for those old rifles.
 
Arch, it's a revolver, but that probably doesn't make a difference. I wonder if I used modern .22 short (regular velocity) in my .22 long revolver, would that lower pressure be similar to or less than the pressure of a .22 long black powder round? For that matter, would that be similar to shooting .32 S&W shorts out of an old .32 S&W long revolver to be on the safe side? Know what I mean?
 
rlee1976 said:
Arch, it's a revolver, but that probably doesn't make a difference. I wonder if I used modern .22 short (regular velocity) in my .22 long revolver, would that lower pressure be similar to or less than the pressure of a .22 long black powder round? For that matter, would that be similar to shooting .32 S&W shorts out of an old .32 S&W long revolver to be on the safe side? Know what I mean?
Click to expand...

I believe if you will google ".22 rimfire pressure", you may reconsider using any of it in your revolver, except for the loads previously discussed. To me, it would not be worth taking the chance when there are readily available alternatives.

Good luck.
 
rlee1976 said:
Would .22 long ammo mfg. circa 1893 have been smokeless or black powder, and would most .22 revolvers have been built to handle smokeless? Thanks.
Click to expand...


Winchester produced this type of black powder .22 Long up to the 1920's. They loaded .22's with Lesmok powder (a blend of BP and smokeless) well beyond then.

I would take rburg's advice.

000_6566.jpg

000_6562.jpg


How about some pictures of the Columbian Baby Hammerless? :)
 
Not to beat a dead horse, I mean I probably will just use the cb caps, but is the modern .22 short pressure considerably less than black powder .22 long? Thanks guys.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

chief38
Got a HUGE thrill out at the range today!
Replies
0
Views
438
chief38
chief38
Fishinfool
.22 Rimfire Revolver Musings
2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Riposte1
R
glowe
  • Locked
**SOLD** 22 Hand Ejector, 2nd Model, Ladysmith #9805
Replies
1
Views
529
CalifEd
C
ddeanjohnson
For Sale WTS: 16 guns -- all offers respectfully considered -- collection liquidation
2
Replies
35
Views
21K
Heinz
Heinz
BB57
Thoughts on the new Winchester Ranger .22 Lever action.
Replies
1
Views
17K
walnutred
W

Latest posts

Back
Top