Church Security Calibers

Joined
May 21, 2003
Messages
11,670
Reaction score
17,791
Location
DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Hi:
I am a new member of a church security unit.
Several members are retired LEO.
The main purpose is security in the main sanctuary. The building is one story.
The sanctuary is approx. 75 feet from main door to pulpit and approx. 75 feet wide.
The sanctuary is normally full on Sunday mornings.

To my mind, over penetration is a main concern in the event that an active shooter has to be dealt with.

A large slow moving handgun bullet is what I am thinking ?

Consideration :
1. .38 spl hollow base wad cutter bullet reversed with hollow base outward
2. .38 spl fragmentation round
3. .44 spl HP
4. .45 acp 185 gr HP

Opinions ??

Thanks
Jimmy
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Hi:
I am a new member of a church security unit.
Several members are retired LEO.
The main purpose is security in the main sanctuary. The building is one story.
The sanctuary is approx. 75 feet from main door to pulpit and approx. 75 feet wide.
The sanctuary is normally full on Sunday mornings.

To my mind, over penetration is a main concern in the event that an active shooter has to be dealt with.

A large slow moving handgun bullet is what I am thinking ?

Consideration :
1. .38 spl hollow base wad cutter bullet reversed with hollow base outward
2. .38 spl fragmentation round
3. .44 spl HP
4. .45 acp 185 gr HP

Opinions ??

Thanks
Jimmy

Yeah, a large slow moving bullet would be easily seen and give people time to get out of the way.
 
My .02

Frangible ammo is not effective, hence why it is not carried by LEO. Test after test has proven this.

I would carry the ammo LE carries and not worry about over penetration. Your main goal is to stop the threat, Period. Then focus on PROFICIENCY.

My suggestion is 9mm duty ammo. Easy recoil and easy to handle.

The Presumptive Hazards of Over-Penetration
Failures to stop a suspect because of under-penetration, poor bullet placement, and completely missing the target are far more significant problems than over-penetration. With shots to the center of mass, if a handgun or rifle bullet fails to have enough penetration to reach the large blood bearing vessels and organs in the torso, rapid physiological incapacitation is unlikely and an opponent may remain a lethal threat to officers and citizen bystanders. Conversely, if a bullet fired by officers completely penetrates a violent criminal and exits downrange, the bullet will certainly have had enough penetration to reach the large blood bearing vessels or organs in the torso. As a result, it is more likely to have caused sufficient hemorrhage to induce hypovolemic shock--the only reliable method of physiological incapacitation in the absence of CNS trauma.

Unfortunately, according to the available published date, the majority of shots fired in the field by U.S. LE officers miss their intended target. According to published NYPD SOP-9 data, the NYPD hit ratio by officers against perpetrators in 2000 was 12.3% of shots fired and in 2001 13.5% of shots fired. The Miami Metro-Dade County PD had hit ratios ranging between 15.4% and 30% from 1988-1994. Portland PD reported hits with 43% of shots fired at adversaries from 1984-1992, while Baltimore PD reported a 49% average hit ratio from 1989-2002.

Given that the reported averages for LE officers actually hitting the suspect ranges between 12% to 49% of shots fired, more concern should be given to the between 51-88% of shots fired by LE officers which completely MISS the intended target and immediately result in a significant threat to any person down range, rather than excessively worry about the relatively rare instance where one of the 12%-49% of shots fired actually hits the intended target and then exits the perpetrator in a fashion which still poses a hazard.

In short, the consequences of projectile under-penetration are far more likely to get officers and citizens killed than over-penetration issues.

Pretty much anything on this list:

9 mm:
Barnes XPB 105 & 115 gr JHP (copper bullet)
Federal Tactical 124 gr JHP (LE9T1)
Speer Gold Dot 124 gr +P JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 124 gr +P JHP (RA9124TP)
Winchester Partition Gold 124 gr JHP (RA91P)
Winchester Ranger-T 127 gr +P+ JHP (RA9TA)
Federal Tactical 135 gr +P JHP (LE9T5)
Federal HST 147 gr JHP (P9HST2)
Remington Golden Saber 147 gr JHP (GS9MMC)
Speer Gold Dot 147 gr JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 147 gr JHP (RA9T)
Winchester 147 gr bonded JHP (RA9B/Q4364)

.40 S&W:
Barnes XPB 140 & 155 gr JHP (copper bullet)
Speer Gold Dot 155 gr JHP
Federal Tactical 165 gr JHP (LE40T3)
Winchester Ranger-T 165 gr JHP (RA40TA)
Winchester Partition Gold 165 gr JHP (RA401P)
Federal HST 180 gr JHP (P40HST1)
Federal Tactical 180 gr JHP (LE40T1)
Remington Golden Saber 180 gr JHP (GS40SWB)
Speer Gold Dot 180 gr JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 180 gr JHP (RA40T)
Winchester 180 gr bonded JHP (RA40B/Q4355/S40SWPDB1)

.45 ACP:
Barnes XPB 160 & 185 gr JHP (copper bullet)
Federal HST 230 gr JHP (P45HST2)
Federal HST 230 gr +P JHP (P45HST1)
Federal Tactical 230 gr JHP (LE45T1)
Speer Gold Dot 230 gr JHP
Speer Gold Dot 230 gr +P JHP
Winchester Ranger-T 230 gr JHP (RA45T)
Winchester Ranger-T 230 gr +P JHP (RA45TP)
 
Last edited:
There is no magic bullet that makes shooting in a room full of people any safer.
If there is someone who needs to be shot the time has come they need to be put down pronto. To be put down pronto the person shooting needs to be well trained and needs to be shooting whatever they shoot the best with the most effective factory defensive round that gun will shoot.
 
5600 sq feet..... "several hundred"???? panicking folks..........god bless you trying to shoot in that kind of mess............


Unless everyone hits the floor...... IMHO the only "safe" shots would be with the gun under his chin or in contact with the back of his head......... shooting up.

The world really needs a Phaser "set on stun"...................

That said..................... how about a


Taser..... backup with the old FBI load.



Edit: something in 9mm 148gr load..... with a suppressor ...... might be nice
 
Last edited:
5.56

Your primary concerns in preventing injuries to innocents are accuracy and adequate penetration. Missing and directly shooting someone is a far greater concern than over-penetration and bullet effectiveness varies wildly with shot placement. The important body structures are buried deep within the torso and bullets need to be able to penetrate deep enough from any reasonable angle to damage them. Under-penetration results in ineffective hits even with perfect shot placement. The more rapidly you incapacitate the attacker(s) the fewer shots both you and the attacker(s) can fire and the safer everyone is.

Since long guns provide much improved accuracy vs. speed, terminal potential, and soft armor penetration I would choose carbine or SBR AR15s with a quality load.

If you want to stick to pistols then 9mm with a load off the list posted earlier. I believe that 9 is the best available compromise between accuracy, speed, capacity, cost, and terminal potential.

No matter what you choose prevention and proficiency are most important. Get something decent then focus your firearm resources on training.
 
5.56

Your primary concerns in preventing injuries to innocents are accuracy and adequate penetration. Missing and directly shooting someone is a far greater concern than over-penetration and bullet effectiveness varies wildly with shot placement. The important body structures are buried deep within the torso and bullets need to be able to penetrate deep enough from any reasonable angle to damage them. Under-penetration results in ineffective hits even with perfect shot placement. The more rapidly you incapacitate the attacker(s) the fewer shots both you and the attacker(s) can fire and the safer everyone is.

Since long guns provide much improved accuracy vs. speed, terminal potential, and soft armor penetration I would choose carbine or SBR AR15s with a quality load.

If you want to stick to pistols then 9mm with a load off the list posted earlier. I believe that 9 is the best available compromise between accuracy, speed, capacity, cost, and terminal potential.

No matter what you choose prevention and proficiency are most important. Get something decent then focus your firearm resources on training.

I'm just gonna throw this out there, that it is just barely possible that having an usher staff carrying AR's with three point slings in the foyer is gonna put a damper on attendance . . .

Carry what you'd carry to protect you and yours in the grocery store. Stay safe . . .
 
I would look at 44 spl loads used by early air marshals, and what they fired it out of. My choice would be an early Taurus M-441 5 shot 4 inch. It has the best short double action that I have experienced, and is a very high quality piece.
 
I would look at 44 spl loads used by early air marshals, and what they fired it out of. My choice would be an early Taurus M-441 5 shot 4 inch. It has the best short double action that I have experienced, and is a very high quality piece.

I didn't know the words "Taurus" and "high quality" could be used in the same sentence.
 
I'm just gonna throw this out there, that it is just barely possible that having an usher staff carrying AR's with three point slings in the foyer is gonna put a damper on attendance . . .

Carry what you'd carry to protect you and yours in the grocery store. Stay safe . . .
You're no fun.

I agree. Except for expecting security to be carrying a full-size pistol instead of a sub-compact (i.e. M&P9 vs. Shield) don't change your pistol and ammunition selection criteria from normal duty/self-defense considerations.
 
^^^^^^^^
What he said. I was thinking the same thing, I suspect attendance might take a pretty good hit when the fellow passing the collection plate is toting an AK47!
If it's good enough for home protection it's probably good enough for Sunday Service.
 
I'm just gonna throw this out there, that it is just barely possible that having an usher staff carrying AR's with three point slings in the foyer is gonna put a damper on attendance . . .

Carry what you'd carry to protect you and yours in the grocery store. Stay safe . . .


.....Mini - 14 with a hunting sling , maybe with a deer's head on it ?.....
 
Jimmyj, I would consider what you carried and was the most proficient when in law enforcement . I would also only use factory ammo . The question of hand loads for defense is controversial . Massad Ayoob claims it is a liability threat , others not so much . You would have to decide that yourself . No matter the caliber , shot placement is king !
 
I would also go with common sense. There is no special ammo for shooting into a crowd, and the innocent-target-rich environment is really not much different from a movie theater, a restaurant, a mall, or other venue.

Overpenetration is much less of a realistic concern than simply missing with some of your shots, so pick an effective self-defense caliber and round which you can shoot accurately and practice a lot.

And make sure all your church security team members know CPR and how to operate the fire extinguishers. Probability-wise, you're still much more likely to need that than your guns.
 
Is it just me who feels having to talk about an armed security response team at church is "weird"? I guess times are changing, and not necessarily for the better.

Is there an elevated position in the church where someone could hide, with a scoped rifle? Maybe using a piece of one way glass to hide behind, so as not to upset the parishioners? Might be a good option.

Larry
 
Jimmy,

You pose an interesting task. Back when I was teaching, I tried to address the same dilemma with securing my classroom during a lock down. I think that there needs to be more considered than what you have offered.

What is the construction of the sanctuary's walls? Most churches I have been in have had either stone and concrete or cinder block and either wood or drywall walls. If your church has stone and/or concrete, you have to fear the risk of richochets. Are there windows or stained glass built into the walls? Is there a risk if someone sprayed the sanctuary from outside, of the rounds penetrating the walls?

Can I presume that you are preparing for an incident that is not the result of members of the congregation? What is the likelihood that your church could be targeted?

As much as I like the concept of wadcutters, they are definitely off the list of viable munitions. Your defenders are opening themselves up to unwanted legal action if they use inverted HBWCs. Speedloading wadcutters could cost valuable time. I think that JHP ammo, or SWC ammo, is the only option that is realistically open to you.

Realistically, you want to be shooting outward, away from the sanctuary. The only inbound projectiles should be coming from those that you deem as the threat. You have no control over what the threat is shooting.

I have some ideas on how to approach your church's security, but I wouldn't want to give anyone ideas. I don't envy you your task.
 
Funny thread. I have pastored a church for over 30 years. I carry the gun. A Smith M10 with 38 semi-wadcutters. Yup, right on my gun belt in plain sight anytime I am in or around the church. I am the one up front with a clear view of the entry doors. The congregation has its back to the doors. I don't. Your pastor needs to man up if doesn't carry in church. Now, this is not say my people don't also carry. There are at least two besides me who are armed during the service. I wouldn't hesitate to keep an AR-15 platform rifle in the pulpit. Just haven't done it yet.
 
Last edited:
9, 40, 45. Pick one, buy some federal HST, and stop worrying about anything else
 
Back
Top