Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Concealed Carry & Self Defense

Notices

Concealed Carry & Self Defense All aspects of Concealed and Open Carry, Home and Self Defense.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-16-2024, 11:05 AM
Mr. Vito Mr. Vito is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times in 12 Posts
Default Does the 642 still make sense?

For many years my 642 in a Desantis pocket holster has been my "go to" gun for concealed carry. I don't carry while in my home, and it was just so easy to grab the 642 and put it into my front right pocket as I was leaving. But lately I find I am having capacity anxiety, thinking that it is foolish to be limited to 5 rounds of 38+, especially if I honest with myself that my accuracy with this short barreled revolver is pretty much limited to bad breath distances from my attacker. Sometimes instead I carry my Glock 26 with its 10+1 capacity in an OWB holster, but it sure is not as concealable and convenient as the trusty 642. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 01-16-2024, 11:35 AM
Breakaway500's Avatar
Breakaway500 Breakaway500 is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Whiskey Hill Ma.
Posts: 2,811
Likes: 16,237
Liked 9,122 Times in 1,981 Posts
Default

My 642 goes along with me often. If I need more than 5 rounds I should have stayed home,and an extra 5 or even 10 rounds most probably will still be in my magazine when they find it in my cold dead hands.
__________________
My Daddy was a pistol..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-16-2024, 11:42 AM
kmk008 kmk008 is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Colorado
Posts: 58
Likes: 66
Liked 107 Times in 38 Posts
Default

I carry a 642 and a Bodyguard 380 frequently. Why? Because in many cases it’s the difference of me carrying at all. Both of them ride in a Desantis Nemesis pocket holster and over time I’ve started to favor the 380 because it’s even a touch smaller and lighter.

I’ve never been too concerned about capacity with either because to me it’s a close range escape tool. Both of them have enough firepower at 3yd or less range and can likely buy me time to get out of whatever situation I’m in.

Occasionally I’ll carry a P99 or 4006, but if that was all I had I wouldn’t be carrying nearly as much given my clothing and environment in daily settings.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 01-16-2024, 11:54 AM
Goldstar225 Goldstar225 is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Austin, AR
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 1,621
Liked 2,425 Times in 750 Posts
Default

Though my Shield plus is my primary EDC my 642 isn't going anywhere. It was my backup gun during my working days and still goes into my pocket on occasion. I'm confident with it to 15 yards and at 25 still pose a threat though those distances are unlikely to be an issue.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 01-16-2024, 11:58 AM
Ingramite's Avatar
Ingramite Ingramite is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 429
Likes: 1,391
Liked 942 Times in 295 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Vito View Post
For many years my 642 in a Desantis pocket holster has been my "go to" gun for concealed carry. I don't carry while in my home, and it was just so easy to grab the 642 and put it into my front right pocket as I was leaving. But lately I find I am having capacity anxiety, thinking that it is foolish to be limited to 5 rounds of 38+, especially if I honest with myself that my accuracy with this short barreled revolver is pretty much limited to bad breath distances from my attacker. Sometimes instead I carry my Glock 26 with its 10+1 capacity in an OWB holster, but it sure is not as concealable and convenient as the trusty 642. Thoughts?
Many days when I don't feel like "strapping up" it's my 442. I carry it with a DeSantis Clip Grip.

The arguments for high capacity in a personal defense weapon is a never ending push from people selling high capacity firearms. It's as simple as that. If it wasn't compelling, they wouldn't be very good at their jobs.

It's not just high capacity but whatever is the latest and the greatest. The push to black plastic and optics is all you see on the internet from "influencers". These people will also sell you a spot in their training classes so that you too can be "tactical" in all you do and think.

The use of "Fantasy Gun Fight Scenario" is the hook they pull you in with. It goes like this: "Suppose you're in a shopping mall and a shooter is XXX yards away?" Could you make that shot to take him out?

The reality? My reality? In 50+ years of carrying a firearm, as a Police Officer and then as a private citizen, I have never had to fire a SINGLE shot.

What do statistics tell us? You know....but the pull for these high capacity firearms is strong. I get it, and sure, I have succumbed myself. I have these high capacity firearms myself. BUT what I won't do is dismiss the utilitarian use of the J frame in total.

Over the years my various J Frames have served me very well and will continue to do so. I'd hate to be without 1 or 2 of them.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-16-2024, 02:12 PM
dubshooter dubshooter is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 544
Likes: 136
Liked 1,044 Times in 311 Posts
Default

The old argument of “multiple attackers” gets me. If you’re getting robbed by 4 guys with guns, can you quickly shoot all 4 of them before they shoot you, despite how many bullets you have?

I carry what makes sense. Most of the time I’m more worried about a stray dog or coyote trying to attack my dog or daughter than I am getting robbed
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-16-2024, 02:30 PM
noonster noonster is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: NE OH
Posts: 84
Likes: 2
Liked 64 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Wild hogs travel in big groups. Local thugs hang around in groups - nobody wants to have thre first hole. Et cet.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 01-16-2024, 02:55 PM
aphelion's Avatar
aphelion aphelion is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 674
Likes: 963
Liked 793 Times in 266 Posts
Default

People should carry whatever they like and are comfortable with, of course. The odds that you will have to shoot in defense of yourself or others are extremely small. But if you choose to carry, it is a tacit admission that you are considering you may have to. That said, I'll be willing to put money on Elisjsha Dicken being glad he wasn't armed with a snubnose J-frame on July 17, 2022.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 01-16-2024, 02:59 PM
hdfinder47 hdfinder47 is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 308
Likes: 105
Liked 290 Times in 102 Posts
Default

Carried a J frame light weight variant with a speed loader as a back up and off duty EDC for many years. Now carry a P365 with an extra mag. Completely comfortable (comforted) with either but shoot the 365 better at 15-25 yards and do like the extra capacity. Agree that I'll likely never need the extra capacity - guess I just bought in to the hype.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 01-16-2024, 03:02 PM
NYlakesider's Avatar
NYlakesider NYlakesider is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern NY-AdirondackMts
Posts: 8,086
Likes: 13,058
Liked 13,539 Times in 5,116 Posts
Default

I carry a Ruger LCR.38 in a pocket holster. I understand what you say about 5 shots. I have had that debate and I carry the little gun only when going into a area/time I feel comfortable. At 78 I'm not doing any late night bar hopping and for the most part not going in harms way. I consider myself quite street wise and avoid most bad situations. FWIW I now live rural.

Of course I know bad things can happen anywhere any time but I spent a lot of time thinking about it. Lets be realistic it will probable not be utilized unless something unusual pops up.

If going out of my self imposed safe zone or bad things are happening I will move up to one of my .45s with a spare magazine.
__________________
14 S&W Revs none with locks!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 01-16-2024, 03:06 PM
quinn's Avatar
quinn quinn is offline
SWCA Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 11,163
Liked 12,134 Times in 1,942 Posts
Default

I'm of the 'escape tool' clan. The only time I ever discharged my 340pd was dealing with an attaching Rhodesian Ridgeback... even then I think the muzzle blast was the most effective aspect. JMHO
__________________
Randy
Provenance nerd
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 01-16-2024, 03:09 PM
smithman 10's Avatar
smithman 10 smithman 10 is offline
US Veteran
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 751
Likes: 2,242
Liked 1,242 Times in 372 Posts
Default Just look real mean and nasty

When confronted by nasty ole hoodlums. No one wants to deal with a stubborn (and maybe crazy) geezerman.

He might shoot you or something.

With his 642!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-16-2024, 03:39 PM
Mercury's Avatar
Mercury Mercury is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 378
Likes: 571
Liked 350 Times in 143 Posts
Default

Mr. Vito, you're covered according to the Rule of Threes:

Three yards, three rounds, three seconds.
.....most gunfights involving civilians and felons takes place at a distance of approximately three to five yards, approximately three and one-half rounds are fired, and no further shooting takes place after approximately three seconds. I believe that this is based on FBI stats but this quote comes from:
The Rule Of Threes

As most civilian's defensive use of a firearm fall into these parameters, feeling adequately prepared for an encounter is dependent on one's personal risk assessment.
Many still feel prepared with a 5-shot J frame while others have opted for an auto that has higher capacity. As it is said, YMMV.

I guess we all should just go with what we feel is best for our own circumstances and hope that we never need to find out.

I will add that leaving a higher capacity gun at home because it's heavier or a little too big, does no good.

Last edited by Mercury; 01-16-2024 at 03:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #14  
Old 01-16-2024, 03:47 PM
rockquarry rockquarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,590
Likes: 4
Liked 8,935 Times in 4,144 Posts
Default

A J-frame is plenty accurate at 25 yards, but many shooters don't do well beyond a short distance with a J-frame. Plenty of practice will take care of that. When you're capable of shooting a J-frame well at distance, all the other guns become surprisingly easier to shoot well.
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #15  
Old 01-16-2024, 04:12 PM
kmk008 kmk008 is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Colorado
Posts: 58
Likes: 66
Liked 107 Times in 38 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockquarry View Post
A J-frame is plenty accurate at 25 yards, but many shooters don't do well beyond a short distance with a J-frame. Plenty of practice will take care of that. When you're capable of shooting a J-frame well at distance, all the other guns become surprisingly easier to shoot well.
I remember HATING the DAO trigger when I first got it. After awhile I became surprisingly accurate with it and have grown to like DAO triggers for what they are. It definitely feels like a badge of honor to shoot a small double action gun well.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 01-16-2024, 04:17 PM
Dvus Dvus is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 814
Likes: 22
Liked 1,914 Times in 467 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hdfinder47 View Post
Carried a J frame light weight variant with a speed loader as a back up and off duty EDC for many years. Now carry a P365 with an extra mag. Completely comfortable (comforted) with either but shoot the 365 better at 15-25 yards and do like the extra capacity. Agree that I'll likely never need the extra capacity - guess I just bought in to the hype.
It's no hype when you can carry 12 rounds in roughly the same size package weighing just a couple of ounces more and a better chance of putting them where you need them. These are exactly the reasons that I semi-retired my J frame and went with my P365.
Rockquarry makes an excellent point about practice, and then makes the argument FOR
something else with his statement that "all the other guns become surprisingly easier to shoot well."

Last edited by Dvus; 01-16-2024 at 04:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #17  
Old 01-16-2024, 04:24 PM
Yaworski's Avatar
Yaworski Yaworski is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 876
Likes: 202
Liked 1,178 Times in 471 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ingramite View Post
The use of "Fantasy Gun Fight Scenario" is the hook they pull you in with. It goes like this: "Suppose you're in a shopping mall and a shooter is XXX yards away?" Could you make that shot to take him out?
What I call "Walter Mitty Syndrome." Far too many guys prepare for getting into a pitched gun battle with an armed gang while having dinner at a restaurant.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #18  
Old 01-16-2024, 04:29 PM
Yaworski's Avatar
Yaworski Yaworski is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 876
Likes: 202
Liked 1,178 Times in 471 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aphelion View Post
That said, I'll be willing to put money on Elisjsha Dicken being glad he wasn't armed with a snubnose J-frame on July 17, 2022.
I can't find the video but the other day I saw a Youtube video of a guy ringing steel plates with a Charter Arms Undercover at 25 yards.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #19  
Old 01-16-2024, 04:35 PM
Yaworski's Avatar
Yaworski Yaworski is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 876
Likes: 202
Liked 1,178 Times in 471 Posts
Default

A hammerless revolver can be fired from inside of a pocket without jamming.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-16-2024, 04:36 PM
Baltimoreed11754's Avatar
Baltimoreed11754 Baltimoreed11754 is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 636
Liked 2,043 Times in 710 Posts
Default

Watching too much John Wick imo. My theory about driving anywhere is to go from point A to point B and back again without any interaction with other drivers or the HP. My theory about my edc [either a J frame or a Colt Mustang] is to carry it every day, even in my own home, and never have to use it. Practicing defensive driving and situational awareness is absolutely necessary to do those two things. To quote Sgt Esterhaus ‘Hey, Lets be careful out there’.

Last edited by Baltimoreed11754; 01-16-2024 at 04:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-16-2024, 05:35 PM
ISCS Yoda's Avatar
ISCS Yoda ISCS Yoda is offline
US Veteran
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 2,499
Liked 13,205 Times in 4,578 Posts
Default

Between situational awareness, defensive driving, learning to point shoot, and not walking around where you shouldn't, a 5 shot J frame is likely all that you will ever need. I don't like Airweights so I carry a M649 virtually every day except when I KNOW that I am going to be someplace that could be a target (house of worship leads the list). The I break out a 9mm with more cartridges but I still stick to smaller guns.
__________________
Come and take it!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #22  
Old 01-16-2024, 05:37 PM
rockquarry rockquarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,590
Likes: 4
Liked 8,935 Times in 4,144 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dvus View Post
It's no hype when you can carry 12 rounds in roughly the same size package weighing just a couple of ounces more and a better chance of putting them where you need them. These are exactly the reasons that I semi-retired my J frame and went with my P365.
Rockquarry makes an excellent point about practice, and then makes the argument FOR
something else with his statement that "all the other guns become surprisingly easier to shoot well."
Perhaps I didn't say that well.

I would guess we all shoot more than one gun when we make our frequent trips to the gun range. Just my personal experience, but I've found that regular practice with a J-frame at 25 yards has helped me to shoot better with larger guns.

J-frames are very unforgiving when it comes to grip, firmness of grip, sighting, and adapting and becoming accustomed to a stout trigger pull (or at least it it feels that way) in a small, lighweight revolver. Consistency with all the above factors helps develop a shooter's skill.

When you revert to shooting a larger-framed heavier gun, you carry over the shooting discipline acquired with the more difficult J-frame.

Based on my own results, that's as simple as I can explain it.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-16-2024, 06:46 PM
Lucnic's Avatar
Lucnic Lucnic is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 64
Likes: 139
Liked 67 Times in 37 Posts
Default

All I carry anymore is a J Frame, either a 640 OWB or a 642 pocket. I’ve got Glock, Sig, Springfield etc. But a J Frame just fits my lifestyle better. I’ve even tried to like my Kimber K6s. I shoot it well, it’s dependable but I just can’t warm up to it. So I’ve decided if a J Frame and a speed strip can’t get me out of the situation, today just isn’t my day.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #24  
Old 01-16-2024, 06:48 PM
pasound's Avatar
pasound pasound is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 1,609
Liked 2,853 Times in 1,150 Posts
Default

My Model 38 with a DeSantis Clip Grip is my go to for walking out the door. It's a 1983 classic humpback, and the DA trigger is butter smooth. They built them like that 40 years ago. It nickel, and has almost no turn line. A policeman's ankle backup during it's first life. My practice shooter is a 637, and I've fired and dry-fired it enough that the DA is smooth, but still not up to the old builds. Practicing with it makes the occasional cylinder with the 38 even easier, as it pulls through even smoother.
__________________
Heavily armed old man.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #25  
Old 01-16-2024, 07:11 PM
SmithSwede SmithSwede is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Terrell, Texas
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Liked 246 Times in 22 Posts
Default

I think there are two separate questions here. Capacity and accuracy.

As to capacity, I don’t think there is much need to worry about having “only” 5 or 6 shots, provided you can shoot well.

But you also seem to be saying you don’t have confidence you can shoot the J frame well. To that question I’d say either practice more with the J frame. Or carry something else you can shoot better—not because it has higher capacity.

Whatever you do, don’t get so tangled up in the details that you stop carrying regularly. Having the gun when you need it is 99% of the solution.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #26  
Old 01-16-2024, 07:47 PM
Walter Rego Walter Rego is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 1,527
Liked 5,592 Times in 1,613 Posts
Default

I carry a Model 640 sometimes. Light weight in a carry gun isn't important to me, as long as it is lighter than around 30 ounces anyway. Comfort in carrying is most important.

I know the polymer framed autoloaders are popular due to light weight and mag capacity but for a legally armed civilian vs. a law enforcement officer, the probability of needing to fire more than a few shots and needing a reload are slim. The current thinking seems to be if one needs to shoot an attacker, then they need to have a mag dump applied to them. This is why so many police shootings seem to involve having 15 or more shots fired. If you have limited capacity maybe you'll place your shots better.

I find it ludicrous how so many CCW holders feel the need to gear up with a 17 shot Glock plus two spare mags, a Surefire light, a folding knife, a can of pepper spray and a tourniquet or first aid kit all on their belt before leaving the house.
Oh, and that Glock needs to have an RMR and attached weapon light or laser too. People are watching too much TV.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #27  
Old 01-16-2024, 07:51 PM
Bill In Texas Bill In Texas is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Home is Texas.
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 3,410
Liked 1,408 Times in 847 Posts
Default

I've recently made some concessions for capacity. My edc for years was a 640. We bonded well. I liked the weight of the stainless steel. I mostly carried it in my right front pocket, but also occasionally on my hip.

My backup to the 640 was a 642. Same manual of arms, just a little lighter.

Lately my edc has changed to my 1st generation Shield in .40 s&w. This was my daily prior to acquiring the 640. It has never failed me and my capacity went up from 5 to 7. The 642 remains as my bug.

As a revolver guy I do have some guilt over the change, but with a spare mag in my pocket, I have 2 reloads instead of one, with the extra benefit of a couple more rounds. The weight between the Shield and the 640 is about the same, so I can still carry it in a pocket or on my hip.

Not to lose track of the topic though, the 642 remains my bug through this change. It is so easy to drop in a pocket to go out and gets used for that reason and more.

Last edited by Bill In Texas; 01-16-2024 at 08:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #28  
Old 01-16-2024, 07:59 PM
Max-BB Max-BB is online now
Member
Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sherman, SD USA
Posts: 184
Likes: 104
Liked 76 Times in 28 Posts
Default

Yes to answer your question.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #29  
Old 01-16-2024, 08:04 PM
bovw's Avatar
bovw bovw is offline
US Veteran
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: VA
Posts: 417
Likes: 190
Liked 249 Times in 120 Posts
Default

I sure hope so. Out of town this weekend with a snub model 10 and a 642-1. One speed strip, one J speed loader, two K speed loaders.
__________________
Dave
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #30  
Old 01-16-2024, 08:12 PM
johngalt's Avatar
johngalt johngalt is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St. Paul (smokey!) MN
Posts: 5,357
Likes: 1,459
Liked 6,729 Times in 2,579 Posts
Default

For some entertaining reading on the subject, look up user Univibe.
__________________
Common sense isn't so common.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 01-16-2024, 08:20 PM
haywood's Avatar
haywood haywood is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. Ohio
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 9,442
Liked 2,731 Times in 999 Posts
Default

Most of the time a J-Frame is in my pocket and a 9mm is in my waist. On occasion I will carry just one of them but, usually it’s both of them.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg C1EEFC11-FA9C-4A52-83D9-AC22D28894E9.jpg (63.7 KB, 32 views)
__________________
Two Handguns every day
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #32  
Old 01-16-2024, 08:58 PM
Super Trucker Super Trucker is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: MI.
Posts: 295
Likes: 56
Liked 113 Times in 56 Posts
Default

A J-Frame is a great BUG, there is zero chance I would rely on one for primary though. 5 rounds was Ok in the 60's but today, nope.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #33  
Old 01-16-2024, 09:30 PM
SGT ROCK 11B SGT ROCK 11B is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 826
Likes: 1,078
Liked 905 Times in 447 Posts
Default

Quote:
For many years my 642 in a Desantis pocket holster has been my "go to" gun for concealed carry ...
Retired cop opinion. We never let bad guys put their hands in their pockets when we stop them. So do you think a bad guy robbing you, will let you put your hand in your pocket?
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #34  
Old 01-16-2024, 11:38 PM
Yaworski's Avatar
Yaworski Yaworski is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 876
Likes: 202
Liked 1,178 Times in 471 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Rego View Post
I find it ludicrous how so many CCW holders feel the need to gear up with a 17 shot Glock plus two spare mags, a Surefire light, a folding knife, a can of pepper spray and a tourniquet or first aid kit all on their belt before leaving the house.

Oh, and that Glock needs to have an RMR and attached weapon light or laser too. People are watching too much TV.
I get told, "Better to carry 50 rounds and not need them than to need ammo and not have it." What if you need 51 rounds?

I do carry a folding knife, I've carried once since I was a Cub Scout. I use it almost every day and I'm really surprised that everyone doesn't carry a pocket knife.

I'm diabetic so for nearly forty years I've carried what is a small camera case that hold my meter and insulin pen. I use the excess space in the case to carry Tylenol, a few bandaids , and an small flashlight. I don't have a tourniquet.

Spare ammo? I have a Sherpa who carries 500 rounds for my carry gun plus 50 rounds in all of the common calibers against the event that I need to use a pick-up gun.

Last edited by Yaworski; 01-17-2024 at 11:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #35  
Old 01-17-2024, 02:42 AM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,832
Likes: 7,857
Liked 25,761 Times in 8,708 Posts
Default

I carried a J Frame of some sort since 1980 up until 2019 when I got the opportunity to shoot a friends Sig P365. When Sig ironed out all the issues with the then new gun, I bought one. After a few months of testing, shooting and familiarization with it, it became my EDC / CCW and has been on me daily for almost 5 years now.

I now have over 6,000 rounds through it without a hic-cup and it is with me daily. Not only have I not gone back to my J Frame, I don't think I've shot it since. I believe in constant practice with whatever gun & ammo you carry and I got to the point where I was not enjoying practice sessions with my carry ammo anymore. My carry load for the J's were Buffalo Bore 158 grain +P SWCHP and Speer 135 grain +P GDHP.

Shooting the Sig was so much easier, it is more accurate at any distance, allows for greater round capacity (more than double), has better ballistics, is easier and faster to reload, weighs 5 ounces less than the J's and is smaller, flatter and has way way better sights. To me, my 40 year EDC J Frame has now been retired and unless it is an emergency & I doubt I will ever again carry any revolver. To me they have been obsoleted for EDC.

All that said, one must carry what they shoot best, feel comfortable with and can feel confident with. If a J Frame still fills all those needs for the person carrying it, then I guess it is still viable for that person. All I can suggest is never stop practicing with it, do lots of reloading drills and shoot it well.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #36  
Old 01-17-2024, 03:24 AM
shawn mccarver shawn mccarver is offline
SWCA Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 3,523
Liked 6,744 Times in 2,626 Posts
Default

The 642 is still relevant. If capacity is an issue, carry another in your left front pocket!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #37  
Old 01-17-2024, 03:52 AM
Data Data is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 181
Likes: 716
Liked 171 Times in 95 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Vito View Post
For many years my 642 in a Desantis pocket holster has been my "go to" gun for concealed carry. I don't carry while in my home, and it was just so easy to grab the 642 and put it into my front right pocket as I was leaving. But lately I find I am having capacity anxiety, thinking that it is foolish to be limited to 5 rounds of 38+, especially if I honest with myself that my accuracy with this short barreled revolver is pretty much limited to bad breath distances from my attacker. Sometimes instead I carry my Glock 26 with its 10+1 capacity in an OWB holster, but it sure is not as concealable and convenient as the trusty 642. Thoughts?
While I don't condone those who choose to carry firearms with higher capacities, but I think it's most important that you have confidence in your ability to use the firearm you choose to carry. As in your situation, you have a 642 which packs a good punch, but you didn't mention if you carry a spare re-load or two with it. If your 642 carries 5 rounds total, and you add two speed strips at 5 shots ea. then you have a total of 15 rounds at your disposal. Ultimately, if you're adamant about the 642 it's probably best to work on and improve your marksmanship skills overall. I am a firm believer that proficient marksmanship should be your goal, and not so much on higher capacity reliance if I read your post correctly.

Last edited by Data; 01-17-2024 at 03:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #38  
Old 01-17-2024, 04:43 AM
Model 15-4ever Model 15-4ever is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 348
Likes: 491
Liked 658 Times in 184 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Vito View Post
Does the 642 still make sense?
Does the sun rise in the East?
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #39  
Old 01-17-2024, 06:19 AM
mike4sigs mike4sigs is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Northeast indiana
Posts: 411
Likes: 1,212
Liked 341 Times in 143 Posts
Default

I carried my 642 in my pocket for several years and i am still comfortable with except i dont like the trigger. Then i finnally took my 637 to the range and found out i like it better.
i sometimes get caught up in capacity thought but i always figure it out if i cant stop the threat with 5 shots then i probably need to un ***-ing the area.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #40  
Old 01-17-2024, 09:12 AM
Old cop Old cop is offline
US Veteran
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,814
Likes: 4,242
Liked 15,219 Times in 4,166 Posts
Default

I’ve been carrying a light weight J Frame since my 1968 rookie year and was forced into on-duty shootings, reloading in one instance, with an issued thirty-eight so I know it works. My first choice in retirement is a 340PD in a pocket holster w/a speedstrip in an off pocket. If I can’t adequately conceal the J Frame I’ll go with my LCP.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #41  
Old 01-17-2024, 10:17 AM
haywood's Avatar
haywood haywood is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. Ohio
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 9,442
Liked 2,731 Times in 999 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT ROCK 11B View Post
Retired cop opinion. We never let bad guys put their hands in their pockets when we stop them. So do you think a bad guy robbing you, will let you put your hand in your pocket?
If I am walking around I usually have my hand in my pocket holding my 442. Like in parking lots and most places. It’s just natural for me. If we go to a ATM, my wife uses the ATM and I keep head on swivel and watch for anyone approaching. We try to walk to stay somewhat fit. I find I just naturally like my hands in my pockets so I feel I should be able to handle a problem. Sounds good to me but, I’ve never had a problem.
__________________
Two Handguns every day
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #42  
Old 01-17-2024, 10:58 AM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,832
Likes: 7,857
Liked 25,761 Times in 8,708 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by haywood View Post
If I am walking around I usually have my hand in my pocket holding my 442. Like in parking lots and most places. It’s just natural for me. If we go to a ATM, my wife uses the ATM and I keep head on swivel and watch for anyone approaching. We try to walk to stay somewhat fit. I find I just naturally like my hands in my pockets so I feel I should be able to handle a problem. Sounds good to me but, I’ve never had a problem.
One of my favorite expressions I use is, “no one has a problem until they do have a problem”. At that particular point nothing you do in the future will help you at the time of “the problem’. My all time favorite saying and the way I try to live my life is……. Previous Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance”. Hey I sincerely hope you never do have a problem and if you do I also hope 5 rounds are enough.

If a new Airline has operated 100% successfully for 10 years straight without a crash or serious mishap, does that mean they should not update their safety and floatation equipment? Unfortunately, it does seem to eventually happen. I sincerely hope no one here every has to pull their EDC in a SD situation - but the odds are not getting better, - only worse these days.

Last edited by chief38; 01-17-2024 at 11:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #43  
Old 01-17-2024, 11:16 AM
Data Data is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 181
Likes: 716
Liked 171 Times in 95 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Vito View Post
For many years my 642 in a Desantis pocket holster has been my "go to" gun for concealed carry. I don't carry while in my home, and it was just so easy to grab the 642 and put it into my front right pocket as I was leaving. But lately I find I am having capacity anxiety, thinking that it is foolish to be limited to 5 rounds of 38+, especially if I honest with myself that my accuracy with this short barreled revolver is pretty much limited to bad breath distances from my attacker. Sometimes instead I carry my Glock 26 with its 10+1 capacity in an OWB holster, but it sure is not as concealable and convenient as the trusty 642. Thoughts?
It's often said that "more is better". I don't really buy into it. Excluding professionals and their line of work of course. It seems to me that people are placing their faith in higher capacity handguns these days without proper training... the constant narrative that the 5-6 revolver is no longer viable as primary carry, but still useful as a back-up. I disagree with it. Most, if not all civilians don't get into Miami Vice Style Shootouts, unless it involves a gang related shooting for the most part. Watching John Wick, Jason Bourne, Martin Riggs movies have somewhat distorted the reality of self-defense. Do we pretext the idea that we are victims if we don't have enough capacity of ammo to take out 50 bad guys at once? I can understand if they are rabid squirrels (lol), but people, absolutely no. I am not really preaching anything here other than my own unpopular view point. I feel quite safe with a 5 shot revolver, and a spare speed-strip as much as I did when I use to carry a Glock 17 back in the day with a spare mag. I rely on my own intuition, training and marksmanship skills. That is what makes me feel safe and I will stick to it.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #44  
Old 01-17-2024, 11:25 AM
WR Moore WR Moore is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,658
Likes: 1,826
Liked 5,415 Times in 2,732 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury View Post
Mr. Vito, you're covered according to the Rule of Threes:

Three yards, three rounds, three seconds.
.....most gunfights involving civilians and felons takes place at a distance of approximately three to five yards, approximately three and one-half rounds are fired, and no further shooting takes place after approximately three seconds. I believe that this is based on FBI stats but this quote comes from:
The 3/3/3 thing sounds nicely alliterative. However, I've never seen any armed encounter where anyone was standing around with a stopwatch. I'm a decrepit old coot, but if I'm standing there with hands in my pockets (1 on a gun), 3 rounds-with center chest hits- @ 3 yards is under 1.25 seconds.

It's been some time since I spent 5 years digging through the FBI UCRs looking for homicide stats. Frankly, the FBI collects it's stats from the LLEAs that report their stats (no stats, no grant money). I've gotta strongly doubt that they bother collating private citizen shooting stats even if the LLEA bothered to collect them, especially in that detail. A quick skim of the stats readily available online didn't show anything. If you're really curious, you can find the entire UCR on line.

Back then, the UCRs did have a section on LLEA shootings. There was one very sobering section where they mentioned that at 25 yards LE won 90% of the gunfights, they broke even (50%) at 7 yards and lost 90% at 3 yards. Why? The bad person knew there was gonna be a shooting, the cop(s) didn't. At longer range, training won out.

There is a statistically significant civilian shooting data base. You'll find that, plus much more at rangemaster.com in the newsletter section. They show a 3 shot average on 1 aggressor incidents, average range is 5 yards, extremes are 2 and 27 yards.

Last edited by WR Moore; 01-21-2024 at 05:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #45  
Old 01-17-2024, 11:28 AM
kmk008 kmk008 is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Colorado
Posts: 58
Likes: 66
Liked 107 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT ROCK 11B View Post
Retired cop opinion. We never let bad guys put their hands in their pockets when we stop them. So do you think a bad guy robbing you, will let you put your hand in your pocket?
Ok so maybe just to be a little wise here.. when you stopped someone would you have let them quickly sweep their shirt/jacket/etc back while positioning themselves to draw? Probably not..

If you’re being completely reactionary, no holstered gun is going to get the jump on someone. Sure I might be slightly faster out of an OWB holster depending on what’s covering it, but like someone said already, if I feel a risk I can reach into my pocket and be holding my J or BG380 already - it’s much harder to discreetly pull that off with my 4006.

Last edited by kmk008; 01-17-2024 at 11:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #46  
Old 01-17-2024, 11:31 AM
haywood's Avatar
haywood haywood is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. Ohio
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 9,442
Liked 2,731 Times in 999 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chief38 View Post
One of my favorite expressions I use is, “no one has a problem until they do have a problem”. At that particular point nothing you do in the future will help you at the time of “the problem’. My all time favorite saying and the way I try to live my life is……. Previous Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance”. Hey I sincerely hope you never do have a problem and if you do I also hope 5 rounds are enough.

If a new Airline has operated 100% successfully for 10 years straight without a crash or serious mishap, does that mean they should not update their safety and floatation equipment? Unfortunately, it does seem to eventually happen. I sincerely hope no one here every has to pull their EDC in a SD situation - but the odds are not getting better, - only worse these days.
Although I am walking with hand in pocket holding a J-Frame I failed to mention I also have a 9mm Shield in my waistband. I carry Two extra mags for it. So I may Rely on a J frame as my main gun I always have a back up. There was a time when I felt comfortable carrying 2 J frames. But as of the last 2 to 3 years I felt I should carry a little more.
__________________
Two Handguns every day
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #47  
Old 01-17-2024, 11:55 AM
M29since14 M29since14 is offline
SWCA Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,956
Likes: 10,147
Liked 10,131 Times in 4,801 Posts
Default

How risky do you think your usual environment may be? Where I live I’d be fine with a J-frame, but I admit I don’t practice with one like I should, and the sights aren’t ideal for my older vision. Rockquarry is right, IMO. J-frames require constant practice. I’d be better off with a P365 for those two reasons. On the other hand, if I didn’t have/didn’t want/couldn’t afford another gun of that type, I’d still be ok with the Chief. I’d just try to practice more. If I lived in a more hazardous environment, I’d adjust accordingly.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #48  
Old 01-17-2024, 12:32 PM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,832
Likes: 7,857
Liked 25,761 Times in 8,708 Posts
Default

For many years I believed the fact that the average gunfight was over in under 3 rounds. Today's gunfights are a little different! Many times they are from multiple perp's with multiple guns. I no longer feel 5 is enough - without a reload.

There have also been a slew of mass shootings and most of the time the shooter is using some sort of high capacity, high rate of fire weapon. I would not like to get any closer than necessary and just might need more than 5 rounds without reloading. OK, these are worst case scenarios but not out of the realm of reality now days.

I did what I felt necessary and prudent and everyone here must do the same and feel comfortable with what they carry. No definitive right or wrong and only the aftermath would tell. Once again, I HOPE it never comes down to that, but we must be prepared.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #49  
Old 01-17-2024, 12:34 PM
haywood's Avatar
haywood haywood is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. Ohio
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 9,442
Liked 2,731 Times in 999 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M29since14 View Post
How risky do you think your usual environment may be? Where I live I’d be fine with a J-frame, but I admit I don’t practice with one like I should, and the sights aren’t ideal for my older vision. Rockquarry is right, IMO. J-frames require constant practice. I’d be better off with a P365 for those two reasons. On the other hand, if I didn’t have/didn’t want/couldn’t afford another gun of that type, I’d still be ok with the Chief. I’d just try to practice more. If I lived in a more hazardous environment, I’d adjust accordingly.
Where I live in Ohio is relatively uneventful. As far as crime. The most I hear on the police radio is shoplifting at the Myers grocery store. When I’m out and about away from home, I’ll add a second Gun other than the J frame in my pocket. I would say 99% of the time I’m caring two firearms. But on occasion I’ll go with one depending what I’m doing where I’m going. As I mentioned in the winter I’m in Florida. things are a little more wild in the area where I stay so I’m always carrying two guns.
__________________
Two Handguns every day
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #50  
Old 01-17-2024, 12:53 PM
BKLooney's Avatar
BKLooney BKLooney is offline
Member
Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense? Does the 642 still make sense?  
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Upper East TN
Posts: 423
Likes: 2,199
Liked 1,174 Times in 286 Posts
Default

I carry my 642 often, maybe not as much as I used to, when I do it's in a Alabama pocket holster with a strip in one of my other pockets...and a LCP Max somewhere else on me. Nowadays, about 95% of the time I have a LCP Max in a Don Hume pocket holster and my P365 in a kydex appendix carry holster.

The 642 is certainly still a viable option, I just do a better job at hitting what I shoot at with the P365.
__________________
Life Member GOA and NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does this make sense. britbike1 The Lounge 6 08-28-2016 01:14 PM
doesn't make sense erreertt Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 6 12-29-2013 11:26 PM
Does this make sense? tectrry Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 15 07-07-2013 12:03 AM
Does this make sense? S&W Fan S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 5 09-17-2012 08:16 PM
Does this aim make sense?? Mickstix Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 7 08-17-2008 06:26 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:18 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)