The last REAL Winchester '94?

Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
10,358
Reaction score
52,005
Location
Arizona
Flashback to the summer of 1981. I had heard that Winchester was selling its New Haven, Connecticut plant to a new outfit that called itself U.S. Repeating Arms Company, and that in August, all Winchester guns would be made by that new company formed by former Winchester employees.

The plant in New Haven had been turning out Winchester Model 1894s for 87 years, and the last true '94 carbines were now on the dealers' shelves. I was then living in El Paso, Texas, and in those days J.C. Penney sold guns. I ran down there to get one of the very last ones. I paid $150 plus tax for it on Aug. 22, and squirreled it away. I think I shot it just one time - maybe about 10 shots.

I had secured one of the very last guns proudly made by Winchester - the real McCoy. Now I realize that the guns made by USRAC were still stamped "Winchester," but to my mind, the newer ones weren't for real. As I expected, the new outfit changed the old '94s by making them "angle eject" and then, horror of horrors, put crossbolt safeties on them. These were eyesores almost as evil as the internal locks S&W uses today. I tried to fire one of those once, not noticing that the crossbolt was engaged, and the @#$% rifle went "click" instead of "bang." John Browning was rolling over in his grave.

The old '94 has probably taken down more deer in the U.S. than any other rifle made, and it did the job admirably without scopes. It had everything you needed, was lightweight, powerful enough to do the job, and handy. In a pinch, it made a great home defense weapon as well. When you say "thirty-thirty" it's the gun you picture in your mind.

I think I have one of the last of the old breed, maybe in fact THE last, and I thought I'd share a picture of it. It bears serial number 4,969,094. I thought the last two digits were very fitting. Hail and farewell, old '94. We miss ya.

John

WINCHESTER_1894_3.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
I wish I had been astute enough to have done that at the time.
 
I traded into a '94 Winchester in 30-30 and a 1889 Marlin in 32 WCF on the same day. 40 years latter I still have several Marlins, but no Winchesters. I know the 94s work as designed, I just think the Marlin is a better design.
 
1894

i have a '94 made in 1959, do you have problem loading your late model, i always have a problem loading this fully, this rifle has been completely redone, any thoughts, i have read that this is a glitch that has been there always.


oh look 100 posts, that would be 10,500 in old speak.
 
Last edited:
The Winchester Model 94 is my favorite rifle of all time. The specimen I own is from 1974, in .30-30, and is the prettiest rifle I own. The quality of the "post-'64" is lacking in a Win. purist's eyes, but is still a lot nicer than most of what's churned out today.
 
Lovely gun, John! The wood on that thing is beautiful!

I have a similar vintage Marlin, a 1894c in .357 from 1980 which is pure delight to shoot. Neither my gun nor photo are as pretty as yours.

1894c.jpg
 

John,
You're absolutely right. Does yours have the rebound hammer?

The angle eject started in '82 and sucks. And the cross bolt safety starting in '92 was so bad, it helped put them right out of business! They figured it out and dropped the crossbolt in 2002 after 10 years of it, but it was already too late!!

The one improvement they made, unfortuantely after angle eject was started, is the return to the pre '64 floorplate pivot pin with lock screw (instead of the post '64 cross screw) on the bottom front of the floorplate. This eliminated a lot of the 'rattle' of post '64 guns. The 1st thing I did on my post '64s I have from the '70's was to order the long forearm wood of the pre 1950s. It just makes it look like a real '94.
 
I bought this one new when I was about 15 in 1956 or 57. Right after I bought it I had the pad put on for LOP and the williams foolproof. The longest shot I ever made was with it on a deer at about 220 yards, 30 years ago. I have many more "sophisticated" rifles and hadnt been shooting it much for many years. Last year I went and benched it again. I didnt need to move the sights at all and it still was dead on! I still have the rear sight, hood and butt plate stashed.
I am also showing a model 64 that is still in almost new shape. I think that one was made in 1952.

win942359216.jpg


win641882603.jpg
 
Last edited:
In January 1981, my Dad heard Walter Cronkite report that Winchester 94 production would be discontinued in the USA and be moved to Japan. He wanted a USA-made 94, so the next day he went to K-Mart and bought one for $134.00 + tax. S/N says it was manufactured in 1978. He never fired it. It's now mine and it is still unfired. I also have the original box and papers.
Winchester 94.JPG
 
I hope this means the new in box 1894 serial #1 passed down to me is finally worth more than the $23 my great great grandfather paid for it.
 
John,
You're absolutely right. Does yours have the rebound hammer?

No, on this one the hammer is still of the original non-rebounding design. It is, however, powered by a coil spring instead of the leaf spring of the early ones. At least the lifter isn't stamped like the first post-'64s!

John
 
Back
Top