
A little history on this design first. Back in the early 1890s, Winchester asked John Browning if he could design an improved pistol-caliber lever action that could replace the lumbering old Model 1873. Silly question. Browning responded that if he couldn't have a prototype ready in under a month, Winchester could have it for free.
Browning went right to work, and basically scaled down the superb Model 1886 Winchester (his design also). The Model 1886 was known as having an extremely smooth action, but it was big and designed for such heavy hitters as the .45-70.
In only 2 weeks, Browning had a functioning prototype of what was to become the Model 1892 Winchester. Initial calibers were the .32-20, .38-40 and .44-40. These were later followed by the .25-20, and even later, the .218 Bee.
The one millionth rifle was presented to Secretary of War Patrick Hurley on December 13, 1932. Admiral Robert E. Peary carried one on his North Pole trips. Who hasn't seen John Wayne win the West on the silver screen with a '92 equipped with a large loop lever? I understand that the Duke owned several.
Winchester phased out the '92 in 1941, but that only paved the way for clones in more modern calibers to appear, and these are still being made prolifically today. Improved metallurgy has made calibers such as the .44 Magnum possible in this small action. Winchester has re-introduced various iterations of the '92, and these are being made in Japan. A friend of mine was excited to tell me that he'll soon be the proud owner of a takedown Winchester Trapper model in .357 magnum. I understand that the modern Winchesters have tang safeties, a deviation from Browning's original pattern. These aren't cheap, but Miroku has made good stuff for Winchester. Forget that safety, though. The half-cock was good enough for Browning, and it's good enough for me.
I have a Browning '92 in .44 Magnum/.44 Special. Let me tell you that it kicks like a mule. My shoulder still hurts from firing it a year ago. It's a true copy of the original Winchester, albeit with a stupid gold-plated trigger. My sense of esthetics, such as it is, was offended by that. I also have a Rossi "Puma" in .357 Magnum, which I consider the ideal caliber for this little 20-inch-barreled carbine. I found it grossly annoying, however, that Rossi has, in recent years, chosen to tack on a ridiculous "safety thingy" on top of the breechbolt, and the wood they've been using recently is really sad - it looks like dark-stained 2x4 pine wood. The example I have even has a factory repair to the fore-stock, and I bought it new! It's a fun gun, though - 10 shots quick, accurate, light and handy.
Well, at the Phoenix gun show this weekend I got all of my annoyances with Rossi settled, and bought a cherry '92 saddle ring carbine from none other than a grand-nephew of the late great Gene Autry. This Rossi was made pre-"Puma," I'm guessing in the late '70s to early '80s, being as how it was imported by Interarms and from the serial number. It does NOT have the PC safety, and the wood is gorgeous. It's in .357/.38 special - my choice for this gun. A plus is that the cost was quite reasonable.
The recoil is comfortably manageable. It uses modern commonly available cartridges. It holds 10 rounds in the magazine. Power rivals the .30/30 cartridge (which, like the .44 Magnum, kicks like crazy in a '94 Winchester lever action). The '92 has a really smooth action - a dab of lithium grease on the locking lugs is an instant action job. It can serve for small and medium game out to 200 yards if necessary, and can make an acceptable home defense weapon. Now I'm a happy camper, owning a '92 that looks good, mimics ol' John Moses' original design, and didn't cost me an arm and a leg to enjoy.
The Model 1892 is indeed my favorite center-fire lever action; it's "just right" in .357 Magnum chambering.
How about you?
John
Last edited: