Taurus tried to clone the Model 10........

JJFlash

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Messages
42
Reaction score
3
Location
Seaside, Oregon
Picked up 4 new (to me) revolvers today.....

All are Taurus Model 82, 4" heavy barrel, .38 special.

They appear to be police or security turn-ins from either Europe or South America.

All have the lanyard rings.

TONS of holster burn, but great bores and light cylinder turn lines.

Paid $140 each (plus shipping and FFL fees)

SOG and J&G have them, if you're so inclined.

Spooky how close they copied the M10......

Obviously not S&W-level fit and finish, but will make good "glove-box" beaters....

Hopefully I'll get to put a few rounds through them this weekend.
 

Attachments

  • Guns 010.jpg
    Guns 010.jpg
    69.5 KB · Views: 569
  • Guns 015.jpg
    Guns 015.jpg
    93.5 KB · Views: 564
  • Guns 021.jpg
    Guns 021.jpg
    74.4 KB · Views: 497
Register to hide this ad
I expect they will shoot fine and fill the role you have envisioned for them nicely. Makes me feel old though. Seems like not that long ago you would be bragging about buying a batch of police trade in S&Ws for that price.
 
Does one of them (3rd from the top), 3rd picture, have an inscription of some kind on the grip? If so, what does it say?
 
I got this model 65 last year and it works just fine

HPIM0539.jpg
 
They're not S&W, but they're not bad guns. I had one that I bought NIB "back in the day" and I shot the snot out of that gun. Mostly wadcutters, I admit, but that was a good shooting gun. The only complaint I had with it was it had ugly grips. They looked like they'd been carved out a 2x4 by some guy with an ax, but with a T-grip, they worked well enough.

I saw one at a gun show recently and was tempted to buy it for old times sake, but just couldn't justify another 4" 38.
 
I had one ..a Model 82 three incher.

Shot off to the left quite a bit..and the barrel was noticably 'off'...I removed the cylinder and crane..clamped the barrel up in a padded vise..and used a block of wood to tighten the barrel up until it was properly centered. The revolver shot great then.

Compared to a Smith or Ruger...The Taurus was more comparable to the Ruger revolver as far as action smoothness. Seemed a well made gun and was very accurate...I traded it straight up for a FEG Hi-Power clone.
 
I have a few older Taurus's, s', i, whatever. I really like them for the most part although their quality was more hit and miss than S&Ws. I rate them as better than Rugers and maybe even better than some Monday production Smiths. As for the newer ones, no thank you.

From looking at the insides, and outsides, my oldest is a model 86, which is a knockoff of the K-38. It has a hammer mounted firing pin, humpback trigger and will shoot side by side with any S&W I've ever seen.

You did very well.
 
Taurus has the ability to build a very good handgun when it puts its' mind to it, sadly they don't do it as often as they should. I have a 617 seven shot .357 Magnum that has given me very good service, but I will not gamble on a second Taurus product.
 
I think I have 2 Taurus wheel guns somewhere. I wouldn't trust their bottom feeders but their wheel guns do work.
 
I expect they will shoot fine and fill the role you have envisioned for them nicely. Makes me feel old though. Seems like not that long ago you would be bragging about buying a batch of police trade in S&Ws for that price.

actually, I DID buy 4 model 10s for $140 each, along with a K38 CM for $215 from Jers in 2009.....
 
UPDATE with RANGE REPORT!

Took all 4 model 82s to the pit and burnt about 400 rounds.....

Oddly enough, (especially for a revolver so similar to the model 10) they all preferred 125 grain jacketed flat nose over the 158 grain lead.

They shot POA with the 125s, but all shot about 2.5 inches left and 2 inches low with the 158s.

They WERE consistent though, and shot tight groups at 15 yards.

Although they feel a bit loose, none of them spit any lead at me.

The only FTF was a factory reload that didn't have the primer pressed in straight.

All in all, I'm happy with my little beaters!:)
 
Older ones had the firing pin on the hammer, then they moved it to the frame. I'm not sure when Taurus went to cast internal parts but it was probably about the same time.
 
Older ones had the firing pin on the hammer, then they moved it to the frame. I'm not sure when Taurus went to cast internal parts but it was probably about the same time.

Thanks for info. My 65 has the frame mounted pin. I never liked that design in any revolver.
 
A LONG time ago a friend of mine had a 22 caliber target revolver; if memory serves it was a Colt Officer's Model Target, with a frame moutned firing pin. During one firing session the firing pin decided to stick in the forward position. That turns the whole revolver into one immovable hunk of steel. It took us about 1/2 hour to un-jam the thing. The offfset firing pin was out of reach and couldn't be beaten back with a cleaning rod, and I suspect a center fire revolver with a similiar jam would be the same. Don't remember how we finally cleared the thing, but that was over 50 years go and I still remember how immovable everything on that gun was.
 
Parts for older Tauri seem to be non existent. If you decide to buy one make sure you take a look at the firing pin as part of your revolver checkout. (if you can have it in hand before purchase)
Later Colts with FP in the frame should not be dry fired. S&W doesn't seem to care about same. I've had a couple Centennials that would generate sparks when dry fired.
STAMP OUT FIRING PINS IN FRAME SAY I!!!!
 
JcMack,your welcome. And S&W probably doesn't care because they'll sell you areplacement.

Cyrano, I've always had that phobia happening with a duty gun and would never use anything with a frame mounted firing pin on duty.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top