• Update – 12:30 PM EST
    Attachments are now working, and all members can once again upload files.
    We are currently testing URL redirects and other miscellaneous features across the site.
    Thank you for your continued patience and support during this migration.

    Prefer a darker look? You can switch between light and dark modes in your account settings:
    smith-wessonforum.com/account/preferences

The Model 1903 Springfield rifle: An American icon

PALADIN85020

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
10,358
Reaction score
51,869
Location
Arizona
This will be a future article - I thought I'd share some thoughts on one of my favorite U.S. service rifles. Hope you find it interesting.

John

1903_SPRINGFIELD-1280_zps929e5ccb.jpg


The dawn of the 20th Century saw new developments in the field of small arms design. Smokeless powder was revolutionizing the ammunition industry, allowing cleaner firing, less smoke and easier cleaning of the firearm. The turnbolt 1898 Mauser design was accepted as the new de facto standard, and based on that firearm, the United States developed a much stronger and more sophisticated arm than the older Krag-Jorgensen rifle. The Model 1903 “Springfield” rifle served our nation in one form or another for over 50 years. Highly accurate, powerful, rugged, simple to operate, field strip and clean, the Model 1903 easily joins the ranks of classic military rifles.

United States forces first came up against Mauser rifles in the hands of Spanish troops during the Spanish-American War in Cuba. Our men were armed with the old .45-70 “trapdoor” black powder single shots and the recently-adopted Krag-Jorgensen repeaters. The Krag rifles and carbines required that rounds be inserted individually into the flip-down side-mounted magazine. The Mausers, on the other hand, could be more rapidly loaded five at a time by stripper clips. Also, the dual-lug design of the Mauser allowed for a more powerful cartridge. The Krag had only one locking lug, so it couldn’t handle the increased stress of high-velocity rounds. And so the die was cast, and trials began of prototypes of a new rifle based on the Mauser design.

In 1900, a prototype rifle was crafted at Springfield Armory in Springfield, Massachusetts. It had a clip-loaded single-stack magazine which projected below the stock, and a 30-inch barrel. Following tests, an Ordnance Department board recommended certain changes, including a rimless cartridge, a staggered-row magazine contained entirely within the stock, and an improved magazine-cut-off lever. In 1901, an updated prototype incorporating the recommended changes was made. It also featured a rod bayonet. Probably less than 40 of these rifles were virtually hand-made. Most had 30-inch barrels, although some carbines with 22-inch barrels were assembled. Following additional tests, the Ordnance board recommended that the barrel length be standardized at 24 inches (so the same rifle could be used by both infantry and cavalry) and that the rod bayonet be retained. It was to be chambered for a .30 caliber rimless round using round-nose bullets identical to those used in the Krag.

On June 19, 1903, the new rifle was formally adopted as the U.S. Magazine Rifle, caliber .30, Model of 1903. Both Springfield and Rock Island (Illinois) armories were instructed to begin production. Manufacture began at Springfield in November 1903 and at Rock Island in December 1904. Some relatively minor changes were made in rifling twist and cartridge power in order to reduce bore erosion. The rear sight was similar to the 1902 model used on the Krag, with a curved profile. The distinctive front sight had two holes below the blade. A beautiful rust-blued finish was applied. A hinged cap in the butt plate allowed access to a recess in the stock that contained an oiler and a screw-on head for the rod bayonet to allow its use as a cleaning rod. A few over 30,000 of these first rifles were issued. The fit and finish of these initial rifles rivaled commercial sporter rifles.

Obviously, the new arm was based on the Mauser system, and Mauser Werke in Germany claimed seven patent infringements. An agreement between the U.S. and Mauser was made. It called for royalties of 75 cents per rifle, and 50 cents per thousand stripper clips until a total of $200,000 was paid. The final installment on this debt was paid in July 1909. In 1905, at the insistence of combat veteran President Theodore Roosevelt, the rod bayonet was abandoned and almost all existing rifles were retrofitted to accommodate a 16-inch blade bayonet. This was designated as the M1905. President Roosevelt called the flimsy rod bayonet “the poorest invention I ever saw” after personally testing it. Also a new rear sight calibrated to 2,500 yards was fitted. The front sight base was solid, eliminating the two holes. In 1906, the improved .30-06 cartridge was made standard. It had a lighter, pointed spitzer bullet and improved powder that promised less barrel erosion. German claims of patent infringements on this round were made moot with our entry into WWI. All rifles previously chambered for the .30-03 were to be recalled and rechambered or rebarreled and fitted with newer sights calibrated to 2,800 yards. A very few original 1903 and 1905 pattern arms survived this mandatory retrofitting, and are extremely valuable collector’s pieces today.

Springfield rifles below serial number 800,000 and Rock Island rifles below number 285,507 had an earlier heat treatment that resulted in receivers that were sometimes brittle. Therefore ‘03s which are to be shot today are recommended to have serials above those numbers, although many “low-numbered” arms have been shot with no problems. The rifle illustrated for this article is a high-numbered arm, manufactured in September or October of 1918. Although produced during the WWI period, it was made too late to see action in that war. In all probability it was pressed into action during WWII, and then re-barreled, reconditioned and re-parkerized at Springfield Armory soon after the war. Most ‘03s from the WWI era received similar treatment at some point during their lengths of service.

The 1903 Springfield rifle was our standard service rifle during the Punitive Expedition to Mexico in 1916 and throughout WWI (although the Model 1917 “Enfield” was issued in larger numbers). There was a 1903 Mark I rifle designed for the top secret “Pedersen Device” (never used in battle) which could fire .30 caliber pistol-power cartridges semi-automatically. This variation had an oval ejection port in the receiver on the left side. A 1903A1 version with a curved pistol grip appeared during the 1920s. There was a 1903A2, but it was a subcaliber spotting device for artillery training, not a shoulder weapon. Remington made some standard 1903s in the early days of WWII on Rock Island machinery. Following that, they created what collectors call the 1903 (modified), which was produced with some manufacturing shortcuts. A cheaper and faster-to-make 1903A3 rifle was made by Remington and Smith-Corona Typewriter Company during WWII. The ‘03A3 had a receiver-mounted rear peep sight and many stamped parts. The 1903A4 was a WWII scope-mounted sniper version of the 1903A3, and it served honorably as late as the Korean War. Most of these had 2.5x power Weaver 330C (M73B1) scopes. Specially-made Unertl-scoped 1903s were used by the Marines as sniper rifles in WWII and Korea. Although officially replaced by the M1 Garand rifle in 1936, the 1903, 1903A1, 1903A3 and 1903A4 rifles were widely issued during WWII, particularly to the Marines in the early days of the Pacific theater of the war.

The 1903 Springfield was one of the most accurate battle rifles ever made and was employed in combat effectively even through the advent of standard semiautomatic weapons such as the M1 Garand. The “brown shoe” veterans spoke of them lovingly. Today, collectors earnestly seek out examples of most of the variations. Because many surplus ‘03 and ‘03A3 rifles were “sporterized” by civilians in the years following WWII, original pattern service arms have skyrocketed in value over the past few years. The “’03” has become an American icon and holds a solid place in history as a classic military rifle.

(c) 2013 JLM
 
Last edited:
Nice read, John. One little error that I noted was that you say that crossed '03 rifles are still the insignia of the Infantry. That was true once but their insignia was standardized to be crossed 1795 muskets in the 1920s.
 
Nice read, John. One little error that I noted was that you say that crossed '03 rifles are still the insignia of the Infantry. That was true once but their insignia was standardized to be crossed 1795 muskets in the 1920s.

Quite correct - the modern insignia reverted back to the old flintlocks. Thanks for the info; I just omitted that point from the OP. I do have some WWI "crossed rifles" that are definitely '03s.

John
 
I am a new owner of both a 1903 Remington and a 1903A3 Remington. I have no previous experience with either but, I hope to enjoy a long relationship with both.

For those with more than a passing interest in the various '03 pattern rifles I would suggest sourcing "The Springfield 1903 Rifles" book by Lt. Col. William S. Brophy. A great source for everything 1903. The book can be had for $50. - $80.

John, thanks for spreading the 1903 love.

LTC
 
I am a new owner of both a 1903 Remington and a 1903A3 Remington. I have no previous experience with either but, I hope to enjoy a long relationship with both.

For those with more than a passing interest in the various '03 pattern rifles I would suggest sourcing "The Springfield 1903 Rifles" book by Lt. Col. William S. Brophy. A great source for everything 1903. The book can be had for $50. - $80.

John, thanks for spreading the 1903 love.

LTC

A Remington Model 1903(modified) was the first '03 I ever owned. It and many others of the breed are illustrated in one of my photo albums here:

Smith & Wesson Forum - PALADIN85020's Album: U.S. .30 caliber military rifles

John
 
Nice writeup John. I have a few 03's and 03A3's. The only one I never could acquire was the Rock Island 03.
 
A Remington Model 1903(modified) was the first '03 I ever owned. It and many others of the breed are illustrated in one of my photo albums here:

Smith & Wesson Forum - PALADIN85020's Album: U.S. .30 caliber military rifles

John

Interestingly, I have a Remington 1903 (modified) too, but of late there has been significant discussion as to the legitimacy of the "modified" term for transitional 1903’s made by Remington. None other than gun guru Bruce Canfield has changed his opinion and written that the "modified" term is something concocted by collectors through the years and is not an official designation, even though he originally published as much in at least one of his books. Though the official period documents do reflect a transitional period from 1903 production to 1903A3 production at Remington, there is no official term or designation of “1903 (modified)” in the official documentation from either Remington or ordinance personnel. Collectors know that transitional Remington 1903’s are different than the earlier Remington 1903’s, but officially there are only Remington 1903’s and Remington 1903A3’s.


My Remington model 1903 (modified)

179641124.jpg
 
Last edited:
Interestingly, I have a Remington 1903 (modified) too, but of late there has been significant discussion as to the legitimacy of the "modified" term for transitional 1903’s made by Remington. None other than gun guru Bruce Canfield has changed his opinion and written that the "modified" term is something concocted by collectors through the years and is not an official designation, even though he originally published as much in at least one of his books. Though the official period documents do reflect a transitional period from 1903 production to 1903A3 production at Remington, there is no official term or designation of “1903 (modified)” in the official documentation from either Remington or ordinance personnel. Collectors know that transitional Remington 1903’s are different than the earlier Remington 1903’s, but officially there are only Remington 1903’s and Remington 1903A3’s.

Good points. More than probably the '03 (modified) is a collector designation rather than an official ordnance category of the '03, although it's been in general use for decades. You have a very nice example there.

John
 
Interestingly, I have a Remington 1903 (modified) too, but of late there has been significant discussion as to the legitimacy of the "modified" term for transitional 1903’s made by Remington.
My Remington model 1903 (modified)

179641124.jpg

Mine is about 14,000 or so after yours.
 
Well, the one thing I see is the old "one locking lug" fallacy. That has nothing whatsoever to do with the strength of the action; the US Krag has 2 lugs. By the "Rules..." the bolt handle is considered a safety lug. Regarding the mechanism, the Norwegian Krag was chambered for both 6.5x55 and 8x57JR. Both modern, high intensity rounds. And the Danish Krag's 8x58RD is in the same class as the 8x57JR. The US Krag's main challenge was the same as the low number 1903's: unscientific, inaccurate heat treatment.
 
Dang, talk about bringing back memories!!

I finished my last two years of high school in California in the early 50's. Yeah, a long time ago. We had an organization called the California Cadet Corp on campus. We had an armory that had racks of 1903A3's.

We drilled on campus carrying them; we went on bivouac with them in the mountains East of Ontario, CA. There was a 100 yard range in one of the canyons where we could shoot every day!! Great times firing that old rifle.........

Imagine today having an armory on campus, under the bleachers of the football stands?????????/

Oh, we also had a .22 LR Rifle Team on campus.........
 
Dang, talk about bringing back memories!!

I finished my last two years of high school in California in the early 50's. Yeah, a long time ago. We had an organization called the California Cadet Corp on campus. We had an armory that had racks of 1903A3's.

We drilled on campus carrying them; we went on bivouac with them in the mountains East of Ontario, CA. There was a 100 yard range in one of the canyons where we could shoot every day!! Great times firing that old rifle.........

Imagine today having an armory on campus, under the bleachers of the football stands?????????/

Oh, we also had a .22 LR Rifle Team on campus.........

I have similar memories; in the middle '50s our HS ROTC unit had over 100 M1 Garand rifles in the armory under the stadium bleachers. We drilled with them, learned to strip them, and kept them clean and oiled. We also had chromed '03A3s for use by the ROTC drill team. And part of that setup was a 25-yard smallbore rifle range for the rifle team (you could earn a school letter in rifle competition). As an 18-year-old senior I could check out an M1 for range practice on the weekend, and prop it in the corner of my last Friday class to take it home when school let out, and then bring it back on Monday morning. As a side note, in actual competition, I could strip an M1, put it back together and fire a blank in it to prove its functionality faster than any cadet among the 5 high schools in the Phoenix area. I knew that rifle forwards and backwards. I was also the cadet operations officer for the Phoenix Jr. ROTC district, so I learned responsibility there, too.

I don't think the way they do things now is progress. We were taught safety with and respect for firearms and were also taught the necessity to be individually responsible for our actions. We weren't nannied as teenagers, but treated as young adults who could be trusted. We had an open campus without fences or guards, and if over 16 and could afford one, we could drive a car to school and park it there with perfect safety. Every guy I knew probably carried a pocket knife - I know I did; a G.I. knife with a screwdriver, blade, awl, bottle opener and can opener. Seldom did a day go by that I didn't use it. Our lockers had locks on them, and they were never inspected; they were considered almost personal property.

Call me old-fashioned if you will, but things have sadly deteriorated.

John
 
I love the 1903s. I have a orginal SC 1903a3, and just finished putting together a M1904a4 for the CMP Vintage Sniper Matches. All GI parts.

Any 1903 Springfield lover should find a copy of Captain Edward Crossman's "Book of the Springfield" Different then most vintage military rifle books, well worth having in your collection with your Springfield.
 
Well, the one thing I see is the old "one locking lug" fallacy. That has nothing whatsoever to do with the strength of the action; the US Krag has 2 lugs. By the "Rules..." the bolt handle is considered a safety lug. Regarding the mechanism, the Norwegian Krag was chambered for both 6.5x55 and 8x57JR. Both modern, high intensity rounds. And the Danish Krag's 8x58RD is in the same class as the 8x57JR. The US Krag's main challenge was the same as the low number 1903's: unscientific, inaccurate heat treatment.

The Krag's bolt handle was meant as a safety backup in case the single lug cracked; it did not bear on the frame unless the single lug gave way. It also had a long longitudinal lug on the bolt which served the same purpose, so there were three lugs, only one of which actually bore on the frame under normal circumstances. The '03 had two load-bearing lugs and a rear safety lug which did not bear on the frame except in the event of an incredible overload that might crack the two forward lugs. Both rifles were designed with these safeguards, but the '03 had the strongest load-bearing lockup of the two. You are right in that the heat treatment of all of the Krags and the early '03s left something to be desired. The workers at Springfield had to eyeball the heat treatment; usually they were pretty good at it, but I'm sure there were "Monday rifles." The later '03 double heat treatment, and later, the nickel steel receivers and bolts took care of that problem.

John
 
Last edited:
I love the 1903s. I have a orginal SC 1903a3, and just finished putting together a M1904a4 for the CMP Vintage Sniper Matches. All GI parts.

Any 1903 Springfield lover should find a copy of Captain Edward Crossman's "Book of the Springfield" Different then most vintage military rifle books, well worth having in your collection with your Springfield.

It's one of several books on the '03 in my library. I agree; it's a good read, and authored back in the day when the '03 was in flower. Mine shows the original text finished in 1931, and updated by annotation to each chapter in 1952.

John
 
I have 2 A3's and a receiver plus various spare parts. I'm torn between building an A4 clone or simply using the receiver as the basis for a custom rifle. I'm happy I can finally afford the rifles I've always wanted.
 
I bought a Springfield Serial number 725xxx when I was 20. I have fired mostly reloads and M2 Ball in it for almost 50 years. I learned of the low number issue about 10 years ago and I have done some research and I have a copy of Hatcher's Notebook. According to Hatcher, there were few failures and most of those were due to firing ammo that was the wrong caliber(8mm) or high pressure test 30-06.

This is a good article on the low serial number receivers. Information On M1903 Receiver Failures

I have fired enough ammo through mine to trust it and I think that the issues is over blown for normal pressure ammo.

I did notice a dimple next to the serial number which is probably a hardness test. Mine also has the "Hatcher Hole".
 
Last edited:
My wife has a 03 in her military collection. I have shot the 03 several time and I just can't get used to it. Now she also has several 1917's, Remington,Winchester and edystone. These rifles shoot so much better then the 03's, it doesn't seem that the 1917 gets much love.

Very nice read thanks for posting.....
 
Back
Top