|
|
08-13-2017, 06:45 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,470
Likes: 3,071
Liked 4,295 Times in 1,611 Posts
|
|
Kudos to Ruger
So much has been written (here and elsewhere) on Ruger's "black eye" safety recall on their new MK IV rimfire pistols. I won't rehash how it happened. It just did. However, I'd like to give credit where credit is due. In my case, I had two MK IV's that needed to have the frame returned. Once I recieved confirmation of my registered serial numbers, it took about 3 weeks to get the prepaid postage box and (good) instructions on how to proceed.
Since I had already done trigger jobs on both guns ( using Volquartsen parts,) I needed to strip those parts out before sending the frames in or risk loosing them. As an aside, instead of rebuilding the frame assembly with my factory parts, I just sent them all in a zip lock bag. I wasn't trying to be a wise guy, I just figured it saved as both some time/work.
Long story short. I got both frames back yesterday, fully assembled and within 9 days of dropping them in the mail. Both were in as new condition and included a free mag. Additionally, it seems I had mistakenly included a aftermarket mag disconnect cancelling bushing in the parts. Surprisingly, it was gracefully returned .
I'd just like to acknowledge Ruger for their well orchestrated response to a bad situation. I honestly can't imagine it going any smoother or faster.
p.s. I'd also like to recognize/thank Volquartsen in this process. Since the new factory mods to the Ruger MK IV's affected their sear fitment, Volquartsen modified both of their sears, at no charge despite not having any liability in Rugers changed design. This was accomplished with a week and with only a $6 return shipping fee.
Well done!
__________________
Dave
Last edited by Wee Hooker; 08-13-2017 at 06:47 PM.
|
The Following 15 Users Like Post:
|
Ashlander, CDR_Glock, FifthWheel, forindooruseonly, GeoJelly, H Richard, joeintexas, KLYDE, mscook, RTILSON, Shark Bait, smitholdtimer, Spleenless Dave, TX-Dennis, woodsltc |
08-13-2017, 06:50 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,956
Likes: 10,147
Liked 10,132 Times in 4,802 Posts
|
|
Good work on the part of both companies. Thanks for letting us know.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-13-2017, 07:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NOVA
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 5,618
Liked 1,384 Times in 582 Posts
|
|
Good news on getting both of them back! I was concerned that a ten-thumbed person would work on, and scratch, my unfired MK IV. Fortunately, I was wrong (again ... ) and I couldn't find a mark (pun intended) on it after they returned it. I'm sure it cost them a pretty penny but they did it right.
|
08-13-2017, 09:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 72
Likes: 4
Liked 109 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
I recently got my new stainless Mark IV Target lower back from Ruger for the fix. It took just over a week from mailing it out to getting it back, and the free magazine was a nice "sorry for the inconvenience" gift. I've had nothing but good dealings with Ruger.
|
08-13-2017, 10:43 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 6,989
Liked 9,332 Times in 2,759 Posts
|
|
It took well over a month to get my box, but once I did the gun was back in 1 week. Very fast turnaround. They are handling their recall nicely... unlike some companies (SIG).
|
08-13-2017, 10:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Just West of Houston
Posts: 3,468
Likes: 787
Liked 4,674 Times in 2,062 Posts
|
|
Interesting that the volquartsen kit wouldn't work with the safety upgrade. I imagine there will be many surprised to find out their kit will not work when they try to reinstall it after getting the gun back from Ruger.
Did you find this out when you tried reinstalling the kit?
Last edited by gman51; 08-13-2017 at 10:54 PM.
|
08-13-2017, 11:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,470
Likes: 3,071
Liked 4,295 Times in 1,611 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gman51
Interesting that the volquartsen kit wouldn't work with the safety upgrade. I imagine there will be many surprised to find out their kit will not work when they try to reinstall it after getting the gun back from Ruger.
Did you find this out when you tried reinstalling the kit?
|
To be clear, Volquartsen said early on after the recall that "the sear needed to be modified to work properly" . I took the opportunity to send the frames to Ruger and the sears to Volquartsen the same week so I never had the opportunity to tinker/mix. I have no idea what they did to them but they look the same to me. Whatever it was, it was minor.
__________________
Dave
|
08-13-2017, 11:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 72
Likes: 4
Liked 109 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wee Hooker
To be clear, Volquartsen said early on after the recall that "the sear needed to be modified to work properly" . I took the opportunity to send the frames to Ruger and the sears to Volquartsen the same week so I never had the opportunity to tinker/mix. I have no idea what they did to them but they look the same to me. Whatever it was, it was minor.
|
What type of Mark IV's do you have?
|
08-14-2017, 07:31 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 4,470
Likes: 3,071
Liked 4,295 Times in 1,611 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spleenless Dave
What type of Mark IV's do you have?
|
I have been a Ruger MK I/II/III fan for 40+ years. When the new MK IV's came out, I "needed" one for my shooting collection. The first through our shop were the Target models. Although I liked the aesthetics of the stainless Target, the blued model was a full 7 oz lighter (due to it's aluminum frame). The blued one felt "right" and went home with me. A couple of months later we got a batch of Competition and Hunter models in. I was smitten. Since I already had a beauty of a MK II Competition, I opted for a Hunter model. ( Justifying that it filled a void in my collection :-)
FWIW, I believe Ruger really did it right with this new series. Not only is the quick takedown a blessing to most, the loss of the loaded chamber indicator and addition of the mag ejector as well as up sizing it's controls really are worthwhile improvements IMHO. Fit and finish is great too. The ONLY downside I see to the MK IV's is that they no longer come with a Optics base (although still drilled and tapped) and the factory triggers seem to have more creep. Both are easily cured though.
__________________
Dave
Last edited by Wee Hooker; 08-14-2017 at 07:45 AM.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
Kudos to S&W
|
Jagrmaister |
Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols |
2 |
01-15-2014 04:08 PM |
Kudos to S&W
|
tomf52 |
The Lounge |
0 |
07-23-2011 08:17 AM |
Kudos to S&W
|
oldman45 |
Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols |
4 |
12-28-2010 10:49 AM |
Kudos for VM
|
sigp220.45 |
Feedback |
1 |
07-07-2010 07:48 PM |
Kudos to Lee
|
PALADIN85020 |
The Lounge |
10 |
10-10-2009 05:25 PM |
|