Ruger Super Redhawk 44 7.5" w/scope

jigen_daisuke

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
33
Reaction score
38
I've been looking for a companion to my Model 29 and found one in a Ruger SRH in 44 mag. I've been looking to checkout a Ruger and I just said screw it and went for their top of the line model. For all the reviews I've read its built like a tank and really takes the recoil out of most 44s I've shot through it. I took the scope off as soon as I got home as I actually do fine even if I plan on taking this for deer season.
 

Attachments

  • ruger_super_redhawk94.jpg
    ruger_super_redhawk94.jpg
    119.3 KB · Views: 62
Register to hide this ad
Nice rig. Bet its a shooter. Pictured is your guns older cousin, an early Redhawk with an Ultradot sight in factory mounts. Its taken some game. These big, optic sighted Rugers make shooting a .44 mag accurately seem like cheating.
 

Attachments

  • redhawk.jpg
    redhawk.jpg
    225.8 KB · Views: 29
I've been looking for a companion to my Model 29 and found one in a Ruger SRH in 44 mag. I've been looking to checkout a Ruger and I just said screw it and went for their top of the line model. For all the reviews I've read its built like a tank and really takes the recoil out of most 44s I've shot through it. I took the scope off as soon as I got home as I actually do fine even if I plan on taking this for deer season.

I'll be darned! I, too, have a Super Redhawk and I also have a Tasco Pro-Class 3x scope, looks just like yours! I have not yet mounted my scope, but the Super Redhawk is my prime candidate. I can tell you that the Super Redhawk is built like a tank, will take a lifetime of full power 44 Magnum loads, is accurate, and quite comfortable to shoot.
 
*looks around the room nervously*

I had a 7.5" SRH in 44 and foolishly sold it back in 2010...I really wish I hadn't done that. I bought a 629 in early 2018...and...


...I don't like it as well as the SRH. I'll admit that the Ruger has a face that only a mother could love...but I think it's built better and easier to shoot.
 
I have a 7.5-inch barreled Redhawk (not the Super) in .44 Magnum. I believe that the Redhawk and Super Redhawk have slightly different internals.

What I can tell you about the trigger in mine is that it makes me laugh -- like many/most of us active in these forums, the Smith & Wesson double action feel is what I love, need, and must have in my life in a double action revolver. Nothing else is at the same level for me when it comes to the predictable feel of a double action trigger stroke. And with this '85 Redhawk, I must say that Ruger did a fairly decent job with it. It is no S&W of course, it's very "springy" but it is smooth and I can shoot well in double action with it.

Where the laughs come in is with the single action trigger break and feel. It's really quite horrendous! :D The part that, to me, seems as though it would have been easier to get "right" is sooooo wrong.

The single action break has so much creep that you can almost name your favorite waypoints on the journey. I find this to be funny and as one of my past times with this revolver is shooting from a rest at steel hanging 100-300 yards away... I much prefer to take those slow, rested and careful shots in double action, simply because it's a better trigger pull.

It's a good revolver, worth every penny of the $500 I paid for it some 5-6 years ago or more. But a Smith & Wesson revolver it surely is not.
 
I got a Super Redhawk in 1985 and it had a horrible trigger. I spent 20+ hours doing a trigger job that came out almost Smith-like. Friends asked Me to do Theirs and I refused. Too much take apart and put back. I shot the Magnum Handgun matches at the Club til 2004 using 26 gr H110 and Hornaday 240 gr jacketed silhouette bullet. Couldn't even tell it had been fired. Seems like the hotter I loaded it, the better(more accurate) it shot.
 
I think you'll be satisfied.

If anything, the Super Blackhawk is waaay overbuilt for .44 Magnum, being a firearm designed for more powerful cartridges such as .454 Casull and .480 Ruger, but the benefit to that is that the extra weight ought to tame even the absolute hottest of .44 Magnum loads, thus making the sort of .44 Magnum loads you may fire out of the M29 feel like shooting .44 Special target/CAS loads.
 
I chose the SR because I wanted to test out some 240gr JHP loads I've been working with. I'm using 22.5gr of H110 and 23gr of Lil Gun with those loads and with very good results.
 
My only minor complaint is that the hammer is small and I'm used to the S&W oversized hammer. That feels quicker than the small nubby Ruger hammer. I wonder if there's someone who can mod me a wide square S&W style hammer for the SRH?
 
My only minor complaint is that the hammer is small and I'm used to the S&W oversized hammer. That feels quicker than the small nubby Ruger hammer. I wonder if there's someone who can mod me a wide square S&W style hammer for the SRH?

It cannot be done as the entire fire control group is inserted into the bottom of the frame as a unit, the hammer must pass through the slot at the top of the frame.
 
Back
Top