Webley .38 stamped RCMP

revho

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
722
Reaction score
1,092
Location
Beaverdam, MI
This is more of a fact finding mission at this point early on in researching a Webley, that I in all honesty have not seen in person but is said to exist. An acquaintance's father is starting to offload his collection and has a RCMP stamped frame Webley in .38. I see in research that they did use one in .455 but see no mention any where of using a .38 version. Has any one here heard of, owned one, or seen mention of one in research?

Thanks!

Kevin
 
Register to hide this ad
No, and I have a book about RCMP firearms.
However, they did take over and incorporate some local forces and got non-standard guns that way,

With no picture it'd be very hard to authenticate one.


Toronto police def. did have some MK IV Webley .38's.

I think they usually mark guns with a connected MP, not as RCMP. But that may not be correct.
 
Last edited:
No, and I have a book about RCMP firearms.
However, they did take over and incorporate some local forces and got non-standard guns that way,

With no picture it'd be very hard to authenticate one.


Toronto police def. did have some MK IV Webley .38's.

I think they usually mark guns with a connected MP, not as RCMP. But that may not be correct.


Thanks for the quick response. I did see that Toronto Police did use the MK VI as well. I am working on getting more info and pics.

Thanks!
 
Thanks for the quick response. I did see that Toronto Police did use the MK VI as well. I am working on getting more info and pics.

Thanks!

I didn't say that Toronto used the MK VI! That's a military series .455!

The MK IV used was numbered in their commercial .38 series.
NOT the same as the military MK IV .455.

Your best basic bet is to order a copy of, The Handgun, Geoffrey Boothroyd, Crown Publishers, 1970.

If your interest intensifies, look for a less common copy of, The Webley Story, by Wm. Dowell.

But the Boothroyd book will probably answer 97.2% of all Webley questions that you have.
 
Last edited:
Several Eastern Canadian agencies ordered and used 4“ variants of the .38 Mark IV after WW II until the early 1960s.

I have one shipped in 1951 to the Ontario Provincial Police, factory-stamped OPP. As mentioned, Toronto (TPF) and also Montreal police issued these. But I‘ve never come across any mentioned in connection with the RCMP.
 

Attachments

  • AB2654F7-4EAA-4705-85EA-454CA7E67C5E.jpg
    AB2654F7-4EAA-4705-85EA-454CA7E67C5E.jpg
    61.4 KB · Views: 65
  • 42313339-8899-461C-953B-A59632E59D76.jpg
    42313339-8899-461C-953B-A59632E59D76.jpg
    72.8 KB · Views: 78
  • 386475CE-36A0-49A4-8222-D8CAA73CE30E.jpg
    386475CE-36A0-49A4-8222-D8CAA73CE30E.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 71
Here is the one picture I received over the Holidays. I asked for many pictures of the complete gun...and this is all I received. he said there were no other markings or stamps anywhere on the gun. Sorry all, hopefully it makes sense to someone.

Thanks!
 
8e1b8a6c0f58fc2feeced8ecc84af245.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
5ca60ccfe846778aaeb65dbe142962a4.jpg


This is the original sent that would not load earlier, but again. I really am not seeing this as what it is being described as.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I've no idea how much the owner is asking but a few months ago I bought a Mk IV in similar condition for under $200. But I was buying the gun, not the story.
 
5ca60ccfe846778aaeb65dbe142962a4.jpg


This is the original sent that would not load earlier, but again. I really am not seeing this as what it is being described as.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You are dealing with a fraud or with someone VERY ignorant of Webley revolvers.

The photo is prob. a Webley-Kaufman or a Webley-Pryse dating from the 1880's, or a Belgian copy.
 
Indeed. I‘m fairly certain that the crown-over-R is a Liege proof mark.
 
You are dealing with a fraud or with someone VERY ignorant of Webley revolvers.



The photo is prob. a Webley-Kaufman or a Webley-Pryse dating from the 1880's, or a Belgian copy.



I believe it is the latter, a gentleman that see’s a hallmark or proof for what it isn’t and has convinced himself of it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top