Good-bye HK: The (probable) new German Army rifle

The Krauts probably could have saved a boat ton of money just buying kits and lowers from Palmetto State Armory and letting the Bundeswehr boys build them while celebrating Oktoberfest at their favorite hofbrau haus!!

This reminds me of a funny anecdote from my work. I can't go into any detail, but I was assessing a foreign unit we train with and they said something about waiting on their annual ammo delivery. I asked what he meant, and it turned out the ENTIRE MILITARY for that small nation bought its ammo from one gun store in the US, and they hadn't made the purchase for that year yet.

Later it occurred to me that they probly get a much better price on bullets than we do...
 
The fetishism about the "dirty" operation of the DI Stoner design is overblown by a lot. Much of that fetish comes from the historical problems of much older platforms in the US military (1800s), when shooting black powder and other factors contributing to a much different need for cleanliness. That ingrained history also contributes to the socialization of recruits as part of training to become part of the military. That serves its own purpose, but is not a technically valid basis for the cleaning fetish.

However, Pat Rogers, with both military (retired CW2 USMCR) and LE (retired Sgt., NYPD) and a lot of instructor time (he saw who knows how many rounds go downrange from ARs as an instructor, probably well over a million), was critical of the fetish and regularly demonstrated that if that kept wet, a quality AR would work for many thousands of rounds without problems. I don't know how many rounds "Filthy 14" alone had without cleaning, but it was over 40K. I took about 10 different class with Pat, and I saw his teaching about the reality on the range. Quality ARs, using good ammo and magazines and generously lubed simply did not malfunction.

If you have to clean it, it is maybe a 5-8 minutes process. Run a couple of wet patches down the barrel, follow with a dry one; take another couple wet patches and wipe off the BCG and related areas, lube it up, and drive on. It took me a bit longer because I was inefficient.
 
Last edited:
The fetishism about the "dirty" operation of the DI Stoner design is overblown by a lot. Much of that fetish comes from the historical problems of much older platforms in the US military (1800s), when shooting black powder and other factors contributing to a much different need for cleanliness. That ingrained history also contributes to the socialization of recruits as part of training to become part of the military. That serves its own purpose, but is not a technically valid basis for the cleaning fetish.

However, Pat Rogers, with both military (retired CW2 USMCR) and LE (retired Sgt., NYPD) and a lot of instructor time (he saw who knows how many rounds go downrange from ARs as an instructor, probably well over a million), was critical of the fetish and regularly demonstrated that if that kept wet, a quality AR would work for many thousands of rounds without problems. I don't know how many rounds "Filthy 14" alone had without cleaning, but it was over 40K. I took about 10 different class with Pat, and I saw his teaching about the reality on the range. Quality ARs, using good ammo and magazines and generously lubed simply did not malfunction.

If you have to clean it, it is maybe a 5-8 minutes process. Run a couple of wet patches down the barrel, follow with a dry one; take another couple wet patches and wipe off the BCG and related areas, lube it up, and drive on. It took me a bit longer because I was inefficient.

CAVEAT: I have a fired several hundred rounds thru a military M4 in training and I have never had a malfunction of any kind. I am not a SOF guy and have never employed a firearm in anger.

However, I work with SOF guys who saw lots of action in the Middle East. At one point, I was BSing with a SEAL and Green Beret about buying an AR. I said I was planning to get one without a forward assist because it seemed silly. They looked at each other and each of them said they had issues during firefights where the bolt failed to close and they hit the forward assist. These were guns that were used hard and cleaned little during the height of the war, so maybe it was "user error" because they hadn't maintained their weapons. But it appears to be a common issue since two operators who had never deployed together had the same problem.

I like to think that I would have maintained my weapon better, but these guys were very busy and it's easy to imagine that sleep was more important to them than weapon maintenance. I know during my deployments I was worked to the bone and fell into bed most nights.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd love to know what super whizz-bang gadget Haenel are supposed to have ripped off within the design of what is basically a piston AR.:rolleyes:
 
I got rid of my Spanish Cetme G3 because of the charging handle. I hated it. But it was very accurate.
The swedish designed ljungman and Egyptian hakim I like much better. The 8 mm hakim is a beast.
 
[sarcasm]

This new gun shoots bullets? Real bullets? Not rubber bands?? Are you sure this is the same "Germany" that has been run by Angela Merkel for 15 years?? That same "Germany"?? At least the gun isn't all Black like that evil, deadly M-16 -- that would frighten Merkel's newly-arrived constituents, who must be treated with kid gloves.

[/sarcasm]

:D

-------------
 
I read the team that designed Haenal's offering previously designed the HK416.

I guess those guys move around.

Indeed, but what makes the 416 so special compared to the other piston ARs? There is only so much you can do with a short-stroke piston design.
 
So H&K did file a complaint about patent infringement and SECDEF stopped the purchase order.

Sounds like a clusterf*** and SNAFU but whatever. Looks like to me the company with the bigger bank account wins. Wanna bet?

Well, more the opposite. HK is deeply in debt, obligations almost topping assets, and desperately needs the order for the rifle. But they're not owned by foreigners in another part of the world, and have many decades of connections. The military-political-industrial complex works as mysteriously in Germany as it does in the US. So obviously they're pulling out all the stops.

And a lot of people in Germany, including in the Bundeswehr, aren't even convinced that there's anything wrong with the G36 to begin with. Maybe there's even hope they'll abandon the whole project for now; there are other military equipment issues in more urgent need of financial attention.

I read the team that designed Haenal's offering previously designed the HK416.
.

Since the HK416 was the main competitor for the MK556 in this bidding, that may well be the origin of the issue. On this patent stuff, the devil is in the details.
 
Well, more the opposite. HK is deeply in debt, obligations almost topping assets, and desperately needs the order for the rifle.

Yeah, they are hitting quite some rough patches... but what do you expect if you do shady things just to make a few bucks?!

Just another gun company with a management problem!
 
Folks go on and on about how dirty Direct Gas Impingment is, yet the AR-15 is generally known as an extremely reliable rifle.

Personally, I stopped believing in DI and it's supposed filtiness being detrimental towards reliability after watching Tim from Military Arms Channel do multiple videos of himself shooting thousands of rounds through an El Cheapo M-Forgery without cleaning it between videoes, and despite being all caked up inside with carbon, it just kept cranking along until the Ammo Shortage put the series on hold indefinitely. He had some crazy high round count through it too before he had to stop, I think it was right around 15,000 rounds, and it was only just starting to show some signs of sluggish extraction.
 
I try to shoot my various rifles several times a week, at a state range. The max I can shoot out to is about 100 meters, being in SC in the forest. I have iron sights on some, and scopes or Dots on others. Some are Vintage military and others modern rifles, bolt, semi, and 5.56 "AR" style rifles. For me, off a rest, with careful breathing, I am sure I can reliable hit a stationary man sized silhouette out to about 300 yards with any of my rifles, but further than that my sights or dots cover too much of the target to be sure of a hit. I could do better with some of my precision, scoped rifles.

I know our military in the desert has found the 5.56 and its platform inadequate at some of the target ranges encountered in that conflict.

So surely the military in its search for a widely useful individual weapon considers not just the cartridge, but how to ensure a high probability of a hit at distance. Then too, with our military allowing females to engage in combat, how heavy a weapon and its ammunition is matters a lot, not to mention recoil sensitive troops leaning to accurately shoot. What good is a potent cartridge/rifle if the aiming system cannot place the impact.

The are so many considerations in military firearm acquisition, cost, interservice pride, source, and others. But in my case, having been issued an M14 and M16, both iron sighted, if I couldn't see the target, I couldn't hit it. It further than 200 or so meters, for me, it was just suppressive fire. And I fired expert with every weapon the army put in my hands.

SF VET
 
Last edited:
The latest news
...and the winner is (at least for the moment ?): HK

I like HK, they make great guns. But they have reached a position where they have a virtual monopoly over service small arms in Germany's armed and security forces.

The Bundeswehr (military)
Standard service pistol: HK P8 (= USP9)
Special purpose pistol: HK P30
Subgun: HK MP7
Rifle: HK G36, now likely followed by some upgraded HK 416
Squad Automatic Weapon: HK MG4
General Purpose Machine gun: HK MG5 currently replacing Rheinmetall MG3
Flare gun: HK P2 A1
Only in precision rifles is there some brand variety including heavy rifles from Accuracy Int'l and Barrett.

All uniformed federal police agencies: HK P30, HK MP5 and MP7
And 10 out of 16 states issue HK pistols: P10, P2000, P30, SFP.
(The other 6: 5 Walther P99, 1 Glock 46)

As I said, they make good guns. But corporations without serious competition tend to get sloppy, and can become more like bureaucratic government arsenals.
 
I'll take Ljungman/MAS 49 style of direct impingement over Stoner's interpretation any day in a 5.56 weapon.

The Ljungman/MAS 49 system only dumps gas into a recess in the bolt carrier instead of mixing it around the bolt/carrier interfaces like Stoner.

Indeed. While both the Ljungman and the AR are often described as operating by direct gas impingement, that is only partially true, to the extent that neither uses an oprod. The AR bolt and carrier operates on a completely different principle than the Ljungman (and Hakim) design. One could say that the AR basically has a piston inside the carrier/bolt mechanism, but the Ljungman does not. And there is no similarity in the way their bolts lock up to the chamber.
 
Last edited:
My AR-180, also a Stoner design, has a pushrod short-stroke piston design. I guess Stoner figured out that venting gas into the bolt was counterproductive to cleaning and extended functioning.

John


Spot on. I used the AR 180 for a short while during my LEO career. It was accurate and took only a quarter of the time to fully clean after shooting it in comparison to the M16A1, M16A2, and the M4A1 that I used in the military.
 
Back
Top