AMT Lightning

CLASSIC12

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
1,699
Reaction score
11,375
Location
Switzerland
While picking up a pair of 70ies S&W K frame at the LGS (and indulging in a Colt 1911 military retro), I spotted this little guy in a cabinet.

I had never seen or heard of this one. Obviously it's a stainless Ruger Mark II target / bull barrel with a Millett sight, some tweaks and a different brand / markings and I'm a sucker for the (cheap) oddball, as long as it's both stylish and functional. And I got a $100 off, LGS said it's been there a long time

bfec220de3b83d47f65b07f9165d65db.jpg


3eb59a954cd645455945845ec1e3b779.jpg


8d032eb61a74b6485083ec2a7329490f.jpg


5564b6659f231c3f009fea611a60d8e7.jpg


8231f555b88eb3e90263c228e74e5236.jpg


a4bd0e75f49dd8a0bd27f5f0b3fca3c2.jpg


Fitting since I already have a bigger one

26e6a1466ac412733985d46ce8b48863.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
I've never actually seen one of these and don't know if they're good guns or not, but they were advertised for sale by J&G Rifle Ranch in SHOTGUN NEWS for years. That's been about thirty or so years ago, I think.
 
Not sure how AMT got away with copying so closely the Ruger MK II, or if they actually did get away with it.
 
Not sure how AMT got away with copying so closely the Ruger MK II, or if they actually did get away with it.

I'm not sure there is a single element of the design that's covered by a patent, but if there is, a patent is only good for 17 years. And there is no patent on the overall design -- it's just another of many semiauto .22 handguns. Once protection of any patented elements has expired anyone can use the design as long as they don't call the gun a "Ruger Mark II". That's how so many "get away" with making clone 1911's -- as long as they don't call it a "Colt", there's no problem.
 
I'm not sure there is a single element of the design that's covered by a patent, but if there is, a patent is only good for 17 years. And there is no patent on the overall design -- it's just another of many semiauto .22 handguns. Once protection of any patented elements has expired anyone can use the design as long as they don't call the gun a "Ruger Mark II". That's how so many "get away" with making clone 1911's -- as long as they don't call it a "Colt", there's no problem.
Excellent point, I had forgotten how long ago it was that Ruger introduced their 22LR pistol.
 
On another board someone said Ruger filed suit alleging patent infringement, causing AMT's demise, someone else said Harry Sanford's design genius was not matched by business acumen.
 
An issue with AMT guns was function. A good friend bought a new-in-box Lightning. It refused to feed or cycle. He bought Ruger magazines. Same issues. He sold it.

Another friend bought a .45 Hardballer. It had numerous functioning issues.

Please keep us posted once you shoot yours. My feeling was that Harry Sanford was a great designer, but AMT was poor in delivering quality products.
 
I think the downfall of AMT was quality control, specifically, lack thereof. Some of their firearms were really good, but enough of them were poor to give the company a poor reputation.
 
I think the downfall of AMT was quality control, specifically, lack thereof. Some of their firearms were really good, but enough of them were poor to give the company a poor reputation.
I remember a trip to a gun shop, with a buddy, decades ago. The owner was a good friend of my buddy. The owner was all excited about an AMT Hardballer he had just got in because stainless 1911's were not being made by many major manufacturers. My buddy asked him to field strip the pistol. Inside were a bunch of metal shavings and chips. Right there and then, I decided to put AMT on my never buy list. Hope the OP's experience is good with his purchases.
 
How do 1,251 companies get away with making exact clones of 1911s, AR 15s and Single Action Army revolvers? Patents expire. The only things protected are trade names and company logos.
 
Bought my AMT Hardballer in 1978, shot too low with the rear sight at maximum, sent the slide back, got it or a replacement back, fine ever since.
Again, various stories, no one has seen any real documentation or an account by someone in the know.
 
I think in the original story, in Guns & Ammo magazine, by Jeff Cooper, it was stated that Harry Sanford came up with the idea for a .44 mag autoloader, but that he got Max Gera to design and build the first one. So, where does Sanford come in on the "designing" part?
 
Brought the pistol home from the LGS today.

I really like it, seems to be in great condition and a quality weapon, fit and finish are impressive. Quite heavy too for a .22, with the bull barrel, lots of steel in that gun. Can't wait to go try it out.

ffc05f62eab9ef3d634bc333c09769b3.jpg


b6cb80bdba4d16f723b33e0e47859604.jpg


aa1c48d1e2f807ad453f2637d172ed87.jpg


I hadn't noticed the Lightning in the "H"

28e60260379a4a8d6dd88942a000a9de.jpg


f9b8e1bdfd49c4f1fdea0912181333e0.jpg


aaf79d8ca1c6ab8d25ca9f91d0147c3d.jpg


630a715d6eae2b7a688f8547ea8ee25f.jpg


German proof mark 1986 and importer's mark, Engels in Frankfurt

5349327f4949b2964f21f1d6d972dab0.jpg


718fc7cabbdbdc92daa23c52c8fd0594.jpg



954204e602ddf6622d1391bfa58cd46b.jpg


35960287aa0060f57bd9d89e5cca94a3.jpg


4165b5901c6873f81966e34bc76ca596.jpg


Millett rear sight

583ceaa6b139674aeabd1f3217c83f41.jpg


868f3917461d787235e70734627a40fd.jpg
 
I owned two Lightnings back when they were being made and sold. Both were extremely accurate pistols, and one ran like a finely-tuned sewing machine. The other never got off three shots in a row without jamming, even after 2 trips back to the factory and numerous new magazines. Consistent QC definitely an issue.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top