These Are The Breaks...

.357magger

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2006
Messages
1,500
Reaction score
3,171
Location
New Orleans, LA
Top Breaks that is.

(or side breaks too)

Webley, Harrington & Richardson, Merwin Hulbert, Iver Johnson, and...dare I say it...Smith and Wesson too. :)

Before WW2, MANY makers ( and retailers) made and offered top break and side break revolvers until the power and pressure of cartridge development pushed the rounds beyond what the non solid frame systems could safely contain. Lots and lots of Americans carried and owned these early cartridge revolvers as they were sold by the hundreds of thousands.

Do you own any? Let's see them.

I've previously owned a Webley MK VI that was shaved from .455 to use 45acp, and an unaltered Webley MK V. Today I'm down to only one, a delightful 1932 Harrington and Richardson Model 199 Single Action. This trim little 9 shooter is an extremely well made and accurate revolver. One of the most accurate revolvers I've ever shot as a matter of fact.

Show us "the Breaks" you've managed to acquire.
 

Attachments

  • 20200329_164525.jpg
    20200329_164525.jpg
    208.3 KB · Views: 117
  • 20201128_000801.jpg
    20201128_000801.jpg
    76.7 KB · Views: 90
  • 20201128_000726.jpg
    20201128_000726.jpg
    99 KB · Views: 92
  • 20190928_185034.jpg
    20190928_185034.jpg
    133 KB · Views: 86
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I do have a few of the British ones, but here are photos of three early Americans you mentioned, in chronological order:

A .38 Safety Hammerless from 1892, a .38 Iver Johnson from around 1901, and a .32 Safety Hammerless from 1906.

I also have a Hopkins & Allen and a Harrington & Richardson somewhere, but they haven‘t been out for so long that I have no photos handy.


attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • E9F1E2D6-48C6-4D74-8CEC-30D752B83927.jpg
    E9F1E2D6-48C6-4D74-8CEC-30D752B83927.jpg
    70.7 KB · Views: 457
  • CA29B10D-8985-4C7A-A18D-A6069026C859.jpg
    CA29B10D-8985-4C7A-A18D-A6069026C859.jpg
    76.3 KB · Views: 460
  • 25D78F64-16CE-4126-B53B-DB54EB506801.jpg
    25D78F64-16CE-4126-B53B-DB54EB506801.jpg
    97.6 KB · Views: 460
And here are the British:

A military-contract .455 Webley Mk III from 1899 (unfortunately shaved), an Enfield No 2 Mk I** from 1943, a WAR FINISH .38 Webley Mk IV from 1941, and a Canadian police .38 Webley Mk IV from 1951.


attachment.php


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 01C2509E-72EE-400C-886E-416AC04105D8.jpg
    01C2509E-72EE-400C-886E-416AC04105D8.jpg
    112.5 KB · Views: 447
  • DD16B0DE-ACFF-4149-9B80-7FF4C84FDD1D.jpg
    DD16B0DE-ACFF-4149-9B80-7FF4C84FDD1D.jpg
    80.5 KB · Views: 448
And here are the British:

A military-contract .455 Webley Mk III from 1899 (unfortunately shaved), an Enfield No 2 Mk I** from 1943, a WAR FINISH .38 Webley Mk IV from 1941, and a Canadian police .38 Webley Mk IV from 1951.


attachment.php


attachment.php

That Webley Mk III is pretty nice, shaved or not.
 
I remember when we called these top breaks " Saturday Night Specials" you could buy them all day for $25. Boy, how times have changed. I will say most, most of the true SNS's we're in 22, 32 S&W and 38 S&W. S&W branded pistols didn't qualify as they and Colts always had a collectors interest. Webley's we're always a collectible brand due I think due to rarity in the US.

Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk
 
I got on a .38S&W kick a while back and picked up a couple of top breaks in that caliber. Fun to shoot, the H&R Defender was a WWII issue to security at defense plants, there 925 was a carry size (?), and the S&W Perfected was the firearms equivalent to wearing a belt and suspenders (it has both a regular HE cylinder release and a top break latch). Here's some pics.
 

Attachments

  • 0908192031.jpg
    0908192031.jpg
    72.9 KB · Views: 51
  • output[1].jpg
    output[1].jpg
    110.4 KB · Views: 49
  • 8668950_02_h_r_defender_38_s_w_top_break_640[1].jpg
    8668950_02_h_r_defender_38_s_w_top_break_640[1].jpg
    84.5 KB · Views: 38
I have these two.

A Webley MkII (1894~1898) that was shaved for .45ACP and moon clips. I have fired it with lightly loaded ammo a friend cooked up years ago, but it's been at least 15 years. Need to fix that.

EhqFRA5h.jpg


P47Y3Ovh.jpg



The Enfield Mk2 No1 is a 1944 piece. If I can get some ammo for it, I would like to give it a whirl.

P72v0Mjh.jpg
 
Last edited:
...
The Enfield Mk2 No1 is an Australian stamped 1944 piece. If I can get some ammo for it, I would like to give it a whirl.

P72v0Mjh.jpg

Where is the Australian stamp? It appears to have British post-war commercial proofs on the barrel.

You are probably aware that the large broad arrow on top makes the Mk II a Royal Navy issue. These are fairly desirable.
 
Good catch. I had 3 of the Mk2's at one point and traded a couple away. I know one was clearly D broad arrow marked. I had to go out to the safe and check. It's been a while. This is not that one. It is marked 44. It doesn't have the large Enfield and crown stamp, but the D over E stamp is all over it,.

I've heard different things about the Royal Navy markings. This MkII is not stamped N anywhere.
 
Last edited:
I've heard different things about the Royal Navy markings. This MkII is not stamped N anywhere.

Interesting. I have not encountered a Mk II with the large broad arrow but without the corresponding N and number on the upper backstrap. Your top photo cuts that off; is there anything stamped on the backstrap?

My Army Contract Mk III has lots of little arrows on various parts, and a service date and unit marking on the backstrap, but nothing on top.


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 183BB109-5C4C-4BCF-AD92-34750CE0A7A2.jpg
    183BB109-5C4C-4BCF-AD92-34750CE0A7A2.jpg
    50.6 KB · Views: 266
I have 10 top break revolvers. Since most were Nickle Finish, I refer to them as my Pimp Gun Collection!

I have seen 6" barreled H&R Target 22 that shot as well as my Model 17 and better than my 34!

But I love my Uberti production Number 3 Russians! Care enough to give the very best, shoot it with a 44!

Ivan
 
American made top break have eluded me so far.:(

But I do have 3 British ones.:D

A .455 Webley Mark VI from 1915(it's a first year production gun).
attachment.php


A .38/200 Webley Mark IV from 1941(early war finish) and an .38/200 Enfield No 2 from 1934 marked R.A.F.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 20210124_225005.jpg
    20210124_225005.jpg
    70.1 KB · Views: 231
  • 20200704_152035.jpg
    20200704_152035.jpg
    89.9 KB · Views: 232
I'd love to pick up a VI as a shooter eventually.

I am curious about the AM2 markings on my Enfield. Have never been able to get that unraveled
M3iGajsh.jpg


The Webley MkII DOES appear to be a Royal Navy gun. Very faint N on the back strap I got to show up with a china marker. Not much else there. Just the faint N and the 8.
TRBtbygh.jpg


There is a 2nd N on the left side, but I don't know if it's part of that group of markings.
DetazYNh.jpg


I do love how even the screws and springs are broad arrow marked. :)
dz0c8doh.jpg
 
Last edited:
I only have the one. It's an H&R 926 picked up mucho el cheapo. I had some unfinished/uncheckered factory grips on hand that I could reshape and finish to my liking. It's a fine shooter/fun plinker. It does have some finish issues and a little pitting. It's sort of like an ugly but lovable "rescue dog".
 

Attachments

  • 100_3650 (2).jpg
    100_3650 (2).jpg
    88.7 KB · Views: 18
  • 100_3651.jpg
    100_3651.jpg
    110 KB · Views: 11
  • 100_3652.jpg
    100_3652.jpg
    73.8 KB · Views: 11
  • 100_3653.jpg
    100_3653.jpg
    93.7 KB · Views: 10
  • 100_3654.jpg
    100_3654.jpg
    97.6 KB · Views: 7
....
I am curious about the AM2 markings on my Enfield. Have never been able to get that unraveled
......

The Webley MkII DOES appear to be a Royal Navy gun. Very faint N on the back strap I got to show up with a china marker. Not much else there. Just the faint N and the 8.
.....

There is a 2nd N on the left side, but I don't know if it's part of that group of markings.
......

I do love how even the screws and springs are broad arrow marked. :)

I believe the letter/number stamping on the Enfield cylinder denotes the lot number of the steel.

The N on the backstrap nails it. I don’t have one of those, so I haven’t looked into that group of symbols on the frame, but I’ve noticed it on other Navy guns.

Yep, arrows everywhere!


attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 3C22A073-701D-478D-BA3A-6962202C768D.jpg
    3C22A073-701D-478D-BA3A-6962202C768D.jpg
    53.1 KB · Views: 92
Back
Top