I recently picked up a new 5.5" Ruger Redhawk 8-shot 357 Magnum. I'm thrilled that Ruger still makes a configuration of the Redhawk like this, and though I generally prefer my cylinders with flutes I have to say that the unfluted one looks pretty sharp here. This might be one of the prettiest DA wheelguns that Ruger still presently manufacturers, or perhaps I'm just a sucker for a partial underlug and 5-ish inch barrel.





That aside, I've noticed that Redhawk grips are unique to the gun (and frame shape) and there don't seem to be too many manufacturers out there for them. I don't care for how thin the stock Altamont laminate grips are. Does anyone have any recommendations aside from Hogue? (Not that I have a problem with Hogue's excellent wood grips - just weighing my options.)

__________________
AKA SixToEight

I went through the same thing. I just Googled "Ruger Redhawk square butt grips". There were a lot that came up. I think Badger was one, Eagle Grips was another. Ended up staying with the factory grips and a BK grip adapter. Works well for me. After looking at all the sites I found, if I were to change grips in the future, I would go with Hogue. Had a set on a Super Redhawk and they were comfortable to shoot and fit my hand well.

__________________
Have Canon, Will Travel

Thanks for the input. I do like the look of Eagle's Target stocks, but Hogue's variety is always appreciated too. Will a K-frame BK/Robertson/grip adapter fit the Redhawk alright?

__________________
AKA SixToEight

Looks like you have not fired it yet?
You will quickly realize that you really don't need any recoil reduction type of grips due to the hefty weight.
I am a sucker for the Pachmayr rubbers since I have several Redhawks that see regular use. I prefer the backstrap cushion on the 44's and the soft rubber when packing/tossing multiple handguns into a tool bag. Between the leather holsters and rubber grips, it keeps them from clanking around. I use both the old presentation style and the newer soft style with finger grooves. Only problem with the finger grooves is the terrible fit. All of the reviews will tell the fit story. I ordered 3 and kept 1 that was the only somewhat decent fit, then sent the other 2 back.
Whatever you go with, get out there and have some fun and blacken that tool up. I have both 5.5" and 7.5" in the old original Redhawk 357. You can run the stoutest loads you want to with these, and they still feel like you are shooting a 38.

__________________
"Tastes just like chicken"

Having tried several wooden grips on my .44 Redhawk, I went with the Hogue Bantam grip, and never looked back! Not pretty as wood, but they work well with .44 Spl & Mag. Rnds (no trigger guard bite!)

Attached Images

20220204_175920.jpg (148.5 KB, 37 views)

Love the thick Pachmayr grips on my Redhawk in 44 Mag. Mind you, with my bony hands and skinny wrists, I need all the cush I can get.

__________________
Release the Kraken

Here's mine with checkered Hogue's!

Attached Images

Ruger Redhawk 44 mag.jpg (91.7 KB, 22 views)

When you have a K/L-frame sized hand, the RH can be a bit of a challenge.
For me, Hogue or Pachmayr rubber just seems to be too big. Good luck in the hunt.

Nice find, NY-1. I always thought the Redhawk the perfect size magnum hunting revolver. Never got the ugly and bulky "Super" version.

I have put many thousand heavy .44 mag rounds thru my early gun without issue. I have big hands, and like the feel of the Pachmayr grips shown.

Larry

Attached Images

rugerredhawk.jpg (94.5 KB, 67 views)

Don't know about Robertson's, but the N frame BK works well on mine. Not a perfect fit, but very functional, plus they are a great company to deal with!

__________________
Have Canon, Will Travel

You're correct - I haven't gotten out to the range with it as of yet. As far as still-available closed backstrap rubber grips go, I definitely prefer Pachmayrs. It seems like any new production Pachmayrs made after Lyman bought them out and moved production to Mexico in the late 90s have generally lousy fit and finish, whereas the earlier vintage ones are much better and line up perfectly. Thanks for the input. I may very well end up with Pachmayrs on it after a few 8-round cylinders of 357.

I agree - between Hogue rubber grips and Pachmayrs I tend to prefer Pachmayrs. I like the squishier feeling and the checkering with medallions. Though the vintage Pachs fit much better than the new production Lyman stuff. I generally go for rubber grips on stainless guns, but this Redhawk is so pretty that it deserves wood. I might change my tune after a few magnums, but I imagine the weight of the gun will mitigate any significant discomfort. Time will tell.

If only Hogue offered wood grips in this shape for the square-butt Redhawk. I never cared for Hogue rubber grips's pebble stippling pattern, but the shae of the Bantam grip looks comfy as can be.

Those look great - thanks for sharing the photo.

That is a concern. I have medium sized hands that tend to fit the K/L frame profile well enough. Thanks - I'll keep this thread posted once I find something.

That's an awesome setup - thanks for the photo! I've been very impressed with the looks and feel of the Redhawk, and you're right - the Super Redhawk looks oddly bloated by comparison. Pachmayrs certainly soak up that recoil, and that's quite an impressive round count! I do like your matching stainless/silver optic there too.

Thanks. I have an extra K-frame BK adapter lying around, along with a Robertson adapter. I wish the BKs could be had in silver, but I think I'm going to try the Robertson adapter with the stock Altamonts to see how it fits. If the fit is good, I've also learned that Chigs Grips offers Redhawk grips now and I might give them a shot.

__________________
AKA SixToEight

There’s several aftermarket grips available for those.
I prefer just adding a Tyler T to mine.

Attached Images

IMG_0083.jpeg (63.0 KB, 4 views)

I have these on my 44 mag. Very comfortable, especially with full house loads!.