IHMSA Revolvers, anyone?

Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
2,407
Reaction score
5,983
Location
Upstate, SC
So, a few days ago, someone asked about a 686 Silhouette revolver at their LGS.

8 3/8" 686 buy or leave?

That got the talk rolling on a number of related things. One of them was, the impact of IHMSA (metallic silhouette shooting) on revolver performance and accuracy.

I wrote this:
I’d like to give a “Shout Out” to Smith & Wesson, or at least the company as it was when the revolvers in question were first built, ie: 1980s.
The IHMSA Silhouette game was conceived as a test of long range marksmanship emphasizing skill over equipment. The course of fire is 10 shots at each of the following distances: 50 meters, 100 meters, 150 meters, and 200 meters. Targets are metal animal shaped silhouettes. Targets had to be toppled to count as a hit. (Think about those distances next time you’re at the range and see some guy emptying mag after mag, spraying all over the giant “bad guy” target 10 feet away!)
IHMSA established strict rules to keep the match from becoming an equipment race, where shooters could “buy points”. Besides the “Unlimited” classification, single shot, revolver, and standing were shot with “out of the box” guns. No modifications were permitted besides a change of grips and a little trigger work. No optics were permitted, only iron sights! There were weight and dimensional restrictions. There was also a price ceiling: production guns could not be priced over $600 MSRP!
Gun makers like Ruger, S&W, Thompson/Center and Dan Wesson were at the forefront, collaborating with IHMSA staff, match organizers, and competitors to improve their products. Tolerances, quality control, and careful assembly were paramount. Gimmicks don’t help win matches! Technical innovations had to be carefully done to conform to the rules and stay within the price ceiling. S&W’s four position front sight was a brilliant example, as it could be adjusted and set for specific loads at each of the four distances,
Ultimately, this all made for an era of better, more accurate guns.

Today, many shooters pass over these great guns, unaware of their intended purpose or the performance of which they are capable.
Who knows, maybe one day they will shine again
!”

Anyhow, it got me thinking about other great IHMSA revolvers.

Here’s Ruger’s excellent IHMSA Member Edition Super Blackhawk in 44 Magnum. It started as a “members only” limited edition of 500 revolvers that came out in 1979. Bill Ruger was committed to building a better gun for the game and was the first major maker to do so. It has a tuned action and a 10.5” barrel made by Douglas. It also featured a special benchrest style countersunk muzzle crown for added accuracy.
Most examples of this revolver are capable of shooting 6” five shot groups at 200 Meters (the distance to the IHMSA “Ram” target).
Aesthetically, the polishing and bluing is some of the nicer work Ruger has done.

Anybody else have any cool IHMSA revolvers? Maybe a Dan Wesson, or a Seville?
(I know there’s a few 10” S&W 29s with the four position front sight owned by forum members! :cool:)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1413.jpg
    IMG_1413.jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 45
  • IMG_1414.jpg
    IMG_1414.jpg
    61.9 KB · Views: 39
  • IMG_1420.jpg
    IMG_1420.jpg
    61.9 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG_1422.jpg
    IMG_1422.jpg
    134.3 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG_1423.jpg
    IMG_1423.jpg
    122 KB · Views: 26
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I have two of the T/C Contender actions with about 10 barrels. A Super 14' in 44 Mag another in 7 TCU and my favorite a 12" Hunter in 375 Winchester.. Now days I just plink a groundhogs wit 10" Bull barrels in 22 Hornet and 221 Fireball (Both Scoped). Several years ago, I was in a "Fun" shoot-off with my 10" Hornet, and a buddy had his 14" Hornet. I ended up winning with 10 hits on fist sized rocks at 275 yards, to his 8 hits.

Several people had good results with Super 14's in 223 Remington, I had a very early one that was terrible. My B-I-L has an Iron Sighted 10" Octagon in 222 Rem that he says "Is the most accurate firearm I have ever owned!" I have two 10" Octagon barrels with Iron Sights (357 Mag & 221 Fireball), I just don't have the eyes to go with them, but they used to do just fine!

I never had the reflexes to shoot skeet with the choked 410 model, but My F-I-L did real good, clear into his mid 70's. In his late 50's, he pulled a bunch of muscles using a scoped 10" Bull in 30-30. (stiff arm and factory 170's)

Ivan
 
I started out IHMSA with the first gun that I ever bought by myself (as soon as I turned 21), a Model 15 Dan Wesson .357 with an 8" barrel with standard shroud. I then transitioned to a Ruger Super Blackhawk .44 Magnum with 10" barrel, with a ramp front sight rather than the Patridge that later became standard. When the 10" Ruger SRM in .357 Maximum came out I went to that, shooting Hornady 180 gr .358 spire point bullets using .357 cases. I also used a Dan Wesson .44 Magnum with an 8" barrel.

Even though I stopped shooting IHMSA around 1986 when I started traveling frequently for work, I still have all those guns.
 
Last edited:
Sold them custom xp 100 350 Win, Wichitah 7mm, Ruger 44. Competed some 40 years ago shot quite a bit with JD Jones he was one hell of a coach
 
Wow, you guys really did it right!
I was in Canada during the “IHMSA 80s”. So, I missed out on hanging with some of those characters like JD Jones, Elgin Gates, etc.
Weather there kept the game from year round access. But, fresh snow is very good for highlighting the targets if it’s not too sunny.

I shot my first IHMSA matches using T/C Contenders, in heavy hitting 357 Herrett and 30-30. The recoil was brutal, even though I was using cast bullets at less than full power loads.
My brother was using a S&W 25-5 45 Colt with standard loads and 250 gr cast SWCs.
When I saw how effective the 45 Colt worked, and with a lot less recoil, I thought, “Hey, wait a minute! That’s not supposed to happen!”
Next time, I used my model 29. I tried 240-250 gr. cast bullets from the Lyman 429421 and RCBS 44-240 Sil molds, downloaded with 8.7 gr. Unique.
That was a lot more fun, especially once I got the sight settings worked out!
 
Last edited:
I have a 686 and a 29 Silhouette . I enjoy the 29 more , I shoot it on our 200yd range . A couple of weeks ago we went digging through some cones containers on the property and lo & behold we found some of the metal silhouettes . But what I really enjoy is shooting at shotgun clays at the 100yd range . You can tell when you hit one of them with a 44mag ! It's sad that it seems like silhouette shooting when by the wayside here , and after I bought my silhouettes . But I still enjoy shooting them . I really like the Ruger you posted 6String , I wouldn't mind finding one of those .
 
I have a 686 and a 29 Silhouette . I enjoy the 29 more , I shoot it on our 200yd range . A couple of weeks ago we went digging through some cones containers on the property and lo & behold we found some of the metal silhouettes . But what I really enjoy is shooting at shotgun clays at the 100yd range . You can tell when you hit one of them with a 44mag ! It's sad that it seems like silhouette shooting when by the wayside here , and after I bought my silhouettes . But I still enjoy shooting them . I really like the Ruger you posted 6String , I wouldn't mind finding one of those .


Those full size targets were expensive! Glad you found some!

There’s still a few silhouette ranges around. A few years ago, I was visiting Death Valley, CA. While venturing out in search of the nearest town, I drove right past a very nice IHMSA club! It looked like a dedicated facility just for IHMSA!

When Ruger offered their IHMSA Super Blackhawk, members had the option to order a French fitted mahogany presentation case. I think that added $150 to the price.
Sometimes, you can find unfired examples of that gun, complete with the optional case!
 
Last edited:
XP100R in 6mmBR, but traded it a couple of weeks ago.


Edit...Don't know what the heck happened, but I had a lengthy post, but when I hit the send command everything disappeared but the above part of the last sentence...is there a 'Forum problem'?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top