Mark III (NCStar) Scopes

No its perfect, just not talented enough to hold gun on target and operate camara at the same time lol
 
Just got my Ncstar Mark III 3-9x42 today and guess what, I have the same problem as 919 did the cross hairs are out of level. I put the scope on a level surface then looked down the scope and noticed that the cross hairs where not level. Don't know what I should do now hopefully the eBay member will give me a full refund back, because in order to get it fixed or a new one back you have to pay for shipping to ship it to Ncstar and give them $10.00 for them to ship it back to you after it's either fixed or they send you a new one if it can't be fixed. I'm pissed.
 
I can't really be to mad about it though because I've read some reviews about the same problem I have, but was hoping that mine wouldn't be like that. It looks like it would be an awesome scope if the cross hairs where level. Don't really know if I want to buy another Ncstar though. Are their any other scope out their that have a quick release lever and the same design as the Ncstar?
 
I just bought a NStar holo sight with 4 reticles . I was pleasantly surprised at both quality and performance. I will probably buy another for my Sig 522, too.
 
You can buy the NcStar quick release picatinny rail, and put on any scope you want. I put a 50MM on mine and it fits fine. The scope outperforms the .22 but thats ok.
 

Attachments

  • 15-22 with 3-9x50 scope 008.jpg
    15-22 with 3-9x50 scope 008.jpg
    48.9 KB · Views: 869
Went to the local gun show today looking for sights/scopes.

The NC Star 1.25-4x 30 mm looked really nice. At 1.25x, it's close enough to use 2 eye aiming with quite a bit of eye relief. Was still bright at 4x. The reticles illuminate REALLY bright, especially when green.

I'm assuming this mounts the same as everyone who has the 3x-9x version. Is the height OK? Any issues?

Anyone know of other scopes in this price range and zoom ranges from 1.0/1.25 - 3x or 4x?
 
Last edited:
"The NC Star 1.25-4x 30 mm looked really nice. At 1.25x, it's close enough to use 2 eye aiming with quite a bit of eye relief. Was still bright at 4x. The reticles illuminate REALLY bright, especially when green.

I'm assuming this mounts the same as everyone who has the 3x-9x version. Is the height OK? Any issues?"

I've attached a pix of my 1.25-4X NCS scope mounted on my 15-22. The height is OK for me, and I don't see the need for adding an extra riser at all. (Your mileage may vary...)

So far, it's working really well for me, and I do like the low-power option of having both eyes open and great visibility. Plus, the higher-power option in case I ever take this out for small game. I have yet to sight-in the other top-turret settings though (is now just sighted-in on "1" at 50 feet for our indoor range, but I really need to get back out and see where "2" thru "5" hit, as I believe the scope is calibrated for .223 ammo with a 100-yard zero).

Some other users (Amazon reviews) have reported "slanted reticle problems", but others have also cured that by pressing down HARD on that side of the rail when you tighten it up. I did that, and dare I say my Sniper reticle is close to perfect.

Oh... and I really do like how my limited-edition 10-round mag looks on this piece too. (Search on my prior posts, if you missed the details on how to make those!)

Tight groups all!

Old No7
 

Attachments

  • M&P with 10-rnd Mag (Medium).jpg
    M&P with 10-rnd Mag (Medium).jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 361
Some other users (Amazon reviews) have reported "slanted reticle problems", but others have also cured that by pressing down HARD on that side of the rail when you tighten it up. I did that, and dare I say my Sniper reticle is close to perfect.

Oh... and I really do like how my limited-edition 10-round mag looks on this piece too. (Search on my prior posts, if you missed the details on how to make those!)

Tight groups all!

Old No7

I had the slanted reticle problem with my 3-9x42 and could not do anything to get them level. So I called up NCstar and shipped it to them and now their are sending me a brand new replacement that should be here this week. NCstar has great customer service.

I'm still wanting to do your 10 round mag mod also, just haven't had the time to do it.
 
I've attached a pix of my 1.25-4X NCS scope mounted on my 15-22. The height is OK for me, and I don't see the need for adding an extra riser at all. (Your mileage may vary...)

So far, it's working really well for me, and I do like the low-power option of having both eyes open and great visibility. Plus, the higher-power option in case I ever take this out for small game. I have yet to sight-in the other top-turret settings though (is now just sighted-in on "1" at 50 feet for our indoor range, but I really need to get back out and see where "2" thru "5" hit, as I believe the scope is calibrated for .223 ammo with a 100-yard zero).

1. Which reticle did you get (I'm thinking MIL-DOT)

2. Do you have any issues with the illumination being TOO bright (ie - you can't see the target)?

3. Did you look at other brands/models?
 
Im just gonna mention this as some may not know.
But you can buy much higher quality optics for not much more money threw Nikon. Granted its no ACOG or Military style scope, Its quality and accuracy are hard to beat for the money.
I paid $180 for 3-9x40 Buckmasters and the Prostaff's are in the low $100's range.

I understand looks and symmetry and style/theme people want for their gun. I just want to point out for similar too a tad more money you can have very good quality optics.

Just to show im not an elitist ive owned 2 basic $30 Tasco red dots both which worked perfectly for what i needed.
 
I actually think Tasco has a pretty proven track record and have for many decades. They were the original "cheap, good scope". This whole thread kind of scares me because I want to go with the MarkIII but if it's going to come with a crooked reticule I'm not sure it's worth my time.. And it's not exactly cheap I am looking at the MarkIII 3-9x42 with the MDAB RDS on top and it's a good $200.00
 
I actually think Tasco has a pretty proven track record and have for many decades. They were the original "cheap, good scope". This whole thread kind of scares me because I want to go with the MarkIII but if it's going to come with a crooked reticule I'm not sure it's worth my time.. And it's not exactly cheap I am looking at the MarkIII 3-9x42 with the MDAB RDS on top and it's a good $200.00

I've got two Tasco PPD2 and have terrorized them for over a decade with many tens of thousands rounds of 45ACP, 9mm and .223. They cost around a $hundred+ back then and still work perfectly. As far as being able to handle typical civilian range abuse, the old PPD2 takes a second seat to no other red dot optic as far as I'm concerned.
 
I actually think Tasco has a pretty proven track record and have for many decades. They were the original "cheap, good scope". This whole thread kind of scares me because I want to go with the MarkIII but if it's going to come with a crooked reticule I'm not sure it's worth my time.. And it's not exactly cheap I am looking at the MarkIII 3-9x42 with the MDAB RDS on top and it's a good $200.00

169.00 shipped at RRages ;) this is the first time ive heard of people having problems out of them. ive been looking into them for a while, even asked some members on here about em. kind of scares me too
 
Guys my price I listed was high but that was a 'round figure" I am looking at the model with the MDAB Red Dot on the back/top of the scope.
 
Anyone know of other scopes in this price range and zoom ranges from 1.0/1.25 - 3x or 4x?

Primary Arms 1-4X 24 Illuminated Scope
$120 (poormans burris)

Primary Arms 1-4X 24 Illuminated Scope

Most of the reviews I have seen on the Primary arms are good. Like I said I went with a 2-7 Vortex and have been very happy but it might not meet your needs.
 
Last edited:
Anything that says Vortex on it is WAAAAY out of my price range
 
Back
Top