Very happy with M&P R8

Storm

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
85
Reaction score
8
Location
North of Atlanta
I am a Smith & Wesson shooter and collector. My tastes with revolvers usually runs to the traditional, but when the M&P R8 came out something really grabbed me about it. I know the gun arouses strong emotions and opinions from both ends of the spectrum, and believe me, I'm no "mall ninja", but this was one that I had to have. Back in September I found one locally lightly used for just under $700. I dove on it. Then, on the drive home I noticed that the barrel was just perceptably loose. When I got home and inspected it further I found that the muzzle retention ring was loose. I have a feeling that the previous owner probably dealt the gun rather than deal with the issue. The gunsmith at the shop where I bought the gun offered to try and tighten it, but I decided that the gun should go back to Smith to have the problem resolved. This would assure that it was done correctly, and it would give Smith the opportunity to evaluate what was going on. Despite the fact that I was not the original owner of the gun Smith sent me a label telling me that they would take care of it. I had the gun back within a month. Since it had to go back to the Performance Center I considered the turn-around time to be excellent.

Once back the gun sat in my safe for five months unshot. This past Friday I shot the R8 for the first time. I'm certainly not new to S&W revolvers having shot them for decades, but this one really was something quite special. Considering the frame I expected a bit more recoil than usual with both .38 Special and .357, but it was quite the contrary with the gun shooting extremely smooth with less of the recoil that I would expect with a similar steel framed revolver. Yes, the single action trigger is outstanding, and the double action quite good (possibly just a tiny bit disappointing for a Performance Center gun) but this revolver was making me look so darned good. I find most S&W revolvers to be inherently accurate, but I was shooting to a whole new level with the R8.

My conclusion is that a lot of it had to do with the balance of the gun which I found to be just about perfect. Beyond the R8 itself, three and five inch barrels seem so right to me to begin with. I won't give a range report but suffice it to say that I left the range with a very big smile on my face.

Then just to add icing on the cake, Smith & Wesson customer service stepped up to the plate once again and hit another one out of the park. No, the barrel retention nut wasn't loose again (tight as a drum) but I noticed that I didn't have the four screws to attach the top rail. While I don't shoot pistols with scopes I thought that I might like to try it some time in the future. The CS associate at Smith didn't ask for a serial number, or any payment, and just took my name and address and said that screws would be on the way. That just adds to the whole experience and is another reason why I own many Smith & Wesson firearms.

mpr8.jpg
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Good to hear that the gun is as good for someone else.

I think my slight dissappointment with the double action trigger is that it could be just a bit lighter and maybe a hair smoother, but I think that my problem might be that I'm comparing it to the DA trigger on some of my older Smiths and my Colts which are downright buttery smooth. I also dry fired an R8 that had a trigger job done by a local smith and it was rather incredible.
 
I felt the way you did when I first saw the R-8, I had to have one. So, I bought one, brand new. Before I ever shot it, I did a basic slick action job on it and put in an extended firing pin from Cylinder and Slide.

The revolver is incredible. I shot MANY a "Thursday Night Thunder" IPSC matches with it right along side of the race gun boys, you shoot what you bring. As long as its IPSC legal, have at it. I always placed in the top 10. Those guys literally HATED to be shown up aganst "A REVOLVER."

I carried it anytime I went to town on busness in a Galco dual position Phoenix and two full moon clip reloads either under a business jacket or my Domke vest. The revolver is incredibly light easy to manage full house 125 grain Federals, and is a joy to carry for an N-frame.

Its a GOOD feeling walking along knowing you have that firepower. I wish I was packing it here in Afghanistan instead of this Beretta.

WC
 

Attachments

  • 8times_jpg_w300h247.jpg
    8times_jpg_w300h247.jpg
    15 KB · Views: 734
Yup, that is significant firepower! Everytime that cylinder swings open and I look at eight rather than five, six or seven I have to grin.

I may have the smith who I referred to do a little work on the trigger, but I'm doing so well with it I might just leave well enough alone.
 
I have one too . . .

and couldn't agree more about all of the good things that have been said. One of the 2 most accurate revolvers I've ever owned (the other is another Smith - a PC 629 "Hunter").

Mine has an Ultradot mounted in alloy rings from TPS. It's a bulky combo set up this way, but very controllable, accurate, easy to shoot, and fun!

I also like the "retaining nut" system on this gun (even though it came loose on the OP). This seems a better way to secure the barrel than engaging the rifling with a tool and cranking the barrel in, as I'm told is done on the other 2-piece barrel Smiths. That just don't seem right.

see ya
 
and couldn't agree more about all of the good things that have been said. One of the 2 most accurate revolvers I've ever owned (the other is another Smith - a PC 629 "Hunter").

Mine has an Ultradot mounted in alloy rings from TPS. It's a bulky combo set up this way, but very controllable, accurate, easy to shoot, and fun!

I also like the "retaining nut" system on this gun (even though it came loose on the OP). This seems a better way to secure the barrel than engaging the rifling with a tool and cranking the barrel in, as I'm told is done on the other 2-piece barrel Smiths. That just don't seem right.

see ya

I consider that loose retaining nut a blessing as I would bet dollars to donuts that had it not been loose I never would have gotten that gun and at that price :D I could have returned the gun for a full refund, but with Smith CS it was a no-brainer to keep it.
 
I have one of these R8s. It had been on my short list for a while. I was at the toy store one day getting ready to buy a 327 Night Guard when the store owner asked me if I wanted a R8 because he was getting one in. I told him to put my name on it. I bought the Night Guard as well. One expensive visit. But I do love the R8! I may put some Ahrends on it if I can find a really dark set.
 
I have been reading every piece of information about the R8, and 99% is all fantastic reviews. I am ready for my first revolver, its simply trying to find an R8 in stock under a $1000.00.

I envy you owners, but I too will own an R8 soon.
 
A while back I traded away my 627-4 8x.38 Super (which was the worst S&W revolver I ever owned) so I desperately needed a real 8 shooter, which at this point was going to be a .357 Magnum. I took a long look at an R8 but decided not to get it. It was too expensive and the alloy frame is a turnoff. Judging from the reports of shooters who own N Frames with alloy frames and actually use them, the durability just isn't there. I want mine to be both a match and carry gun and it will definitely see hard use. The barrel is a turnoff too. I did not like the 5" barrel of the Super and I always preferred the 4" barrel for its versatility. I see the two piece barrel as a cost cutting measure and want nothing to do with that. And I think the barrel has polygonal rifling, which is not good for a revolver that must shoot lots of cast bullets. It was easy to walk away from this revolver. I'm glad I did because shortly thereafter I found a nice used 627-5 with 4" normal contour barrel. My -5 is significantly heavier, but I like all that extra steel. I put Miculek grips on mine too, and I'm surprised at comfortable it is to shoot full power ammo. These grips were always painful on my 625s.

Put 5000 rounds through your R8 and let us know how it's holding up. I don't believe what I read in the magazines and I'd like some feedback that has credibility.

Dave Sinko
 
Put 5000 rounds through your R8 and let us know how it's holding up. I don't believe what I read in the magazines and I'd like some feedback that has credibility.

I have close to that many through mine, almost exclusively lead. Still going strong. It's been back to the factory twice:

1. Barrel tensioning nut came loose (or wasn't properly torqued from the factory)--happened after about 100rds. Fixed under warranty.
2. I had a primer failure (on my reloads) that blew out the side of the primer and torched the firing pin bushing. S&W fixed it on their dime.

It still locks up tight and is one of my most accurate revolvers.

SW_MPR8_CMore.jpg
 
Great post. Knock the revolver but, don't offer any information about why you hated it and got rid of it.:rolleyes:

If you want to know, ask me properly. Otherwise back off.

You be nice to me and I'll do the same.

The members of this forum won't tolerate anything less.

And just so you know, I am entitled to express my opinion without having to explain myself to you or anyone else.

NOW, I will tell you I did not like it.

Light primer strikes with or without full moon clips. Did not matter what ammo I used. Gunsmith looked at it and no change.

Also for such an expensive gun, it had the worst trigger pull when compared to other S&W products that cost much less.

So I got rid of it.
 
I see the two piece barrel arrangement isn't all it's cracked up to be, no pun intended. I hope this shortcut was worth it to S&W.

How do you blow out the side of a primer? The only way I can see this happening is with a very high primer and I think at that point you'd realize how high it is when the cylinder doesn't close properly.

Light hits seem to be a problem which afflicts many revolvers with the new "improved" frame mounted firing pin design. It's not limited to the R8 or any other single model.

The trigger pull is also hit or miss. I tend to expect the worst and I always end up adjusting the spring weights at the very least.

Is it possible to buy an R8 and fit a normal one piece barrel?

Dave Sinko
 
I now have about 3500 rounds through my R8, just about all of them cheap Blazer 158 grain LRN and 148 grain WC's. I still enjoy the revolver and it produces fantastic accuracy.

I did send the R8 back to the factory, my main complaint was that the barrel nut came loose. While it was going back I also complained about the extractor rod coming loose and the trigger pull having just a touch of gritty feeling to it near the release in DA (I only shoot DA, well 99.9% of the time).

The factory fixed the barrel nut, replaced the hand and the extractor rod. I can say the action is significantly smoother and now it is just as accurate as before.

I have had a few problems with this revolver, but it is a machine and they wear and have defects. The positive strengths of my R8 outweigh the negatives in my opinion.
 
i think the r8 is a great idea and i've always wanted one.....and i'm glad that nobody on this forum is sensitive. if they were, then their feelings might really get hurt!
 
If you want to know, ask me properly. Otherwise back off.

You be nice to me and I'll do the same.

The members of this forum won't tolerate anything less.

And just so you know, I am entitled to express my opinion without having to explain myself to you or anyone else.

NOW, I will tell you I did not like it.

Light primer strikes with or without full moon clips. Did not matter what ammo I used. Gunsmith looked at it and no change.

Also for such an expensive gun, it had the worst trigger pull when compared to other S&W products that cost much less.

So I got rid of it.

I apologize. Shouldn't have jumped on you like that. Friends? :)
 
Well, if there are anymore dissatisfied owners out there please keep me in mind if you would like to sell or trade.
 
Back
Top