Most disappointing add-on part for your M&P15

Vinney47

Vinney47

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2012
Messages
524
Reaction score
245
Location
Salt Lake City, UT
what is the most disappointing part/accessory/addition that has been added to your M&P15?

for me it was a FAB defense (Mako group) t-pod G2. I had the grip/ bi-pod on a mini-14 that was somewhat tactical. sold the mini when prices sky rocketed and got an M&P15x for a few hundred less a couple weeks later. went to add the t-pod that I'd kept but just wasn't happy with it on the 15x, added to much weight and bulk (I know it's odd that that didn't bother me on the mini). I really liked the T-pod but it was just blah for me when moved to the carbine length AR-15 platform.
 
Register to hide this ad
jayman9207 said:
Same here.......sending it back today.
Click to expand...

Same here....lol....just sent mine back too. Got the VFG and that works MUCH better for me.

Another one that was disappointing was the grip/bipod. Not strong enough, not adjustable and too heavy. I find it much better to keep the Magpul VFG on there permanently and put on a UTG bipod (surprisingly great quality) only when needed.
 
same here on the AFG - although mine's on my 15-22 - my 15 has a Troy VFG. The Magpul AFG just doesn't do anything for me.
 
Wow, I was thinking of the AFG, might skip it now. I get a VFG with my KAC quad rail, guess I'll just put that on instead.
 
You guys with the VFG. Are u using the long or shorter one. I was thinking of getting a shorter one, but didnt know how easily it could be gripped.

As for the AFG, thats probably the most useless thing magpul has ever made.
 
The magpul AFG is actually what I tried next to replace the t-pod grip/bi-pod combo. I've only had it out shooting once, but I like it.

When I first put it on my rifle, I didn't like it so much. Felt awkward in my hand, I felt silly for buying it and wanted it off my rifle ASAP. But after holding it for about 5 minutes I started to adjust and understand what it's about and what it's doing for me. It's different than any VFG, different ergonomics and it didn't make sense at first grasp. But after spending just a little time with it I found I really like it. Swapping in the smooth piece instead of the finger groove only made it better for me. Now when I grab my rifle with the AFG it feels very natural. I even like how it streamlines the front end of my rifle compared to a VFG.

I had planned to order a magpul RVG for a shorter, lighter VFG as a possible option, but haven't felt the need to even try it after acclimating to the AFG.

I'm not saying everyone will or should have the same experience as me with the AFG, or imply that those who didn't like it didn't give it enough time, only that it's definitely worth giving it a shot. If it does work for you, it's awesome.

Edit: I have the AFG2, to be specific.
 
Last edited:
Smitty357 said:
You guys with the VFG. Are u using the long or shorter one. I was thinking of getting a shorter one, but didnt know how easily it could be gripped.

As for the AFG, thats probably the most useless thing magpul has ever made.
Click to expand...

My Troy VFG is threaded to change the size from short to long. On paper and looks'wise - I like it shorter - but in reality I always end up putting the section that can be removed back on.
 
I really like my afg....I add a bipod when I need one...quick and easy....The Most disappointing addition....wow thats tough for me I have a couple...One would be the grip pod, although I still have my USMC one. The other was an AR-15 upper with dust cover and F/A....
 
The AFG vs VFG debate would, in all likelihood be dependant on how you hold the rifle. Classic style may not need a grip. The downside of a VFG is that it doesn't address muzzle rise. IMHO, the AFG helps if you are using a C-grip with your thumb completely over the top rail (and you have a large hand).

Having learned the classic rifle support using off-hand method, both take some getting used to. If you are using that method, the AFG certainly seems odd.

Regardless, there are plenty of people that will purchase a slightly used AFG. I bought one for my 15-22, and when I got my M&P15 VTAC, another AFG and spare mags were purchased at the same time.

To each their own.
 
My complaint isn't as much with AFG product as it is for the fact that it will not work right with my current rifle. I have the Troy VTAC rail and you add on the smaller rail sections to where you want to add something to the rail. Because of this there is about a 1/2"+ gap between where the AFG mounts and where the rail is and it just felt very awkward. The AFG sticks way out from the rail.

I have both of the Tapco Intrafuse Verticle Grips and really like them both. I tend to keep the stubby one on more than the larger one though. I like the extra storage in the larger one though a lot. I bought the AFG because I liked the way it felt on another rifle but it just won't work with my rail.
 
This is my first AFG2...I bought it for a Hi Point 45 Carbine....when I traded it for a 1911 pistol....I got the AFG2 back he prefers Vertical Grips...I just got the Hi Point back in another trade which means I actually got the 1911 for 200 rounds of ammo...LOL....I will be putting the AFG2 back on the Hi Point. I havent tried the bigger AFG's.

As far as the dustcover and F/A upper receiver...It was engraved with the Marine Corps emblem and said "the few, the proud, Marines" I received it in a package deal and really inexpensively. All parts from Brownells... I never thought about them...This Sport will stay the way it was designed as far as the receiver, barrel, BCG combination. :D but the debate can go on forever....it is just a matter of personal choice....I carried a 60 in the corps, we didnt have vertical grips of any kind back then....
 
jayman9207 said:
My complaint isn't as much with AFG product as it is for the fact that it will not work right with my current rifle. I have the Troy VTAC rail and you add on the smaller rail sections to where you want to add something to the rail. Because of this there is about a 1/2"+ gap between where the AFG mounts and where the rail is and it just felt very awkward. The AFG sticks way out from the rail.

I have both of the Tapco Intrafuse Verticle Grips and really like them both. I tend to keep the stubby one on more than the larger one though. I like the extra storage in the larger one though a lot. I bought the AFG because I liked the way it felt on another rifle but it just won't work with my rail.
Click to expand...

I have a M&P15 VTAC as well. I put both short rails on the bottom, attached the AFG to the "rear-ward" one. The front rail just has the front lip of the AFG, effectively holding it in place AND not leaving a gap. The rest of the 2" front short rail I use for the bipod. There is just enough room for it.

No, it's not ideal, but your other option would be to get a longer bottom rail.

Still, love the VTAC...
 
Most disappointing add-on....

Millet DMS-1 optic. Chinese junk it is. Replaced it with an ACOG.

mp15-5.jpg
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Echo40
My M&P15X Police Trade-in has arrived!
2
Replies
27
Views
5K
gunny4053
gunny4053
T
Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 build 2022
Replies
9
Views
4K
Eric300
Eric300
ddeanjohnson
  • Locked
WITHDRAWN --WTS- GUN BOOKS -- MAKE AN OFFER
2 3
Replies
45
Views
9K
ddeanjohnson
ddeanjohnson
N
M&P15- Upgrading Buffer & Spring (Tuning) questions...
Replies
2
Views
597
nighttrainnc
N
KEwer
Helping picking out a M&P15.
2 3
Replies
42
Views
3K
5point5sixGUY
5point5sixGUY

Latest posts

Back
Top