I am not one for twisted logic, but I am really peeved when I hear people advocate that victims of a shooting should be able to sue the firearms' manufacturer. I was really upset when a judge granted the families of the victims of Sandy Hook the right to file suit against Bushmaster. I strongly believe that the manufacturer can not be held responsible for how the end user uses their products.
That being said, and the fact that the precedent has been set where the survivors of Sandy Hook were permitted to sue Bushmaster, I believe that I should be able to sue General Motors for building the Cadillac that an errant motorist used to hit me and leave me disabled.
Would anyone have any comments about my idea of a parallel liability suit?
That being said, and the fact that the precedent has been set where the survivors of Sandy Hook were permitted to sue Bushmaster, I believe that I should be able to sue General Motors for building the Cadillac that an errant motorist used to hit me and leave me disabled.
Would anyone have any comments about my idea of a parallel liability suit?