If I am ever so unfortunate to have to fire a sidearm in self defense, I am more than willing to trade the sidearm deployed for my life. In my belief, that is a no brainer. I don't own highly engraved show pieces, I own dependable and reliable firearms. I want to avoid any sidearm that has a built-in Achilles heel for failure. My priority is making it home to my family at the end of the day.
My concern, is that based on the direction of this thread, many respondents appear to be suggesting that even if you come out on top in a gunfight, you will lose in your ability to continue exercising your Second Amendment rights.
I realize that you don't often hear or read about successful efforts at defending ones life from an armed attacker, but when you do, you rarely see the aftermath, because that doesn't contribute to ratings for the media. Prior to reading this thread, I was of the belief that if I had to use deadly force to protect my life or that of my family, that only the sidearm I used would be seized for an indefinite period of time, but many responses here seem to suggest that all of your firearms could be seized.
Can anyone that has been in this situation share how their Second Amendment rights have been impacted as a result of a justifiable shoot?