The variegated history of Hoyt holsters

rednichols

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,745
Reaction score
8,478
Location
southern hemisphere
Rarely has Hoyt's history been reviewed completely, so therefore not accurately. This is a man who went to an Indian school as did both Tom Threepersons Cherokee and Tom Three Persons Blood -- even though he wasn't Indian!

Dick Hoyt proudest time in life appears to have been as an Army aviator during WWI, when pilots were part of the Army Signal Corps; according to an interview he gave shortly before his death in the late 1980s.

He was posted in San Diego at that time, having persisted to become a pilot over, say, a machine gunner for lack of a college degree. He tells us they had no parachutes for the biplanes then so it was either land, or crash and die. Shot down two planes -- "me, both times" -- because his planes had machine guns mounted behind the propellor and the synchronising of the two was often faulty.

One could be forgiven for wondering if he and his plane(s) could have ended up serving in the first foray by the U.S. for planes in battle, when Pershing sent them against Pancho Villa during the punitive expedition of 1916/17. Considered a failure for aviation, it is credited for teaching the Army what it needed to fight in Europe with aircraft 1917/18.

Released from service there, he ended up a sales representative for E.E. Clark's holster company in L.A. From there he filed two patents, for shoulder holsters with two different kinds of springs: one of the flat style, and one of the wire form style for which Hoyt is most famous today (as is Clark and later Bucheimer which bought Clark from E.E.'s son E.J. who worked for them and later for Safariland).

Accordingly, there were several eras of Hoyt holsters. Hoyt located at first, not in Los Angeles per se, but in El Monte which had been a separate city since 1912. Something to do with the New Deal in the 1930s attracting residents to housing there. Holsters appear to have been made there 1940 to 1960. Readily distinguished from the front by the very odd basket weave stamping that must have been very fast compared with the then-traditional method.

Then from L.A. county to Orange county and the better known address in Costa Mesa: by 20 years after his patents issued Dick has handed off to his son in law Woody Hershmann, who operates it there until 1980. By then I'm deducing that the products liability climate in California has become inhospitable for police holster makers -- at least one P.D. in the late 1970s is after them because it seems holsters aren't absolute security against BGs -- and Hoyt reincorporates in the latter Coupeville WA address.

The latter two Hoyt holsters are difficult to differentiate from the front views we get most often in pics, because in both eras Woody has settled on the traditional basketweave pattern. It helps to know that around 1970 the 'jacket style' belt loop became standardised amongst all forward-draw holster makers; prior the Hoyt had a tunnel stitched to the backside.

Masses of stitching on a Hoyt since Day One, mostly on the backside. The holster was mostly assembled, the spring inserted at the mouth end, the holster stitched closed, and the excess leather trimmed away. Not at all obvious to the rest of us during the '70s, but we knew we didn't want to work it out anyway, and went our own way with, for example, the Bianchi 27K and the comparable Safety Speed (the better of the two) (Shoemaker's was very similar to the Hoyt methodology).

I'll post up some pics.
 
2 costa mesa hoyt circa 1960 (1).jpg Costa Mesa, and a 'transitional' model in that it appears that Dick has made this one himself (odd basket weave pattern)

2 costa mesa hoyt circa 1960 (2).jpg The tunnel loop on the backside, that was standard when I first encountered the holster in the late 1960s.

2 costa mesa hoyt circa 1970 (1).jpg Now using the 'standard' basketweave pattern. Difficult to imagine is the 'jacket style' belt loop that is on the backside, which creates a slot into which the Eisenhower jacket could fit while zipped against the weather.
 
Excellent detailed information as usual, Red, thanks for taking the time to post this.
I've always been impressed with Hoyt's floral carving as it's very different. Here's an example.
image.jpg

image.jpg

I have some literature as well-a 1935 Hoyt brochure and a Clark brochure with Hoyt listed as agent.
Hoyt brochure
image.jpg

image.jpg

Clark brochure
image.jpg

image.jpg

Holster history by the Holstorian ! Thanks again, Red.Regards,
turnerriver
 
Very good from turnerriver :-).

When we think of blokes like Dick Hoyt, it's easy to think of ancients not from our world; he was born in the 1890s. But this pic of Dick from an interview in WA before his death tells us that he was a man of our times:

dick hoyt (2).jpg


This is how a Hoyt is made (A.E. Nelson built a version as well):

hoyt stamping (2).jpg

My crude lines show that the holster is largely built, then the spring stuffed into the layers at the top; then stitched shut and the excess trimmed off. Hoyt's spring configuration places the main bend/return/bight below the trigger guard. This allows the spring to move in torsion and flex completely as the revolver moves forward.

The Bianchi #27, in contrast, was a simple 'u' shaped wireworm and only flexed at the tip. This created 'muzzle drag' and we never did solve it properly. It was the Safety Speed, which used a spring quite like the old Sterlings for folk like Lone Wolf Gonzaulles, that solved it well by placing the bight behind the barrel vs. in the front.
 
I've posted this one up before, I think, but it's a nice one. I have one at home with I believe a floral design, turnerriver may have given it to me. I'm on the road to Tulsa right now, will look for the floral when I get home.

IMG_6015x5_zpsbox1yuic.jpg


IMG_6018x4_zps2vilrhor.jpg

An early one, not indicated by the city, which is obliterated by the patent stamp; but rather by the edge stamping that is rolled on (you'll see it on both the brown early shoulder holster I posted, and the Threepersons that turnerriver posted; a series of what are called 'cam' or 'camouflage' tools, in this case on a roller rather than by hand, one crescent at a time).

Dick's story reminds me that, of the 50 or so men who figure in Holstory that I could have met (i.e., I was of age in the U.S. 1966 and they were living), I met about half (some, like Roy Baker and Elmer Keith, not more than a handshake at a trade show; others like Gene DeSantis and John Bianchi in whose home I've stayed). Fewer than another 20 had died before the '60s; from men like Wroe, Shelton, and Heiser who were born early in the 19th century, to men like August Brill and A.H. Hardy who died in the '50s.
 
Last edited:
Query for turnerriver, regarding your images of Clark and Hoyt brochures: the dating of the 'Hoyt by Hoyt' brochure duly noted as 1935 (printed on it), for some reason I already hold the 'Hoyt as Clark' brochure as 1936.

But. The Clark brochure shows Hoyt's pouch type holsters as does the Hoyt brochure; but the shoulder holster is Clark's(patent issued to E.E. in 1930) whereas Hoyt's exclusive brochure shows his own shoulder holster patent issued 1936.

That suggests to me that the Hoyt as Clark brochure is earlier than the Hoyt by Hoyt brochure dated 1935. Would you be able to shed some light on your own dating of the former?

P.S. I hold a third brochure that is Clark-only, showing the Clark spring shoulder holster and the Clark spring crossdraw holster, no pouch holsters; also as 1936 because of its postmark.
 
Here is a Hoyt crossdraw. I don't have a photo of the back handy, but
in the football shaped mark it says R. H. HOYT MAKER PAT. NO. Then
below the football it has 2,109,232. Below that it says 357 4.
Probably made for 4" N Frame S&W .357. Extremely strong spring in
it. Shown, in my photo, with Model 19.
 

Attachments

  • SAM_0161.jpg
    SAM_0161.jpg
    135.8 KB · Views: 41
Query for turnerriver, regarding your images of Clark and Hoyt brochures: the dating of the 'Hoyt by Hoyt' brochure duly noted as 1935 (printed on it), for some reason I already hold the 'Hoyt as Clark' brochure as 1936.

But. The Clark brochure shows Hoyt's pouch type holsters as does the Hoyt brochure; but the shoulder holster is Clark's(patent issued to E.E. in 1930) whereas Hoyt's exclusive brochure shows his own shoulder holster patent issued 1936.

That suggests to me that the Hoyt as Clark brochure is earlier than the Hoyt by Hoyt brochure dated 1935. Would you be able to shed some light on your own dating of the former?

P.S. I hold a third brochure that is Clark-only, showing the Clark spring shoulder holster and the Clark spring crossdraw holster, no pouch holsters; also as 1936 because of its postmark.
Red, I went over the Hoyt/Clark brochure and couldn't find a date. To add to the confusion I also have a Clark brochure listing Frank Pachmayr as the agent/distributor with a handwritten date of 11/25/35 inked on it. So I can't shed any light unfortunately. If I come across any other information I'll let you know.
Regards,
turnerriver
 
Red, I went over the Hoyt/Clark brochure and couldn't find a date. To add to the confusion I also have a Clark brochure listing Frank Pachmayr as the agent/distributor with a handwritten date of 11/25/35 inked on it. So I can't shed any light unfortunately. If I come across any other information I'll let you know.
Regards,
turnerriver

Thanks so much, John. I've decided to hold my brochure as 1930, because E.E. Clark (there was also a son, E.J., with holster patents) received his patent no. in 1930; and Hoyt has replaced it with his patent-pending holster at the same address. That's quite rough (so, 1930-1935) and may be as close as I ever get.

Hoyt is in the 1930 census in L.A. as a salesman for a leather shop (and so I deduce for Clark); and all the 1935 census will show me (which actually appears as a single line in all the 1940 census), is where he was living in that year.

That particular brochure could just as easily be one of the in-between years. But unlikely to be earlier, or later.

Which reminds me: the where and why of Arvo Ojala is quite a tale. Maybe I'll start on thread on it at some point. His career was incredibly short for such a famous personality. More refinements have appeared in the Berns-Martin chronology, too.
 
Last edited:
Talked to a guy at the Tulsa Show today who was partners with Blackie Collins and purchased a building for Berns-Martin to move into. Bianchi apparently bought out B-M before that could happen.
(I sold the guy 3 B-M holsters, he was nostalgic about them!)

Hopefully you thought to get his contact details?
 
I'm fascinated to discover from JayCeenC's pics, that these are only half-lined (upper half). Which signifies that the spring is also only half size (doesn't extend down to the muzzle as the forward draws do). Love my new, giant monitor!

You do know this is a shoulder holster, right? Minus its harness. That's part of the patent, and why it has the odd strap on the backside that passes through the holster muzzle itself: to pull the pistol closer against the body. Clever man, Dick Hoyt, shoulder holster makers from Hardy to Bianchi have unsuccessfully fought against this to no avail.
 
Last edited:
Yes, Red, the strap on the rear matches the 1935 patent drawing that wheelgun610 posted in the other Hoyt thread making this a shoulder holster configuration.
The spring does only extend halfway down; this makes the bottom part of the holster a bit limp and floppy. But when worn with a gun inserted I don't think that affects the integrity of the rig.
 
Yes, Red, the strap on the rear matches the 1935 patent drawing that wheelgun610 posted in the other Hoyt thread making this a shoulder holster configuration.
The spring does only extend halfway down; this makes the bottom part of the holster a bit limp and floppy. But when worn with a gun inserted I don't think that affects the integrity of the rig.

Oh, I agree that the shortened spring is AOK; I just hadn't noticed that the shoulder and cross draw holsters of the period don't have full length springs. I did have one in my own collection, and I still have pics of it, in which the spring of the shoulder holster went all the way down. It was from the Coupeville period and for an auto.
 
Back
Top