Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > Gun Leather & Carry Gear

Notices

Gun Leather & Carry Gear All Holster and Gun Leather Topics


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-05-2022, 06:01 PM
snub649 snub649 is offline
Member
holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: pgh pa
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default holster guestion

hi everyone, long time lurker,first time poster. when carrying owb, what are the pros/cons to belt loops vs belt snaps? any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-05-2022, 06:09 PM
Bald1's Avatar
Bald1 Bald1 is offline
Member
holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion  
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 3,010
Likes: 2,250
Liked 5,553 Times in 1,999 Posts
Default

Snaps allow for easier holster removal. That’s all I can think of
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 08-06-2022, 07:37 PM
DaSvenska's Avatar
DaSvenska DaSvenska is offline
Member
holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion  
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 40
Likes: 87
Liked 23 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Agree with Bald1. That said, I feel belt loops are more firmly secure.
__________________
-Swede-
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-06-2022, 08:34 PM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 19,638
Liked 11,913 Times in 5,408 Posts
Default

Loops are more secure and the lack of a section of overlapping leather and snap makes loop holsters slimmer. Snaps may make it easier to put on and/or take off the holster, although I'm not convinced it's that big of a benefit.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-06-2022, 09:32 PM
BloodyThumb's Avatar
BloodyThumb BloodyThumb is offline
Member
holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion  
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Indyucky
Posts: 388
Likes: 99
Liked 578 Times in 197 Posts
Default

There is no doubt that loops are more secure than snaps, but I have been using snap on strong side OWB holsters off duty for probably 20 years. I had issues with only one. The first I bought was a Galco that I believe they called a Super Side Snap. I remember the models were SSS and a number. I did have that one unsnap on me once or twice. I took it to a leather works shop in the city and they replaced the snaps with heavier one way snaps and I never had another issue. That was for a 4" 1911.

I have a Lou Alessi for 5" 1911 that I have had nearly as long. I also have a Matt DelFatti for my High Powers. Both of those are old and heavily used. Never an issue. In and out of vehicles and an occasional scuffle. They stayed put. I trust them.

I also have a cross draw snap on for a G19 set up for long stints sitting in a car. It was made by Privateer leather and is only about 5 years old. No issues with it.

If you look at the DelFatti and Privateer you will see that the part that folds over the belt are larger and double snap. Very secure.

My own opinion would be that if you decide to go with a snap on, stay away from cheap factory built and get a good one. It makes a big difference.

Buy once, cry once.
__________________
BT
EGO VOLUNTAS HAUD OBEDIO
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 08-06-2022, 09:38 PM
rednichols's Avatar
rednichols rednichols is offline
Member
holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion holster guestion  
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,501
Likes: 1,858
Liked 7,761 Times in 2,129 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snub649 View Post
hi everyone, long time lurker,first time poster. when carrying owb, what are the pros/cons to belt loops vs belt snaps? any thoughts?
As a gunleather designer/maker for a half century, including the Pistol Pocket for Bianchi, I'll advise that for an IWB you really will want snap-off. There is no downside and lots of upside, because we designers expect you are inserting the holstered pistol into your cinched up trousers just before setting out on your 'mission', and removing it for bathroom breaks.

This one is the first of the 'advanced iwb' holsters in which the holster is angled for max concealment and moulded of leather equal to an OWB; by the long defunct Seventrees but heavily copied ever since its intro in 1969:

in living color (7).jpg

There are variants that place the snap-off loops on either side of the holster pocket, such as from Sparks (Bucheimer-Clark was first though, in the late '70s, but also long defunct) that is flatter than the Seventrees approach but also takes up lots more space along the belt line.

Screenshot (1499).jpg

For either of the two I've shown you'll want either vintage, or a contemporary copy (that that the sellers like Sparks will claim are originals).
__________________
Red Nichols The Holstorian

Last edited by rednichols; 08-06-2022 at 09:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smolt guestion steelslaver S&W-Smithing 15 10-15-2020 11:34 AM
28-2 Guestion Also klondyke46 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3 07-07-2012 01:53 PM
9mm or .40, that is the guestion chance1959 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 38 07-03-2011 09:41 PM
Dumb Guestion ? TonyR Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 3 04-07-2009 07:08 PM
Unusual '56 J frame guestion Gatorbaitor S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 5 04-06-2009 04:09 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)