First, a "Dali" is an artist named Salvador. The lama (not llama) is the Dalai. And Llama is a gun brand made by Gabilondo y Cia. in Spain.
Now that I've shown off how erudite I am (that and about five bucks will get me a cup of coffee almost anywhere), let's address the .357 Comanche.
A VERY well gun writer of a few years back got one, on a trip to the factory, I think. He told me that it was of surprisingly good quality, not that far from contemporary US revolvers. Those had a lot of QC problems then, especially cylinder timing. This definitely did include S&W guns.
He shot the Comanche a fair bit, and he was an exceedingly observant, critical man. Actually, he wrote about hunting more than he reviewed guns, because he didn't want to upset editors and advertisers by saying what he thought of many guns being made then. Mind you, the man had plenty of American handguns. He wasn't some hick hack who fell off the turnip truck and had seen only the Llama Comanche.
He had other guns to compare it to.
If he spoke well of it, and he did, I strongly suspect that if a particular example checks out okay quality -wise, as with other brands, it will do well by you. This doesn't mean that it's fully the equal of a S&W in all respects. But it'll come pretty close. I would like to know whether the action parts are cast, and how they're hardened. (The Spanish don't always use the same investment casting process that Ruger does.)
Those who know Spanish revolvers tend to rate the Astra higher, but not a lot.
I wouldn't buy one in lieu of a Smith or Ruger, and the Comanche has been discontinued, I think. Parts and service may be an issue. If you need to save money, look for a used S&W or Ruger. But if you just want to try the Llama or someone isn't heavily "into" guns and wants a solid revolver at a probably good price, I think the Comanche won't scalp him. That's more than could be said for its namesake, at one time!
T-Star