Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > General Topics > The Lounge

The Lounge A Catch-All Area for NON-GUN topics.
PUT GUN TOPICS in the GUN FORUMS.
Keep it Family Friendly. See The Rules for Banned Topics!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2012, 02:03 PM
Tunachaser's Avatar
Tunachaser Tunachaser is offline
US Veteran
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Charleston,SC
Posts: 510
Likes: 34
Liked 238 Times in 68 Posts
Default You do not need 3.5" shells

to kill ducks. My daughter was top gun last week at our place in Arkansas using her Benelli 20ga pump.





Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2012, 02:07 PM
Dueeast's Avatar
Dueeast Dueeast is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jersey shore
Posts: 807
Likes: 79
Liked 203 Times in 83 Posts
Default

Nice buncha greenheads! All my friends shoot 3 and a half. I prefer the 3", but I use 12 ga.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2012, 03:24 PM
Tunachaser's Avatar
Tunachaser Tunachaser is offline
US Veteran
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Charleston,SC
Posts: 510
Likes: 34
Liked 238 Times in 68 Posts
Default

Me too pal, my Beretta will handle 3.5, but I never buy em, I think it is a wast of money, and I load 2 3/4 in the morning for wood ducks and teal................I like to eat the ducks we shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2012, 03:36 PM
Texas Star Texas Star is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,360
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,158 Times in 7,409 Posts
Default

You have a very attractive daughter. So do I, but she can't shoot worth diddly. Not into guns, although she likes the S&W M-60 .38 and may learn to shoot one better.

Nice bunch of mallards, too. Congratulations. If that girl cooks as well as she shoots, you're twice blessed!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2012, 03:49 PM
DGNY DGNY is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Garden Spot, Upstate NY, USA
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 3,390
Liked 751 Times in 447 Posts
Default

Excellent pictorial report on what must have been a fun time.

And your dog looks v-e-r-y proud. Nice!

Regards,

Dyson
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2012, 03:55 PM
David LaPell's Avatar
David LaPell David LaPell is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,541
Likes: 667
Liked 6,774 Times in 1,312 Posts
Default

I agree, but alot of the 3 1/2 shell thing is just like everything else, theyread it in a gun rag telling them that to kill ducks or turkeys or whatever else it just has to be that or nothing. I blame the same element on the whole .30-30 won't kill deer, the .357 Magnum won't work for personal defense, and it has to be done with a 15 round mag or it can't be done crowd.

I have been using a 16 gauge or a 20 gauge for years on all sorts of game and have never been let down yet.
__________________
Vaya con Dios
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2012, 03:55 PM
sipowicz's Avatar
sipowicz sipowicz is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gun lovin\' Hollywood Ca.
Posts: 10,234
Likes: 7,741
Liked 18,710 Times in 3,792 Posts
Default

Congrats to your daughter.

Btw, that third pic is just begging for a caption....
__________________
Thirty characters. Exactly...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2012, 04:11 PM
35Rem's Avatar
35Rem 35Rem is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SE Alabama, near Dothan
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 772
Liked 791 Times in 365 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Star View Post
You have a very attractive daughter. So do I, but she can't shoot worth diddly. Not into guns, although she likes the S&W M-60 .38 and may learn to shoot one better.

Nice bunch of mallards, too. Congratulations. If that girl cooks as well as she shoots, you're twice blessed!
More like a curse, as a father...

Congrats. I've never been a magnum fan, but have recently got into the 3.5" gun. I figure that I don't get to waterfowl much, and need every advantage I can get. I can use it for turkeys, too. It's all pretty new to me. (hunting is not, just those 2 types)
__________________
War Eagle! '10 BCS & '13 SEC
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2012, 04:50 PM
venomballistics's Avatar
venomballistics venomballistics is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between beers
Posts: 8,989
Likes: 4,809
Liked 7,051 Times in 3,359 Posts
Default

I'd agree 3.5 is a bit over the top for most fowl ... its a goose round anyhow ... but my my my what a tube full of goodness with buckshot
__________________
it just needs more voltage
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-07-2012, 06:19 PM
amazingflapjack amazingflapjack is offline
US Veteran
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 5,947
Likes: 24,644
Liked 6,195 Times in 2,575 Posts
Default

The dog looks like he needs a milk bone and a nap!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-07-2012, 07:04 PM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 18,009
Likes: 7,994
Liked 26,328 Times in 8,847 Posts
Default

I've never fired a 3 1/2 " shell in my life. Always use 2 3/4". I have some 3 inch ones, but the boxes are still full.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-07-2012, 07:23 PM
Tunachaser's Avatar
Tunachaser Tunachaser is offline
US Veteran
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Charleston,SC
Posts: 510
Likes: 34
Liked 238 Times in 68 Posts
Default

the dog works more than we do, that's for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-07-2012, 09:30 PM
CajunBass's Avatar
CajunBass CajunBass is online now
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: North Chesterfield, Va.
Posts: 6,354
Likes: 9,062
Liked 13,578 Times in 3,345 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by venomballistics View Post
I'd agree 3.5 is a bit over the top for most fowl ... its a goose round anyhow ... but my my my what a tube full of goodness with buckshot
I would imagine a 3 1/2" load of Number 1 Buck would be some serious deer medicine.
__________________
John 3:16 .
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-07-2012, 09:53 PM
Sprefix's Avatar
Sprefix Sprefix is offline
US Veteran
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 61N149W
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 1,426
Liked 1,104 Times in 550 Posts
Default

If you HAVE TO go 3 1/2", then just get a 10 bore and be done with it. JMO...,And congrats on the many blessings in the pics. Life is Good!!!
__________________
Go big or stay home
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-07-2012, 11:39 PM
Cooter Brown Cooter Brown is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 1,315
Liked 1,832 Times in 701 Posts
Default

Fine job by daughter and father!

That's a bunch of good meals on the tailgate, and a fine looking dog.

The shotgun shell mania is kinda nuts. Remington has steel now at 1700 fps--of you do much research on shotgun pellet ballistics you realize that they have by far passed the point of diminishing returns and are just appealing to a crowd that can't see past speed.

When the load hurts the shooter as much as it hurts the bird, reevaluate.

May you and your daughter have many more days in the field and on the water together, and may she continue to take the boys to school--I'm sure she will!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-08-2012, 12:19 AM
m1gunner m1gunner is offline
US Veteran
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: middle Ga.
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 211
Liked 611 Times in 302 Posts
Default

Ever hunted Tundra Swan? The biggest steel shot and 3 1/2" shells are barely enough. And your retriever had better had a good breakfast that morning if he is going to drag those things back to the blind.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-08-2012, 12:37 AM
CAJUNLAWYER's Avatar
CAJUNLAWYER CAJUNLAWYER is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: On da Bayou Teche
Posts: 18,547
Likes: 18,801
Liked 59,469 Times in 9,750 Posts
Default

If I hunt Tundra Swan or Canadas, I'll use the 3.5's but I've killed more ducks with a 20 ga than a 12. I used to use a Browning 3" A-5 20 ga with lead when it was legal. Went to 12 gauge 2 3/4 steel and then went back to 20 gauge steel #3's in my Ruger O/U. Right now I'm shooting my SBEII with 3" just because I have a bunch of 12 ga.
To tell the truth, based on the number of them that I see on the shelves right before Duck season vs the lack of any on the shelves halfway through the duck season it would appear that the most popular duck load around here is the 12 gauge 3" double X turkey loads by Winchester in #6 or #4 shot. Always wondered why they stocked so much turkey loads in the fall down in the marsh when Turkey season isn't until the spring-and I ain't never seen no turkey in the marsh no

For decoying ducks all you need is a 20.
__________________
Forum consigliere
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-08-2012, 01:09 AM
35Rem's Avatar
35Rem 35Rem is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SE Alabama, near Dothan
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 772
Liked 791 Times in 365 Posts
Default

Cajun turkey say "quack quack".
__________________
War Eagle! '10 BCS & '13 SEC
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-08-2012, 01:53 AM
bushmaster1313's Avatar
bushmaster1313 bushmaster1313 is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PRNJ
Posts: 6,766
Likes: 477
Liked 16,853 Times in 3,329 Posts
Default

Quote:
.30-30 won't kill deer, the .357 Magnum won't work for personal defense,
Even I know that this just ain't so.
__________________
Buy American
Vote Responsibly
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-08-2012, 04:53 AM
moonclip's Avatar
moonclip moonclip is offline
Absent Comrade
You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 392
Likes: 64
Liked 30 Times in 15 Posts
Talking looks like he's thinking...



......moon
__________________
NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-08-2012, 11:17 PM
Cyrano's Avatar
Cyrano Cyrano is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,579
Likes: 13,500
Liked 6,743 Times in 2,526 Posts
Default

You guys make me envious; I sure wish I could hit something with a shotgun.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-09-2012, 03:40 PM
sipowicz's Avatar
sipowicz sipowicz is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gun lovin\' Hollywood Ca.
Posts: 10,234
Likes: 7,741
Liked 18,710 Times in 3,792 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tunachaser View Post

Okay...here she comes...if this don't impress that lil bitch, I'm giving up on women and going back to chasing cars...
__________________
Thirty characters. Exactly...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-09-2012, 08:11 PM
walnutred walnutred is offline
US Veteran
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,488
Likes: 829
Liked 3,116 Times in 1,027 Posts
Default

3.5" shell would be what, around 88mm? Kind of small by todays standards but the Germans were very effective with their 88mm shell, from what I've heard. Seems a bit much for ducks though.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-10-2012, 01:51 AM
bwickens bwickens is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Land of Lincoln
Posts: 202
Likes: 63
Liked 29 Times in 10 Posts
Default

So what 20 ga load did she use?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-10-2012, 11:30 AM
dmar dmar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 3,121
Liked 2,961 Times in 1,083 Posts
Default

I stick with the 3s, IMO those 3.5s are not necessary.

BTW, great pictures! Your kids look like they really enjoyed the day. Your daughter is a very pretty girl, nice to see her so accomplished in the outdoors. My daughter is just 2, but I'm hoping she grows up with an interest in the outdoors/shooting, as well... Great looking Lab you've got there, too, he had a big day!
__________________
NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-10-2012, 12:39 PM
NKJ nut's Avatar
NKJ nut NKJ nut is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 83
Liked 80 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAJUNLAWYER View Post
If I hunt Tundra Swan or Canadas, I'll use the 3.5's but I've killed more ducks with a 20 ga than a 12. I used to use a Browning 3" A-5 20 ga with lead when it was legal. Went to 12 gauge 2 3/4 steel and then went back to 20 gauge steel #3's in my Ruger O/U. Right now I'm shooting my SBEII with 3" just because I have a bunch of 12 ga.
To tell the truth, based on the number of them that I see on the shelves right before Duck season vs the lack of any on the shelves halfway through the duck season it would appear that the most popular duck load around here is the 12 gauge 3" double X turkey loads by Winchester in #6 or #4 shot. Always wondered why they stocked so much turkey loads in the fall down in the marsh when Turkey season isn't until the spring-and I ain't never seen no turkey in the marsh no

For decoying ducks all you need is a 20.
Back when lead shot was legal I used 2 3/4" no. 5 heavy loads for ducks just like I did for everything else. It worked fine.

Later after i got in the business of selling I noticed a big demand for lead shot turkey loads around duck season. More so actually than during turkey season. I assume if a guy pulls up with a boat load of duck decoys and wearing camo and wanting to buy lead shot turkey loads; he's probably going coyote hunting.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-10-2012, 01:07 PM
novalty's Avatar
novalty novalty is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 13,611
Likes: 491
Liked 1,883 Times in 987 Posts
Default

Great pics.
Nice truck.
Happy eating!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-14-2012, 11:40 PM
John Eilertson John Eilertson is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 412
Likes: 31
Liked 35 Times in 28 Posts
Default

Nicely done. My SG is chambered 3 1/2", but I feel my best with 3" 4s. The extra 1/2" might matter in long range pass shooting, goose hunting or in finishing cripples, but is not really needed over decoys. I could show loads of dead examples of that. Three and one half inch shells are mostly a costly way to do not really any more than a 2 3/4 or 3" shell can do. More recoil certainly doesn't mean more efficiency.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-15-2012, 12:26 AM
Class III Class III is offline
Member
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 891
Liked 734 Times in 300 Posts
Default

3.5" shells do have there place. But, that place is not in a shotgun mounted to MY shoulder. Most of these were taken with 2.75" #4 steel in Canada a few years ago. They were taken in a cut barley field with the barley piled in windrows shooting over about 500 socks and 200 field shells.

Class III
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Canada 019.jpg (111.7 KB, 33 views)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-26-2012, 07:42 PM
Tunachaser's Avatar
Tunachaser Tunachaser is offline
US Veteran
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Charleston,SC
Posts: 510
Likes: 34
Liked 238 Times in 68 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sipowicz View Post
Okay...here she comes...if this don't impress that lil bitch, I'm giving up on women and going back to chasing cars...
Best one yet, that was funny.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 01-26-2012, 07:50 PM
Tunachaser's Avatar
Tunachaser Tunachaser is offline
US Veteran
You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells You do not need 3.5" shells  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Charleston,SC
Posts: 510
Likes: 34
Liked 238 Times in 68 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bwickens View Post
So what 20 ga load did she use?
mostly 3" Blackclouds, some Win. Blindside. I would say roughly 80% one shot kills unless she missed which to the best of our knowledge was only once, keep in mind these were deacoying ducks 20 - 50 yards at most. She now shoots better than I do...........
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
357 magnum, benelli, beretta, browning, model 60, remington, ruger, winchester


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wtb 22 shells Ruttinhard WANTED to Buy 1 10-21-2013 10:55 PM
How do you convert a MEC Grabber to reload 2-1/2" Shells? jdickson397 Reloading 10 06-29-2013 09:33 AM
Ejector: Shells flying "too far" mudnamer Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 17 03-18-2013 01:16 PM
Biden: "So You Want to Keep People Away in an Earthquake: Buy Some Shotgun Shells' 2hawk 2nd Amendment Forum 46 01-31-2013 11:31 AM
WTS "Vintage" Win 20-Ga Shot shells Federalis Accessories/Misc - For Sale or Trade 1 05-08-2011 09:35 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)