|
|
01-31-2012, 02:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central OK
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 610
Liked 420 Times in 263 Posts
|
|
Recommendations on Spotting Scopes
I'm not sure where this thread should be posted, so I'll try here and see where it goes.
I was helping a buddy sight in his newly scoped .22 rifle and ended up using a pair of binoculars to spot his hits on the target. The thought occurred to me that the process would probably be easier if I had a good spotting scope.
So... what's a good spotting scope that won't break the bank? Target distances will most likely be less than 200 yards.
I appreciate any and all comments.
Blessings,
Hog
__________________
Isaiah 55:8-9
Phil. 4:13
|
01-31-2012, 03:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,823
Likes: 1,256
Liked 630 Times in 357 Posts
|
|
My local range rents some very cheap spotters of 20x, which are adequate to see .223 holes at 100 yards. I wouldn't care to spend much time looking through these scopes, but for a quick glance at a target, they're OK. I'd guess they cost no more than $100.
|
01-31-2012, 03:48 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 192
Liked 1,112 Times in 558 Posts
|
|
Take a look at the Bushnell Spacemaster. Just good enough to see .22 holes at 200 yards. Clear as a bell at 100 yards. You can also get a "T" mount adapter to use this as a camera lens if you have a single lens reflex camera.
|
01-31-2012, 04:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Starkville, MS
Posts: 912
Likes: 135
Liked 233 Times in 106 Posts
|
|
No on Tasco
Pretty horrible optics. As with most things, you get what you pay for. I upgraded to a Kowa and while it has some slight chromatic aberration (color fringing) at 60x, I did not get the best one of the series. It serves my needs.
|
02-01-2012, 12:04 AM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 7,579
Likes: 13,500
Liked 6,743 Times in 2,526 Posts
|
|
I had the second line Bushnell (forget the name) for about 20 years. It was excellent as a spotting scope.
|
02-01-2012, 12:22 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central OK
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 610
Liked 420 Times in 263 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the comments. So far it looks like l need to check the Bushnell and Kowa lines of spotting scopes. Anything else l need to look at? I know there are a range of values in any product line, so any suggestions are most appreciated.
__________________
Isaiah 55:8-9
Phil. 4:13
|
02-01-2012, 12:36 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,823
Likes: 1,256
Liked 630 Times in 357 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OK Hog Shooter
Thanks for the comments. So far it looks like l need to check the Bushnell and Kowa lines of spotting scopes. Anything else l need to look at? I know there are a range of values in any product line, so any suggestions are most appreciated.
|
If you want to sort the "also-rans" from the "shooters" among Coues whitetails at a mile or more, or etc., you'll want a scope that costs as much as a used 4x4 with some life left in it. But, you only need sufficient resolution to see .22 holes in paper, aren't going to give the scope hard knocks or other abusive treatment, or spend hours on end looking through it. This is the rare case when an inexpensive optic meets the "'at'll do it" threshold. Buy a cheap scope of 20x or more, and spend the money you will have saved on another indulgence...
|
02-01-2012, 12:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central OK
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 610
Liked 420 Times in 263 Posts
|
|
I well know that any optic that has high quality lenses, generally speaking, has an associated price tag that would choke most of us. To get back to my basic queston, up to 200 yards, (cause that's about as far as I can get an open shooting lane on my "farm", which is fairly heavily timbered), are there any of the more affordable brands I should avoid?
Thanks for the replies, too!
__________________
Isaiah 55:8-9
Phil. 4:13
|
02-01-2012, 01:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 602
Likes: 765
Liked 403 Times in 119 Posts
|
|
I got a Konus 80mm a couple of years ago, and it is real clear and about $200. I also got a Burris 60mm to replace a stolen older bushnell. I like it too. The larger Konus is popular with HP rifle shooters on a budget.
|
02-01-2012, 07:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 6
Liked 351 Times in 243 Posts
|
|
I used a Simmons 2-60X60mm. It was tolerable although as most cheaper scopes it had a tendency to get blurry at higher magnifications and had a smallish exit pupil. It worked alright at 100 yards but it was way too big and it didn't have a case, which meant lugging the box around every time I went to the range.
Then, a couple years ago I saw a Barska spotting scope go on sale at Natchez for about $100. It is a 25-125X with an 88mm objective. I love it. I haven't had a chance to take it shooting yet, but it is great to look out into our woods, about 75 yards min., to look at birds or to study the moon with the grand daughter. It is not quite as big as the Simmons was, came with a hard side case, table tripod and pistol grip.
|
02-01-2012, 09:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Way Up North - MI
Posts: 641
Likes: 138
Liked 415 Times in 186 Posts
|
|
I will admit I am an optics snob, but you really seem to get what you pay for up to a point. I picked up a Kowa spotting scope from an estate sale several years ago, and found it to perform very well, when used side by side with the Swarovski I won about 10 years ago at a wild game dinner (Its true once you go with high end glass its hard to go back). The Kowa's are listed on SWFA's website in the $400 to $500 range (which is a big jump from $100) but if you are even thinking of using your scope for hunting, it is worth the extra expense. Final thought, the tripod matters, better to put a lesser scope on a good tripod then a expensive scope on a cheap base.
__________________
always trust your cape...
|
02-01-2012, 11:42 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,939
Likes: 4,106
Liked 2,582 Times in 1,106 Posts
|
|
Scopes to avoid? I hate to put down Leopold but at least some of their line are not worthy of the name.
Celestron makes a good line of scopes that more or less bridge the gap between low and high end scopes. Their zoom eye piece is as good or better than some fixed power eye pieces I've tried.
__________________
Regards, Ron
USASA 1965/69
|
02-02-2012, 02:21 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,984
Likes: 7,977
Liked 26,233 Times in 8,828 Posts
|
|
I inherited a Tasco spotting scope years ago, and can say "it's a Junker". It works, but quite poorly.
|
02-02-2012, 02:47 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MURFREESBORO TN.
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 90
Liked 402 Times in 177 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonJ
Scopes to avoid? I hate to put down Leopold but at least some of their line are not worthy of the name.
Celestron makes a good line of scopes that more or less bridge the gap between low and high end scopes. Their zoom eye piece is as good or better than some fixed power eye pieces I've tried.
|
+1 one the Celestron. I just bought one about two weeks ago and it seems to be a good scope. A lot of seeing 22 holes at 100 and 200 yards is the color of your target. Shooting into a black bullseye with a dark back ground puts a scope to a real test. Another thing to think about is to buy a rifle scope that will see your 22 holes. I have a Weaver T36 on an Anschutz 22LR that I can see 22 holes at 200 yards. Don
__________________
"Don't worry be happy"
|
02-02-2012, 10:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indiana USA
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 3
Liked 211 Times in 111 Posts
|
|
I have had many different spotting scopes over the years, some that have been satisfactory are Bushnell, Swift, Leupold Golden Ring (not the green ring junk), and Bausch & Lomb SR. Stay away from any of the Chinese stuff, you want 30X magnification (less will not let you clearly see small caliber bullet holes especially @200yds.). I have a B&L 30X presently and have always found these to be satisfactory. They have been out of production for several years but are easy to find on the secondary market and will not break the bank to purchase.
|
02-02-2012, 04:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Central OK
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 610
Liked 420 Times in 263 Posts
|
|
Thanks to all who have contributed. Now it's time to start looking in some of the local sporting goods stores for some hands on and then make a decision!
__________________
Isaiah 55:8-9
Phil. 4:13
|
02-02-2012, 09:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Central KY
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 13
Liked 196 Times in 94 Posts
|
|
I would suggest shopping the fourms classifieds for used item.
For example, a common thing is an 'obsolete' Leupold 25x50 fixed powder with some surface finish wear for little more than a new bargain scope.
As said earlier, if occasional range use is all it is for, most anything will work. Just don't expect to glass with such for an extended period, unless you like headaches.
__________________
Incoming fire has right of way
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|