I watched, "A Bridge Too Far" again last night and was again miffed to see AT-6's dropping bombs on German troops opposing the advance of Lt. Gen. Sir Brian Horrocks's XXX Corps. (An armored column spearheaded by the Irish Guards.) I wanted to see P-47's or Typhoons doing that. But I guess the movie producers couldn't get any, nor Mustangs.
The AT-6 was a trainer, but I think some were furnished to South Vietnam as fighter-bombers. Or I may just be recalling the T-28's so used. They fitted them with a couple of .50's in the wings in that role.
Anyone know if any AT-6's were used that way?
Oh: a more satisfactory aircraft in that movie was a Spitfire that made recon runs that should have detected German tanks. Probably did, although the British commander didn't want to believe a shrewd intelligence officer, as it'd have caused a change of plans and upset that prima donna, Lord Montgomery. So we had the disaster at Arnhem...
I think the Spitfire was a MK IX. It definitely had the double radiators under the wings, which the pilot waggled at a Dutch schoolboy who waved at him.
If you haven't seen this DVD, rent it. It's a superb film, other than subbing AT-6's for Typhoons. Has a massive all-star cast, British, US, and German actors. At least, they painted the AT-6's right.
BTW, when I was a boy, I got to climb inside a B-25 at Abilene AFB. I had aleady read Ted Lawson's, "Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo" and was surprised to see how cramped it was inside that medium bomber. Later, a member of the Thunderbirds let me sit in the cockpit of his F-84F. They probably don't allow that now. And the few B-25's still in service then were soon phased out. I think they were mainly just used as transports for generals who were nostalgic about the old bird.
OH: does anyone know why trainers were painted bright orange? Was it a warning to others that a student pilot might be at the controls?