My Own Jack O'Conner Tribute Gun-Now with SK Mounts and Rings

Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Messages
6,851
Reaction score
17,155
Location
PRNJ
A Jack O'Conner tribute Winchester Model 70 was auctioned off by Shot Show for upwards of $15,000:

Special LImited Edition Jack O'Connor Tribute Model 70 auctioned at the SHOT SHOW. - Winchester Repeating Arms Article


Here is a picture from the Winchester site:

jack-o-connor-right-side-2fullright.jpg


Here is a link to the Jack O'Conner Center:

Welcome to the Jack O'Connor® Center



My 1958 Winchester Model 70 in .270 Winchester:

cimg0530u.jpg



The scope is now mounted:

CIMG1456_zps92fb85fc.jpg



CIMG1433_zpse96af34c.jpg


CIMG1446_zpsc73a7218.jpg


CIMG1451_zpsb3bf9c13.jpg


On this rifle, a Mountaineer 4X is like a set of Cokes on a 5 Screw N Frame.

Mr. O'Conner mounted his Mountaineer with Tilden rings.
I have Buehler bases -- and I am looking for the right rings.

Now with SK Mounts and Rings:

CIMG1470_zpsf5a39732.jpg


CIMG1479_zps46351dab.jpg


CIMG1473_zps9065a0e1.jpg


So much nicer than the Weaver Grand Slams on the Weaver bases:

CIMG1451_zpsb3bf9c13.jpg
 
Last edited:
I never actually met Jack, but we corresponded for at least 20 years and I've kept some of his letters. I think he was the most sage rifle and hunting guru of his day, although Warren Page was a little more flamboyant. Jim Carmichel probably knows more in a technical sense, but Jack had a wonderfully droll wit that endeared his prose to many of us.

He was almost single-handedly responsible for the re-emergence of the classic stock on factory rifles, eclipsing the Weatherby influence that had dominated the stock market, not always well rendered. Generally, when gunmakers varied from the original Weatherby lines, they messed up. It's easy to achieve overkill when designing rifle stocks.

Thanks for posting about this. i hadn't seen it. The rifle does reflect Jack's taste, and I hope a standard version becomes a fixture in their line. The current M-70, especially in Super Grade, is a nice rifle. The Fwt. version is also just really nice, perhaps the finest hunting rifle that Winchester has made. Mine is a .270, something that Jack O'Connor would have heartily approved! Some seem to think that he advocated the .270 for anything and everything, but he had .338, .375, and .416 rifles, too, and used them when advisable. And he was also fond of the 7X57mm and the .30/06. Tried the 7mm Rem. Magnum and had a nice custom rifle made to shoot it, but said it didn't really kill better than his .270's.

Jack used Al Biesen as his stock maker and he was good. I sort of prefer the lines of Dale Goens and a few other classic stockers, but that general style is, I feel, the best. The stocks handle well and look good in a timeless, classic sense.

It may be useful to note that Jack went to the then-new .270 in part because 7X57mm barrels were throated to take the long 175 grain bullets. When used primarily with 139-140 grain bullets, the barrel throat showed erosion sooner than did the .270 throats. Nonetheless, he ordered the last 7X57mm M-70 built and was overjoyed to see it while he was recovering from a car accident. And his wife Eleanor used the 7mm on about everything short of tigers. She felt a need for a more powerful rifle for those, so used a .30/06! (Jack used a .375 for tigers.) Jim Corbett also used the 7mm (.275 Rigby) on man-eating tigers when he had to walk long distances and didn't want to lug the weight of his .400 or .450 rifles.

Sorry to ramble. I think it was very wise and kind of Winchester to offer this O'Connor tribute rifle. Jack was a major fan of the M-70 and of their .270 ctg. I feel sure that he sold a lot of rifles for Winchester and helped to make the .270 a best selling cartridge. He was also one of the most honest gun writers. If he plugged a product, he believed in it. And his writing made many hunters aware of the need for fine binoculars in a day when many thought they were too expensive. He even wrote a promotional booklet for Bausch & Lomb, although he also used Leitz/Leica and Zeiss products. I remember him saying that looking through a Zeiss 8X50B was like looking out a picture window and beholding wonderful panoramas.

It was John Wootters who said that using a binocular in the autumn woods gave him almost a psychedelic high, but it was Jack O'Connor who first made me aware of fine optics.

He was the ONLY gun writer who received obituary notices in the mainstream media, probably because he once headed the Journalism program at AZ State U. He died in 1978, at the age of 76.

I've heard that he could be a little abrasive but he always treated me well and tolerated my questions. He was a giant of his kind, and I miss him.
 
Last edited:
What would be the period correct base and rings?

Sir, FWIW, my grandpa's 1951 standard grade Model 70 (.270) is set up with a Weaver KV scope on Weaver bases and rings. I would expect a gun fit with a Leupold scope to also use Leupold rings and bases, assuming they were available then.

Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.

Ron H.
 
Last edited:
Sir, FWIW, my grandpa's 1951 standard grade Model 70 (.270) is set up with a Weaver KV scope on Weaver bases and rings. I would expect a gun fit with a Leupold scope to also use Leupold rings and bases, assuming they were available then.

Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.

Ron H.

Here's a period mount for the M70 pre-64. It's a Redfield steel "Jr" one-piece base with Redfield split steel rings. Still a good mount. Scope is an older Lyman 4X on a '49 M70 in .30-06.

DSC_1512.jpg
 
Here's a period mount for the M70 pre-64. It's a Redfield steel "Jr" one-piece base with Redfield split steel rings. Still a good mount. Scope is an older Lyman 4X on a '49 M70 in .30-06.

DSC_1512.jpg

Is that a short action mount on a long action receiver?
 
No. Most all the one-piece (Leupold, Redfield, etc) mounts only use the one rear scope mounting screw to secure the rear part of the base. On the M70 it looks a little strange at first, like part of the rear mount was cut off, but it works fine. The pre-64 M70 Winchester only came in a long action.
Bob
 
Last edited:
Jack O'Connor once wrote that he had the first M70 in .270 Winchester east of the Mississippi and took it to a hunting camp in Northern Arizona. He also said that Clark Gable was at the camp as well. Jack O'Connor said his M70/.270 garnered more attention than the movie star did.

I came west and had no one to teach me how to hunt. But Jack O'Connor did. Every single gun writer extant then (1977) had nothing in print about how to really seriously hunt western game, except Jack O'Connor. I eventually owned every hunting book he wrote except "Sheep and Sheep Hunting" or whatever the title was. It was THEN a rare and expensive collectible and considered the "bible" of sheep hunters.

He had been a hunter, without guide services long before he became a hunting writer. Many of his later contemporaries and their writings left me with the impression that they could shoot but they couldn't have found anything in the woods without a guide.

As such I am still a "classic stock" user. I think the "Monte Carlo" occurred because the early bolt-actions needed a cheek-piece to accommodate the new-fangled scoped sights. The classic design just put everything in its right place from the get-go.

I too hope Winchester makes this "Mountaineer" a stocked item.
 
Back
Top