I've read many discussions about the pros and cons of having a round chambered in a semi-automatic. I'd say the majority think it is best to have a round chambered, since in a moment of high stress/need, it may be too difficult to rack the slide and load a round, or it may be too time consuming. On the other hand, I have read many comments that the sound of a pump shotgun being pumped is (in the opinions of many, it would seem) enough all by itself to deter a bad guy. Now, if you are going to pump the action, it would seem to me that you would be doing so to chamber a shell...unless you just want to eject the shell that is in the chamber, perhaps as a warning to the bad guy. That seems unlikely, so it would seem that most who advocate the sound of a pump shotgun being pumped as an effective deterrent don't have a shell already in the chamber.
So, I was wondering, why is it generally considered advisable to have a round chambered in a semi-automatic pistol, but apparently it's preferable not to have a shell chambered in a pump shotgun? Is that because the action of a pump shotgun is considered to be easier to manipulate under stress than would be racking the slide on a semi-automatic?
So, I was wondering, why is it generally considered advisable to have a round chambered in a semi-automatic pistol, but apparently it's preferable not to have a shell chambered in a pump shotgun? Is that because the action of a pump shotgun is considered to be easier to manipulate under stress than would be racking the slide on a semi-automatic?