|
 |

04-07-2013, 09:58 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
Question for Pontiac Engine Guys
I'm going to be building a 400 Pontiac engine......I already have the block, crank, rods, carb and manifold. What I don't have are the heads. I'm not going to buy the Edlebrock or Kaufman heads but rather will be sticking with Pontiac heads. Question is, which heads to stay around 9.5:1 compression ratio?
I've heard that other than the Ram Air heads, which I don't want t spend the money on, the ultimate pontiac heads are the 670 heads. Unaltered, they would have me up around 10:1 or 10.5:1.
Is there any advantage to me spending more money and going with 670 heads and dished pistons to lower the compression ratio or should I just get heads that have the big valves but a little bit larger chamber size? I can get a set of 96 heads with the bigger combustion chambers for $300.00.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-07-2013, 10:16 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,615 Times in 885 Posts
|
|
Not a Pontiac expert , but I've built more than a few Chevy motors. If ya go with big cubes , 400 or over , stay at 9.5:1 or lower. Gas quality is only gonna get worse and with the old combustion chamber shape , detonation or pinging is gonna happen. Dished pistons allow good flame travel.
Be sure to pick your cam accordingly too. Hi lift , short duration seems to be the pick for street use today.
Ignition system is also something to consider. An MSD unit is probably the way to go. There's probably even better units out today. The old vacuum and centrifugal advance points distributor , while reliable , just don't cut it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-07-2013, 01:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: western north carolina
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Liked 166 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
670s will probably be a tad more compression than you want. i'd look for 48 (possibly pricey!), or the secret hidden gem 62. i used to drag race strictly pontiacs, and used the 62 exclusively for nitrous motors. i honestly never saw any measurable difference in them and the 48. the 670 is a great head, too. if you have them, i'd probably go with them, if you can deal with the c/r.
good luck, and post pics!
ed
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-07-2013, 02:05 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: OVER the hill in TEJAS
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 13,107
Liked 4,340 Times in 1,773 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaximumLawman
I'm going to be building a 400 Pontiac engine......I already have the block, crank, rods, carb and manifold. What I don't have are the heads. I'm not going to buy the Edlebrock or Kaufman heads but rather will be sticking with Pontiac heads. Question is, which heads to stay around 9.5:1 compression ratio?
I've heard that other than the Ram Air heads, which I don't want t spend the money on, the ultimate pontiac heads are the 670 heads. Unaltered, they would have me up around 10:1 or 10.5:1.
Is there any advantage to me spending more money and going with 670 heads and dished pistons to lower the compression ratio or should I just get heads that have the big valves but a little bit larger chamber size? I can get a set of 96 heads with the bigger combustion chambers for $300.00.
|
I have a set that came off of my friends 70 GTO. I will see if he will sell if you wont. Shipping sucks. Last set was $135.These are stamped 12.
Last edited by 4barrel; 04-16-2013 at 11:43 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-07-2013, 02:44 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,257
Likes: 16,095
Liked 10,756 Times in 4,264 Posts
|
|
Compression ratio will be impacted by piston shape, head gasket thickness, etc. I would get a head that has good combustion chamber shape and decent flow at lower RPMs (consistent with the cam grind described above), which would be consistent with most street use; a good quality mid-sized carb, probably not more than 650 CFM (unless you are going with FI), get the heads into good shape, and tweak the CR one you have all the right parts. As noted, gas quality is not likely to get better, and a lower CR is probably going to be a better choice for most uses.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

04-07-2013, 04:43 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
AR: the 670's will absolutely be too high with flat pistons. I'd like to know if there is any advantage to the 670 set up if I dish the pistons to lower compression or if I should just go with heads that already have a bigger chamber. I think the 670's are 72cc's and others that also have the big valves are 88....Do the 670's flow better than other heads, for example?
Doug: I plan on going with the original quadrajet and manifold.
I can get 6x head cheap but those are big chambers and more along the lines of a 455 stroker and I'm considering going with the 400 just because I have the block and crank, etc...
AR: Looks like the 62 and 48 heads are both set up to make 10.5:1 CR without dished pistons. I think I may be better off going with a bigger chamber to start???:
Cylinder Heads
Last edited by MaximumLawman; 04-07-2013 at 04:50 PM.
|

04-07-2013, 04:56 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Back in Northern NJ
Posts: 886
Likes: 913
Liked 867 Times in 353 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaximumLawman
I'm going to be building a 400 Pontiac engine......I already have the block, crank, rods, carb and manifold. What I don't have are the heads. I'm not going to buy the Edlebrock or Kaufman heads but rather will be sticking with Pontiac heads. Question is, which heads to stay around 9.5:1 compression ratio?
I've heard that other than the Ram Air heads, which I don't want t spend the money on, the ultimate pontiac heads are the 670 heads. Unaltered, they would have me up around 10:1 or 10.5:1.
Is there any advantage to me spending more money and going with 670 heads and dished pistons to lower the compression ratio or should I just get heads that have the big valves but a little bit larger chamber size? I can get a set of 96 heads with the bigger combustion chambers for $300.00.
|
While I can't help you with your heads question, I CAN help you with a tripower setup from a 1966 GTO. Mechanical linkage. Three bitty air cleaners. Gooseneck thermostat housing. I sold my last Pontiac 25 years ago so that's how long this rebuild has been sitting in storage. I wanted to make a coffee table out of it with a glass top but my wife doesn't think it's a good idea...
__________________
NICK-SWCA-NRA BENEFACTOR LIFE
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-07-2013, 05:17 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

04-07-2013, 05:47 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,358 Times in 5,550 Posts
|
|
I didn't go with the normal engine build when I built my big block 396 with 325hp. I used a two bolt main block with the 9.5 stock positions. I had cut the oval port heads .010" to make sure they were flat. I installed the complete 375 hp valve train along with the solid lifter oil pump. I ported and matched the ports myself. I did cut and snitch the block were the exhaust valve is so it can flow better than with the square edge. I went with the electrical 180 degree intake with a 780 Holley carb stagger jetted to the big block book. With a 1" carb spacer under them carb. Then i installed the oil pan windage tray and the oil baffle to keep the hot oil off the bottom of the intake manifold.
Proper tuning is the key. I took the point distributor and removed the brass bushing that limits the rotors advance. Then I put in the heavy weights with the lightest springs. Using the vacumne hose on the carb for advancing the distributor I adjusted the idle timing till I got 50 degrees of total advance @ 2,000rpm. With the accel points, gapped at .017" and the champion spark plugs gapped at .032"'.
I installed it in a 63 s/s impala with a super t 10 4 speed and 4:88 in the rear. At the strip she ran 12.85 the first time out. I even forgot to turn on the electric fuel pump so she couldn't rev past 5,000 rpm and she still ran in the 12s... on the full body car dune I had 299hp at 6,800 rpm and about 400hp under the hood that's not too shabby for a 325hp stock engine with the small port heads.
Note; I went thru the traps at 3,500rpm so if I had 5:38s in the rear and wired my electric fuel pump to the ign key she would of broke into the 11 seconds no problem. But my older brother who love fast cars
Haunted me to sell it before I got hurt in it I guess he was right.
We also built a pontiac 400 ci by installing a ram air cam I it. It was in a 64 gto convertible. We won lots of $$ drag racing this sleeper too.
It had 4:30s in the rear with a 400th tranny.
But it's all in the proper tuning and big blocks love a lot of total timing. Setting it at 50 degrees seems to be it's sweet spot with any big bore engine. Bigbill
Btw; I suggest cutting the heads .010" to make sure there flat and tune it correctly.
I do regret missing my calling as an engine builder and tuner but I did get to build dirkbike engines.
Last edited by BigBill; 04-07-2013 at 06:02 PM.
|

04-07-2013, 06:03 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
Thanks Bill..
|

04-07-2013, 06:07 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,358 Times in 5,550 Posts
|
|
You know that cubic inches is cubic inches so any big bore block will respond to proper tuning. Just stay tuning and adjusting it till it's right. That's the fun of doing it.
|

04-07-2013, 07:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southeast Kansas
Posts: 263
Likes: 506
Liked 134 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
MaximumLawman--I`m guessing you`ve been on Performance Years website. Everything you would ever want to know about Pontiac engines has been discussed there. A good reference book is "How to Build Max-Performance Pontiac V-8s, by Jim Hand. In the back of it there`s recipies for mild to wild.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-07-2013, 07:52 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
Hey DH, I'm reading the Hands book now and am looking at Chapter 11 with various build "recipes". I've heard of the Central Virginia Machine Service on several pontiac forums and they come highly recommended. I'm leaning toward 96 heads, I think, OR buying THIS bad boy if the prices to do my 400 is close...This guy is an easy drive from my house....maybe he'd knock $400.00 off if I picked it up....
http://www.ebay.com/itm/160998552824...84.m1423.l2649
If I go with my current block, I have to decide if I want to be strokin' or not.....The Eagle stroker rotating assembly is about $1500.00 and would work with the relatively inexpensive 6x heads......And 461 does sound cooler than 400....
Last edited by MaximumLawman; 04-07-2013 at 08:34 PM.
|

04-07-2013, 08:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southeast Kansas
Posts: 263
Likes: 506
Liked 134 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
That combination from "Jeff" is almost identical to one I put together about 6 years ago, except my cam was a lot more radical. Still idled good and had enough vacuum for power brakes though. It was the 1st engine I`d done in 20 years and it came out really well. Went into a 68 Firebird with a reworked THM-400. It always pulled like a freight train all the way through the rpm range. That looks like a good combination he has there.
|

04-07-2013, 08:58 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
DH, specifically which one are you referring to? Recipe "A" from Virginia machine with the 400 block and stroked crank and 6x heads? The very first one in the series of builds? .....and who is "Jeff"??
Last edited by MaximumLawman; 04-07-2013 at 09:01 PM.
|

04-07-2013, 09:01 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 638
Liked 462 Times in 271 Posts
|
|
I had a 69 GTO with a 400 and 2 4 barrels back in 1978. Paid 750.00 for the car, got married in 78, blew the motor in 79, put a 389 in it and sold it for 200.00! When the carbs were set up right and the progressive linkage was working correctly it was pretty fast!
|

04-07-2013, 09:03 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
Hmm, "when the carbs were set up right" indeed.....That's why I'm leaning toward one carb....That's enough for me to try to figure out, let alone three of them....
|

04-07-2013, 09:09 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,484
Likes: 9,750
Liked 6,671 Times in 2,315 Posts
|
|
Is that a 64 or 65 Tempest body?
|

04-07-2013, 09:14 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralph7
Is that a 64 or 65 Tempest body?
|
'65 GTO. Post (sedan) body.
|

04-07-2013, 09:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southeast Kansas
Posts: 263
Likes: 506
Liked 134 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaximumLawman
DH, specifically which one are you referring to? Recipe "A" from Virginia machine with the 400 block and stroked crank and 6x heads? The very first one in the series of builds? .....and who is "Jeff"??
|
The e-barf ad.
|

04-07-2013, 09:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southeast Kansas
Posts: 263
Likes: 506
Liked 134 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaximumLawman
Hmm, "when the carbs were set up right" indeed.....That's why I'm leaning toward one carb....That's enough for me to try to figure out, let alone three of them....
|
Nothing equals the sound of a Tri-Power opening up. And nothing equals the gas guage needle falling toward empty too.
|

04-07-2013, 09:59 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,484
Likes: 9,750
Liked 6,671 Times in 2,315 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaximumLawman
'65 GTO. Post (sedan) body.
|
Best year for the Goat, IMHO.
|

04-07-2013, 10:04 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,358 Times in 5,550 Posts
|
|
My buddy had an altered with a big block Chevy running the Hilborn injection. It would constantly run in the high nine seconds in the quarter mile using the fuel injection Chevy cam and valve train. He picked up a new Howard a cam setup and it went only in the mid ten seconds. He reinstalled the Chevy cam and she was back to the high nines again. My point is the original equipment high performance factory stuff can be better engineered for performance. We do degree the cam to the original specs. Some gains can be made by advancing or regarding the cam too. Having the engine tested and run on an engine dune is one way to get results ahead of time. Just one more food for thought. Bb
For today's gas prices a single 780 Holley with vaccumne secondarys would be ok. Years ago we would install a screw and nut in the slot for secondarys before we raced. This is about the best gas mileage you can get.
Last edited by BigBill; 04-07-2013 at 10:09 PM.
|

04-07-2013, 10:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 735
Likes: 2,214
Liked 354 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
Those #96 heads were 8.2:1 on '71 400s. Milling them some may give you the ideal CR. I don't know about the lower compression years ('71+), but the earlier years actually had ~0.5 less CR than advertised. 10.25:1 was closer to 9.75:1.
Those #96s used to be popular for boosting CR on 455s.
|

04-07-2013, 11:49 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhallz71
The e-barf ad.
|
Ah, thanks. I never noticed the guy's name. He actually used the machine shop where I was considering having my 400 block built. Glad to hear a similar combo worked well for you. His motor seemed a little pricey but by the time I get done buying parts and paying the machine shop to make one of those engines from the Hands book....
Quote:
Those #96 heads were 8.2:1 on '71 400s. Milling them some may give you the ideal CR. I don't know about the lower compression years ('71+), but the earlier years actually had ~0.5 less CR than advertised. 10.25:1 was closer to 9.75:1.
Those #96s used to be popular for boosting CR on 455s.
|
I think the 96 heads would be good on my 400 block but if I went with a stroker crank it might be well over 9.5. Those 6x heads that they like to use on the 461's are over 100 cc's, I think. But DH was right, there were some good combos suggested in the Hands book. I didn't look at that chapter until he mentioned it. I'm going to call a couple of those builders for a price too.
Quote:
My point is the original equipment high performance factory stuff can be better engineered for performance. We do degree the cam to the original specs. Some gains can be made by advancing or regarding the cam too. Having the engine tested and run on an engine dune is one way to get results ahead of time. Just one more food for thought. Bb
For today's gas prices a single 780 Holley with vaccumne secondarys would be ok. Years ago we would install a screw and nut in the slot for secondarys before we raced. This is about the best gas mileage you can get.
|
I've heard from quite a few guys (and in the Jim Hands book) that the original equipment intake manifold is hard to beat. Lots of guys put on an Edlebrock and actually lose performance. I have a 650 double pumper holly with mechanical secondaries laying around. I could always try that one too.
Quote:
Best year for the Goat, IMHO.
|
It's gonna be Torch Red when I get it done....The original Montero Red was a little too dark for me.
Last edited by MaximumLawman; 04-07-2013 at 11:59 PM.
|

04-08-2013, 05:19 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 1,697
Liked 1,284 Times in 640 Posts
|
|
"The only thing that beats cubic inches is cubic money", a old mechanic once told me, "so how many dollars worth of fast do you want to go"
|

04-08-2013, 08:34 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: WI
Posts: 593
Likes: 657
Liked 772 Times in 194 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by silentflyer
"The only thing that beats cubic inches is cubic money", a old mechanic once told me, "so how many dollars worth of fast do you want to go"
|
Very true, and Pontiacs always costed somewhat more than a Ford or Chevy. Actually anything BOP was pricey but well worth it. Never cared for swapping powerplants because your small block Chevy was cheaper. jmo.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

04-08-2013, 10:03 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
Lots of people have told me I should just stick a chevy motor in there since the car's not going to be original anyway. Blasphemy!
How about headers? I've heard that Doug's or Headman are the best for Pontiac but I also understand that any header install on a Pontiac is a biotch. Any suggestions? Will I have to dismantle tie rods and such to squeeze headers in there? And what about mufflers? I want a loud, low rumble. Flowmasters?
|

04-08-2013, 11:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southeast Kansas
Posts: 263
Likes: 506
Liked 134 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
Doug`s are probably the best. With Hedman and Hookers, you have to dimple the #2 tube on the right side to clear the upper control arm. Unless you want to notch the arm a little. Yes, they`re a pain in any case.
|

04-09-2013, 12:22 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: zy
Posts: 876
Likes: 15
Liked 381 Times in 216 Posts
|
|
The Hands book shows some "shorty" headers that look sort of like the factory cast headers as opposed to the long-tube ones...Heard anything about them??? You think it's best to install headers on the motor and drop it in or after the motor's already in?
Last edited by MaximumLawman; 04-09-2013 at 12:26 AM.
|

04-09-2013, 01:11 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Ga
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 428
Liked 454 Times in 235 Posts
|
|
Maximum
I don't know if you have heard of these guys or contacted them. I am not a Pontiac guy, but have heard good things from Butler Performance they are the Pontiac Guru's.
Hope they may be able to answer some of your questions.
Butler Performance-Pontiac Engine Masters Challenge
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|