How a WWII Japanese sub commander helped exonerate a U.S. Navy captain

Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
6,931
Reaction score
21,211
Location
Pacific North-Wet
I'd read about the sinking of the Indianapolis, but didn't know about this. Article here.

imrs.php

Mochitsura Hashimoto, center, former Japanese sub commander, testifies at the Dec. 13, 1945, session of the Navy court-martial in Washington, trying Capt. Charles B. McVay III. (Byron Rollins/AP/AP)

"...Initially, Navy prosecutors tried to charge McVay with two counts of negligence: “failure to abandon ship in a timely manner” and “hazarding his ship” by failing to steer her in diagonal lines, a since-abandoned defensive maneuver known as zigzagging.

But the prosecutors soon realized they could not prove the first charge because the ship sank so quickly. So they put all their effort into making the second charge stick. McVay had already admitted that the Indy had not been zigzagging at the time of the attack, citing weather. The Navy insisted on proving that his lack of doing so had been consequential.

Among the list of witnesses the prosecution called to testify against McVay was none other than the submarine commander who had sunk the Indy in the first place: Commander Mochitsura Hashimoto. The decision caused an uproar among members of the press and politicians alike....

...During his testimony, he was asked to confirm that the Indy had not been zigzagging at the time he fired upon her — a point he readily conceded. But he went on to seemingly mock the maneuver by explaining that zigzagging would have made “no change” in the way he fired the torpedoes and that he would have sunk the defenseless ship either way.

Despite the unexpected blow that Hashimoto’s testimony had been to the prosecution, McVay was still convicted of hazarding his ship by failing to zigzag.

“The conviction meant that of the almost 400 U.S. captains whose ships had been sunk during the war, McVay was the only one to have been court-martialed,” Stanton said. Indeed, he was the only captain in the entire history of the Navy to be court-martialed whose ship was sunk by an act of war....

The survivors gathered signatures and lobbied members of Congress in visit after visit to Washington... it was up to Sen. John Warner (R-Va.), the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and former Navy secretary, to decide whether to take the exoneration resolution to the Senate floor for a vote.

For several months, Vincent said, Warner had opposed the measure and been “utterly immovable” until he received a letter from the most unlikely of people: Mochitsura Hashimoto.

Once again, 54 years after he’d testified at McVay’s court-martial, the submarine commander was coming to his old enemy’s defense. Hashimoto told Warner that he wanted to join the “brave men who survived the sinking of the Indianapolis ... in urging that your national legislature clear their captain’s name.” He added: “Our peoples have forgiven each other for that terrible war and its consequences. Perhaps it is time your peoples forgave Captain McVay for the humiliation of his unjust conviction.”

His heartfelt words were enough to soften Warner’s resolve. “With the addition of Hashimoto’s voice,” Vincent said, “it was as though the entire matter had reached a kind of cosmic critical mass, and Warner realized it was time to finally lay it to rest.”

With Warner at last allowing the resolution to be considered, Congress voted to exonerate McVay on Oct. 12, 2000. Hashimoto died 13 days later....​
 
Register to hide this ad
I believe McVay committed suicide before he was exonerated.
All around a very sad incident.
 
Last edited:
I highly recommend the book In Harm’s Way by Doug Stanton.

Great account of this tragic series of events.

I’m of the opinion that Captain McVay was screwed by the Navy, ultimately leading to his suicide.

But I understand it’s a complex issue, and other viewpoints are equally valid
 
Someone ALWAYS has to shoulder the blame. If a plane crashes and they find nothing to explain it, they write it off as pilot error.
 
I read that article this morning.

...I’m of the opinion that Captain McVay was screwed by the Navy, ultimately leading to his suicide.

But I understand it’s a complex issue, and other viewpoints are equally valid
I don't think other viewpoints are equally valid. The article makes clear that the captain was screwed. The Navy scapegoated him, and as a result he committed suicide in the late 60s. It was a campaign by his own men to exonerate him, buttressed by the testimony of the Japanese sub commander, in 1945 and 54 years later in 1999, that ultimately led to his exoneration by Congress in 2000, two weeks before the Japanese captain's death.
 
Imagine the change in history if the USS Indianapolis had been sunk on its way TO Tinian instead of after leaving it.

There were only two available bombs; Little Boy, of which the Indianapolis was carrying the Uranium core and other components, and Fat Man, the Plutonium bomb whose design had been tested at Trinity Site. Fat Man was delivered by airplane to Tinian four days after the Little Boy components were delivered, and two days before Indianapolis was sunk. Had the Little Boy not been available, there would not have been a second bomb available after Fat Man was used. The war could possibly have continued for some period, although there are arguments that Japan was ready to capitulate and a second bomb would not have mattered. In any case, the entire history book from that point would have read differently.
 
Ok, what date did the Indy get sunk? What date did the WAR END?

Indianapolis was sunk July 30, 1945, a full week before Little Boy was dropped. The Japanese surrender was announced by Hirohito on August 15, and the unconditional surrender was signed September 2nd.

USS Indianapolis sinking was not known about for 3-1/2 days, which would have made that August 2nd.
 
Imagine the change in history if the USS Indianapolis had been sunk on its way TO Tinian instead of after leaving it.

There were only two available bombs; Little Boy, of which the Indianapolis was carrying the Uranium core and other components, and Fat Man, the Plutonium bomb whose design had been tested at Trinity Site. Fat Man was delivered by airplane to Tinian four days after the Little Boy components were delivered, and two days before Indianapolis was sunk. Had the Little Boy not been available, there would not have been a second bomb available after Fat Man was used. The war could possibly have continued for some period, although there are arguments that Japan was ready to capitulate and a second bomb would not have mattered. In any case, the entire history book from that point would have read differently.

Before the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, no one thought two bombs would end the war. Most certainly, not the two men in charge of the Manhattan Project. Three days after the Trinity Test, General Groves wrote to Oppenheimer that it would be necessary to drop Little Boy and Fat Man and possibly two more Fat Man bombs.

The pilot of the plane that dropped Little Boy, Colonel Paul Tibbets, told varied accounts. According to his earliest recollection, it would take five atomic bombs to force surrender. He had fifteen bombers and trained crews ready to go in case they needed to drop more atomic bombs during the war.

There is evidence that a 3rd bomb would be ready to used as early as August 19th, 1945. Archival records show a third bomb was under assembly at Tinian in the Mariana Islands where the Enola Gay and Bockscar had flown from, with the main plutonium core about to be shipped from the U.S. On August 15, however, just as the plutonium was about to be sent to Tinian, news of the Japanese surrender came through and its loading was stopped.

A transcript of a top-level call between two military experts on August 13 reveals details of this “third shot.” It also confirmed that a vast production line of about 12 other atomic bombs was being readied for additional continuous strikes against other key targets.

It was agreed this next bomb would be available to be dropped on August 19, with a schedule of further bombs available throughout September and October.
 
I believe McVay committed suicide before he was exonerated.
All around a very sad incident.
According to the article:

...he endured anguished letter after anguished letter (“Hate mail,” Indy survivor Granville Crane Jr. later called it), from the families of the fallen sailors whose deaths had been blamed on him. “He read every letter he received and took them all personally,” Stanton said.
In the end, McVay took his own life on Nov. 6, 1968, with a gift from his father of a toy sailor clutched in his hand when he died.
 
Especially at that time in the war. It’s not like we were losing.
 
The Navy was looking for a scapegoat, and it certainly didn't wish to hear from a Japanese submarine captain that zig-zagging would have done no good. The simple fact is with the right geometry and the Long Lance torpedo, there was no escape.
 
There is evidence that a 3rd bomb would be ready to used as early as August 19th, 1945. Archival records show a third bomb was under assembly at Tinian in the Mariana Islands where the Enola Gay and Bockscar had flown from, with the main plutonium core about to be shipped from the U.S. On August 15, however, just as the plutonium was about to be sent to Tinian, news of the Japanese surrender came through and its loading was stopped.

A transcript of a top-level call between two military experts on August 13 reveals details of this “third shot.” It also confirmed that a vast production line of about 12 other atomic bombs was being readied for additional continuous strikes against other key targets.

It was agreed this next bomb would be available to be dropped on August 19, with a schedule of further bombs available throughout September and October.
I knew there were more bombs in the works, but didn't know how soon they would be available. All the while, the conventional war would continue.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top