unintended consequences
- Thread starter CAJUNLAWYER
- Start date
Some Mope bustin caps...Thug with a heater.
In the City of New Orleans....WHAT a surprise.
In the City of New Orleans....WHAT a surprise.
NFrameFred
Member
Well, now we know why you're here
. . . been here a year and that's the first post . . .
Last edited:
twodog max
Member
If we are to have freedoms of any sort we are going to have some that use those very freedoms against us. If the judicial system worked as it should, equally for all, then society could deal with the abuses against freedom. It is plain to see these days justice is not applied equally across the spectrum of the population.
Slightly puzzled. I thought that in VA twenty or more mph over speed limit was felonious reckless driving, or at least a presumption thereof. What happened to the law?
Read it Again.
The Second Amendment PROHIBITS the Government from Interfering with the PEOPLE'S Individual Right to Possess and Carry Weapons. The authors of the Constitution believed that rights existed before government, and that the Constitution and Bill of Rights are intended to restrict the government from abusing the rights of the people.
The bolded part is obviously true, but it doesn't necessarily mean that it is the law that is going to take care of this fact. I posted here a decade or two ago about a short-bus rider who wandered into a LGS and vocalized his astonishment at all the guns present. His case was handled without the law. I have often compared my father's harmlessness with guns to my harmlessness with dynamite, quite independent of any law. Neither of us was ever stupid enough to play with something potentially dangerous that he or I didn't know much about.
The founding fathers believed, IMO correctly, that there was more danger to society from gun control than from criminal control. Some people today want gun control, even though they are not going to get it, but don't want criminal control. Big mistake.
Oldengineer
Member
I think the question of "the rule of law" is on the ballot come November 4, 2024. Maybe not.
Facts and logic do tend to P'O some folks. No answer for that either. Joe
I don't like the looks of a lot of people, then when I see their gun, I really don't like them. But, if they are not discharging the weapon, I suppose they are legal. (Not knowing if they are a felon.) I've always known driving is a privilege, owning a gun is a right, but self preservation is the first law of human nature. I plan to obey the law. As far as the OP, I agree, sadly. These people are pulling our IQs down just by using our air. I need to stop now and "Post Quick Reply" while I still have this privilege.
Does he make the same claim about other kinds of property? He is a lawsuit waiting to happen.
I can sympathize with Cage's position. I see a lot of people out and about that I hope don't have guns. But in the grand scheme of things, I would rather risk a few idiots with guns than the jack boot of government.
OP
CAJUNLAWYER
Member
If he was inside the bar he would be breaking the law.
You can't fix stupid but Darwin helps thin the herd eventually.
An ever-increasing number of people can't handle the responsibility of freedom. Society is rapidly going feral.
I think the way the gun is pointed is more important than the distance from the house. Three feet pointed away from the house is safer than 500 feet pointed toward the house. Larry
Kinda looked like a rap song you had going on there!
OP
CAJUNLAWYER
Member
I do live in a special city...run by a "special" mayor...you have absolutely no idea!!
NFrameFred
Member
Originally Posted by Xfuzz
Some Mope bustin caps...Thug with a heater.
In the City of New Orleans....WHAT a surprise.
Don't be surprised to hear of someone from "Death Row Records" stealing that for a lyric
