Recent content by Jstonefish

Appreciate all the input and information from you all. I've got a box, but not the box for the gun. I posted a picture anyway in case someone might find the info useful. From the pictures I've seen, kinda wish mine was a SSV. But, I shouldn't complain. Haven't shot it yet, but hope to get out...

I think I panicked when assessing the current state of prices in the Denver area for 3rd Generation S&W's. Browsing the last Tanner show didn't help much either. No knock to the show or people implied. Quickly realized that prices will never go down and I jumped at a reasonably priced 5943 @ a...

Wondering if someone here is friends w/ Hickok45 (Youtube) and might be able to persuade him to do a video on my favorite S&W revolver? I'm sure opinions vary on his presentations, but I find him very engaging and his marksmanship is undeniable in my opinion. I would love to see a comparison...

Very interesting post that cleared up some questions I had. Attached pictures are from my C prefix, Post war snub. Has similar "S" markings on barrel flat and frame, and of course has the hammer block safety since it is a '48 or '49 revolver. I think Jack's comments on these being Service marks...

I don't have any 357 mag ammo. Is it visually obvious if it has been rechambered?

I've done a little research on the 38/44. Very curious about the Buffalo Bore +P since I don't handload, and have only shot it with standard 38 sp. It would be interesting to shoot it w/ something close to the intended heavy loads. Is it considered safe to carry this revolver with the hammer on...

Forgot to ask what is a recommended product to preserve this holster? I don't want to make a rookie mistake and ruin the remaining, leather finish by inadvertently stripping it off. It's still stiff and in reasonable good shape. Funny how paranoid I am after the many years this holster has...

OK, a bit overblown in the title! This revolver has been in the family since originally ordered, as best as I can tell. Thanks to Bill for approximating the delivery to the 1st year, 1930. Pretty standard, 5", blued, service grips, etc. As common as you can get!! Serial # 36XXX. I wanted to...

Obviously, I welcome all the feedback. Not that it makes a huge difference to me (since I like the strap), I'll go with the possibility that the safety strap is original. I certainly don't mind to be course correct in the future! Appreciate all the positive comments! Thanks, and again there is...

Thanks for the visuals, actually look better than the plastic stag-likes! Also appreciate all the input. My generic Googles missed many pertinent posts on these revolvers, in the Forum. Much appreciate the info, even if you had to post redundant info!

Thanks for the comments. Yes, C prefix I overlooked that. Good to know I'm not completely off base on ship date. I was curious about the original grips. At least now I can semi-act like I know what I'm talking about (1/2 the battle :)), if I decide to go that route and try to buy a pair. And...

Just joined the Forum and have enjoyed the wealth of info here, helping me understand the revolvers that I got from my father. From what I've gathered this one is a Pre-model 10, post war. The serial # 34XXX is late 1948 or early 1949 ship date. Does that sound correct? Unfortunately, the...

Just joined the Forum and have enjoyed browsing and seeing the outstanding leather workmanship on holsters crafted and owned by members. For as long as I can remember (+40 years), my Pre-10 snub has been in this Brill holster. Unfortunately, my father is no longer around to field my ??s, so I'm...