True, but a great deal of Internet space has been devoted to debate about whether that removal might have potential legal consequences in the event of a shooting event. If for no other reason, I would prefer to carry a firearm in provable factory configuration. I had the disconnector removed...
It is more than plausible that the gun was part of an agency order overrun that made its way into the commercial market. I assume that the odds of my finding another 3913 in this configuration are not particularly good, so this will be a keeper. Thanks again for your help!
Thanks. I called, and the gun was shipped in 8/94. The individual also said he checked the parts list for the gun and found no disconnector included. Because I had not previously heard of factory Gen 3 guns shipped without disconnectors, that got me interested in doing more research. It seems...
Thanks to all for the new info. The serial number is VBJ 2474. No box, so no further documentation. Judging by the level of apparent wear, this gun was probably not actually issued.
The only other visible clue as to use or ownership might be that the sights were replaced with Trijicon...
Thanks so much for the rapid response! I read the linked threads, and they are the kinds of discussions I referred to in my question, about the pros and cons of the disconnect feature.
Fastbolt's post on 03.19.17 included the following:
"Yes, S&W used to sell pistols to some agencies without...
I was recently fortunate to find a vintage 1994 3913, with black hammer and trigger. These appear to be forged rather than MIM. There is no mag disconnect/safety. The right side of the slide is imprinted with the language "CAUTION - CAPABLE OF FIRING WITH MAGAZINE REMOVED". Looks like...
This thread reminds me of a related 3913 question. I have a 1994 vintage 3913 that Smith advised me came from the factory without a magazine disconnect. The right side of the slide is imprinted with the language "CAUTION - CAPABLE OF FIRING WITH MAGAZINE REMOVED". Looks like silk-screening...