U.S. CARBINE CAL. 30 M1 - Underwood Elliott Fisher Company

Ok, don't shoot! :eek:
I've been called some really nasty names for this. But here's the M1 Carbine updated for the 21st Century. :rolleyes:

eOWxsbB.jpg
 
From the pictures it looks to be in original as issued condition.

The trigger housing is of the stamped variety used in the 1944 Underwood rifles. There should be an ordinance bomb stamp on the bottom of the trigger guard, if it is an original Underwood there will be a "U" stamped somewhere on the housing.

The push button safety, mag release, barrel band/swivel are correct for that gun for that time. Rear sight is correct and should have an "S" or "NPM" stamped on the left side.

The data indicates that the gun should have a round bolt but the flat top bolt could correct as the switch came between 1943 and 1944. So an early 44 production could have the flat bolt. It should be marked with a stamped "U" or "WU".

The stock is correct and the stamp G.H.D. over the U.E.F., and the handguard looks to be correct also.

Overall it would seem to me that you have an original, as issued, non modified M1 carbine. That is to say, a very, very rare piece. As such it would command a premium here in the U.S. The reworked/modified Underwood sells for around $1,500 and up. Your rifle, if I am correct in my evaluation would probably easily fetch $2,000 or more.

Congratulations on a very rare and unique piece of history.


Thank you for all the details you provided.

A few more closeup pictures

42c96f196ab39a3f9495674718335843.jpg


753ccdf10e08b6782b9ab900bf4f3290.jpg


71fe38b6ffd3bad041fecacd07a18dfa.jpg


80995acf05df6de8e16073046ea45735.jpg


117e62ddda22c4a69be8fb683f2dfd07.jpg


7711974850731d6b5b939f69246cfb1c.jpg
 
Your front and rear sight are original as they exhibit the right stampings "EU" and the "U" are correct for the Underwood. The ordinance stamp on the trigger guard is also correct.

Depending upon how comfortable you are with a disassembly you can check most all parts for their stamp. The "U" will probably be the most common, but other markings are "P-U", "M-U", "WU", "DW", plus many others.

The stock, in the sling cutout, should have a "M-U", "P-U", "LWU", "J" or "TRIMBLE/TN".

I have never personally seen an all original Carbine that was untouched and did not have some arsenal rework.
 
I can play. My Underwood-Elliot-Fisher, high wood marked Bavarian Forestry police. Which was a lend to German Police after the war for police work. Each area that received carbines marked them. Purchased from CMP way back when. Note lack of bayonet lug.


Somewhere around the digs are a Quality Hardware and an IBM.......From the glory days at the CMP in Anniston, AL.
 
Your front and rear sight are original as they exhibit the right stampings "EU" and the "U" are correct for the Underwood. The ordinance stamp on the trigger guard is also correct.

Depending upon how comfortable you are with a disassembly you can check most all parts for their stamp. The "U" will probably be the most common, but other markings are "P-U", "M-U", "WU", "DW", plus many others.

The stock, in the sling cutout, should have a "M-U", "P-U", "LWU", "J" or "TRIMBLE/TN".

I have never personally seen an all original Carbine that was untouched and did not have some arsenal rework.


I have not disassembled the M1 yet, but I’m generally comfortable disassembling any firearms, I have a good workbench and plenty of good tools. I’ll take more pictures when I do it.
 
Your front and rear sight are original as they exhibit the right stampings "EU" and the "U" are correct for the Underwood. The ordinance stamp on the trigger guard is also correct.

Depending upon how comfortable you are with a disassembly you can check most all parts for their stamp. The "U" will probably be the most common, but other markings are "P-U", "M-U", "WU", "DW", plus many others.

The stock, in the sling cutout, should have a "M-U", "P-U", "LWU", "J" or "TRIMBLE/TN".

I have never personally seen an all original Carbine that was untouched and did not have some arsenal rework.

Since this carbine was built in 1944 and the OP bought it in Switzerland, I think there's a fair chance it never made it back to a US arsenal.
 
Ok, don't shoot! :eek:
I've been called some really nasty names for this. But here's the M1 Carbine updated for the 21st Century. :rolleyes:

eOWxsbB.jpg

I'm not going to call you any really nasty names because that would serve no useful purpose. If you "updated" an Iver Johnson or Auto Ordnance carbine, then no harm has actually been done and those would be good upgrades. If you did that to an all-original, WW II issue carbine, I would simple turn pale and pass out.
 
To the OP. How many forums are you going to post your carbine on? I see your post on 3 other forums.

Why does it matter? I belong to the Ruger, the Colt and several other forums. If I have something that is of interest to other firearms enthusiasts, I post it where I like.
 
Ya know, my "updated" carbine sometimes gets wisecracks or snide remarks, but never outright hatred.
For those who got bent over my updated Carbine: yes it is a WW II Standard products rifle. However, due to a cracked gas cylinder, it now has a 1970s replacement barrel. So it ain't all original.
I still have the original stock, handguard, etc and could have it back in original condition in 30 minutes.
Besides, I also have an Inland that's just like Uncle Sam issued.
Admit it, you've seen much worse done to other classic firearms and a lot of that was irreversible.
This thing is a hoot to shoot. If you don't like it, tuff. I do and that's all that matters. :p
 
There are those who like to denigrate the M1 Carbine and its cartridge. I think they miss a very important point: It was a far superior self-defense tool for many applications than a 1911A1 pistol. Think about it: You take your average WW2 GI and hand him a handgun. Has he been trained how to use it? Probably not. Will he be able to hit anything with it past point shooting distance? Probably not and he has a good chance of missing at that distance as well. Hand him an M1 Carbine. The sight picture is just like the one on the Garand or later 1903s. He already knows how to hit with those. Now he has a light, handy weapon that he is much more likely to get hits with.

The handgun was invaluable for certain situations, but for most, the Carbine was far superior. In a way, it solved the problem that the various pistols with stocks were trying to fix (think FN High Powers w/stocks).

My two cents. Wonderful acquisition, Classic12!
 
Back
Top