1911 magazines explained

BB57

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2015
Messages
4,983
Reaction score
13,440
Location
NC
Let’s talk 1911 magazines for a bit.

The stimulus for this was a recent listing on this site for a “non-GI issue 1911-A1 magazine”.

Well…it wasn’t. It was a 7 round 1911 magazine that was stamped similar to GI issue magazines, but there are important distinctions.

Note the magazine feed lips on the magazine in question:

ED0DA317-9C13-42B7-8204-B8F3AF4A4757.jpeg


Next let’s look at these 3 magazines, left to right:

- a GI issue “hardball” or “tapered lip” magazine;
- a commercial “hybrid” or “semi-tapered lip”magazine; and
- a “wadcutter” “parallel” lip magazine.

57045637-CAB9-483F-A345-B5AA3F12B8D9_zpsvzqrjwdk.jpg


Let’s discuss the differences and applications for each magazine.

The GI tapered lip magazine (left)

The original JMB designed 1911 magazine was intended to be used with a 230 gr. round nose FMJ projectile. If you load up a dummy round (no primer or powder), remove the recoil spring from a non messed with 1911 or 1911A1, and then manually cycle the slide you’ll see the 230 gr FMJ feed from the tapered lip GI magazine with a smoothness reminiscent of a well oiled sewing machine.

The tapered lips provide fully controlled feed with the cartridge base rising smoothly under the tapered feed lips as the bullet rises on the feed ramp, allowing the cartridge to smoothly slide under the extractor as the round cleanly enters the chamber.

Now if you take a bullet with a truncated cone, round nose flat point, wadcutter, or hollow point design and do the same hand cycle, you’ll notice some differences. The round is shorter as there is no rounded point on the nose to contact the feed ramp before the base starts to rise and the round can impact the feed ramp at too low an angle and just stop. When it does still feed it isn’t smooth.

The hybrid or Colt commercial magazine (center)

This hybrid semi-tapered lip magazine was introduced by Colt after WWI when point shapes other than the round nosed FMJ started to become common.

The shorter and less tapered lips on this design keep the base of the cartridge case from rising too much before the shorter bullet starts to rise on the feed ramp.

The shorter lips also release the cartridge base sooner, before a round nose FMJ rises so much on the feed ramp that the angle is so steep that the pointed nose gets into a three point jam between the top of the barrel and the slide.

The shorter lips also prevent the angle of the cartridge and it’s rim from getting so steep that the rim can’t smoothly slide between the slide face and the extractor. If the rim is at too great an angle and binds between the bolt face and the extractor, the slide will stop about 1/8” out of battery and the pistol won’t fire.

Some very short (often lighter than 180 gr) semi wad cutters still won’t feed reliably from a Colt commercial / hybrid magazine as once again the base gets too high before the short bullet contacts the feed ramp and they just stop dead on the feed ramp and or the rim binds between the slide face and the extractor. Back in the day, pistol smiths would relieve the extractor opening to allow for a greater rim angle without binding. It solved the out of battery events but didn’t fix the feed ramp issues so they reprofiled the feed ramp and both widened and opened it up under the chamber to reduce the angle, but also left less support for the cartridge.


The “wadcutter” magazine

Most of the early lighter than 230 gr semi wad cutters, like the Hensley and Gibbs #68, used a fairly long and slender nose to keep it long enough to function in a hybrid magazine.

However some of the really short 185 gr semi wadcutter bullets still won’t feed as the base is too high when the bullet hits the feed ramp.

The parallel lipped “Wadcutter” magazine was developed for those short bullets. The parallel lips keep the base down until the bullet contacts the ramp and then the shorter length of the lips releases the cartridge and pops the rim up into the space between the slide face and extractor.

These magazines don’t work well with round nose FMJ bullets. The nose rises long before the base and the resulting angle either causes a bind on the rim, or it pushes the nose up into the space between the slide and the barrel, creating a nasty 3 point jam.

——-

As you move to shorter and shorter feed lips you also reduce the controlled feed trait of the 1911.

Wilson took it one step farther with their 47D magazines. They do away with controlled feed entire. They present the bullet higher in front of the slide and then almost immediately release the round, popping it up in front of the slide face, that then bats it into the chamber.

The 47D works ok with most bullet types, but isn’t as reliable with any particular type as a magazine designed for a particular bullet shape.

——-

For most common bullet shapes and weights between 185 and 230 grains the Colt commercial / hybrid magazine works just fine. That’s why nearly all 1911 manufacturers use the hybrid design.

Unfortunately many shooters who don’t understand how things work start thinking a magazine designed for practical pistol shooting must be better and run out and buy wadcutter magazines before they’ve even shot their new 1911, grab some cheap round nose FMJ range ammo and then blame the pistol when it frequently jams.

Use the hybrid mag that came with the pistol - unless you are shooting a short semi wad cutter than really needs a wad cutter magazine.

——-

Pop quiz:

Going back the mag in question that was sold what kind of magazine is it?

A) GI tapered lip magazine

B) Hybrid semi tapered lip magazine

C) Parallel lip wadcutter magazine
 
Register to hide this ad
Yep, it’s a wadcutter magazine interestingly marked like a GI magazine.

GI or GI style tapered magazines are unfortunately hard to find and I am not aware of anyone currently making them.
 
Regardless it has a rounded follower as found with newer 1911s. Such mags do not work with any of my older 1911s. Had a 2008 1911 with such mags, didn't function very well so down the road it went.
 
Regardless it has a rounded follower as found with newer 1911s. Such mags do not work with any of my older 1911s. Had a 2008 1911 with such mags, didn't function very well so down the road it went.

Is there supposed to be some magic in a domed follower? It just looks wrong to me.
 
I have been told 2 things about 1911 magazines:

1. Use factory 7-round magazines (Colt brand, American-made, with dimple, or rather, pimple on the follower to lessen last-round jump)

2. Use hard-ball ammo. No need for hollow-points (they likely won't open anyway, since .45 ACP ammo moves so slowly).



---------
 
I have been told 2 things about 1911 magazines:

1. Use factory 7-round magazines (Colt brand, American-made, with dimple, or rather, pimple on the follower to lessen last-round jump)

2. Use hard-ball ammo. No need for hollow-points (they likely won't open anyway, since .45 ACP ammo moves so slowly).-

That may have been true in the distant past, but I get good expansion with a 4” 1911 using 185 gr XTP, 230 gr Golden Saber and 230 gr HST (9mm 124 gr XTP on the left for scale and comparison).

001(3).jpg



8 round magazines are very common and generally quite reliable when made by a quality manufacturer.

The thing to avoid is a follower like the v shaped follower on the shooting star magazine, if you are using it in an aluminum framed 1911. The last round can drag the top of the follower with it and “peck” at the feed ramp in the frame. Many 9mm 1911s use an integrated barrel mounted feed ramp and it’s not a problem with that type of feed ramp.
 
When I first started shooting the steel plate matches many years ago I bought 6 mags for shooting hard cast 230 grain round nosed bullets. That's all I used. And that was with a 1943 Ithaca 1911A1. When I got my Springfield Armory 1911A1 many years later I again ordered 6 more Chip McCormick magazines for that pistol. Never had any reason to change. Frank
 
Thanks BB57, nice write-up. I have been shooting 1911s for maybe 20 years or so and never heard this explanation. Now I know!

Rosewood
 
Very good explanation. Considering that something apparently so simple as the magazine has to be designed with an eye to both the vertical and horizontal axes controlling the up and forward movement of cartridges speaks volumes about both JMB's genius in getting the 1911 to run and feed ball ammo so dang smoothly and Chip McCormick, Bill Wilson, Virgil Tripp and Sandy Strayer being able to refine the thing to effectively handle different bullet profiles. The magazine, feedramp and frame interface of the 1911, essentially requiring cartridges to "climb" into the chamber, is really the sole thing I could call a true deficiency- a minor one at that- of JMB's design. Realigning things to permit straight in feeding helps- not eliminates- that feeding issue. Remarkable when one considers that Browning did all that by visualization, sketches and wood modeling.
 
Great info, much new to me. Could you also speak on the follower dimple?
 
When I first started shooting the steel plate matches many years ago I bought 6 mags for shooting hard cast 230 grain round nosed bullets. That's all I used. And that was with a 1943 Ithaca 1911A1. When I got my Springfield Armory 1911A1 many years later I again ordered 6 more Chip McCormick magazines for that pistol. Never had any reason to change. Frank

Like the one on the right, Chip McCormick magazines are a good example of a parallel lip wadcutter magazine. They won’t always work with a long 230 gr round nosed FMJ bullet, but many 230 gr round nosed bullets have a comparatively short nose section intended to feed better out of hybrid and wad cutter magazines.

As long as it works for a 1911 shooter, it works. When it doesn’t work is when the 1911 shooter needs to understand the differences in magazines.
 
A thousand likes, BB57! I've read bits and pieces of this information over the years, but other than ID'ing the types, it never made much sense to me. Your writeup puts it all together. Thanks!

I have heard (yep hearsay....) that the H&G 68 was designed so two points on the bullet contact the feed ramp at the same place as a 230 gr ball. Evidently this was intended to make the bullet feed like a 230 gr ball. These points are the forward band just in front of the case mouth and the transition between the flat point and the "side" of the bullet profile. I don't know if this is truth or "internet wisdom." Do you know if this is really true? If I had an H&G 68 mold, I check the numbers for myself.
 
Great info, much new to me. Could you also speak on the follower dimple?


The dimple (or pimple, I've heard it called both) was a design feature by none other than John Moses Browning. He put it there to provide additional friction against the last round in the magazine. The idea was that when the next to last round was cycled into the chamber, the last round had a lot less pressure on it from the magazine spring, especially if the spring was worn, and could move forward when it was at the top of the magazine and potentially be out of a good position when the 1911 was fired and the last round was to feed into the chamber. That was his theory and there is a lot of debate as to the validity of the theory.
 
Back during my AMU days our armorer had an insert to shape the lips. IIRC there is a mfg of 1911 mags that had removable mag bases. Remove base, spring and follower. Insert solid steel insert, align insert with pin though holes in mag and insert, shape lips using brass hammer. Perfect lip shape for ball and jacketed semi wadcutter match.
 
You guys talking about adjusting these magazines reminds me of the dark art of shaping of magazine lips on the SMLE and No.4 Enfields.
 
Back
Top