And this is what the push for this has been about.
And who is going to make the decision that a particular purchase or series of purchases should be reported to law enforcement? My experience with minor functionaries trying to justify their jobs has never been good. I'm a competitve pistol shooter. If I buy a case of .22 rimfire shells on my credit card, and a minor functionary gets the vapors from seeing that it is 5000 rounds of ammunition, should I be expecting some badges to show up at my front door?
it's not so much law enforcement in the general sense that'd be called. It'd be specific agencies.
I cannot recall if the video featured here or not. but it was an audit the audit flavored deal where a BATF agent was confronted by the local constabulary .... and it devolved gloriously with the BATF agent being taken down, tazed, cuffed and stuffed and all sorts of other cheap entertainment.
How this came to be was the agent went to the residence of an individual who purchased multiple arms. The agent went to verify that the individual, in fact, had possession of these arms as it was somehow flagged as a potential straw purchase ....
It was a whole lot of action with no crime whatsoever involved.
The thing to pay attention to here is that the individual called in the agent suspecting some kind of fraud of the part of the agent.
The local constabulary simply responded to, and investigated what appeared to be a crime on the part of the ATF agent.
They did their job. It was an unusual occurrence that warranted some sorting out
The agent essentially acted upon what was little more than a transaction record. Considerably less than the threshold of the police.
In most cases, it will not be the local police or Sheriff that will be involved. They look for provable cases.
It'll be cherry picked agencies with less regard for the usual procedures of law enforcement